These seven variables included: attachment to parents and teachers, family supervision, conventionality of peers, school commitment, beliefs, and involvement (Ozbay and Ozcan, 2006). Hart and Mueller (2012) measured similar independent variables, but specifically examined commitment to sport and non-sport activate not commit to academics. Also, they did not analyze family supervision outside of school, instead they looked at parents overall involvement in school activates (Hart and Mueller, 2012). Peer relationship was only measured by Ozbay and Ozcan (2006) in order to discover their influence in the participant’s delinquent …show more content…
Both studies used social bond theory to analyze the variables that influence students to engage in negative school behaviors and Ozbay and Ozcan (2006) also examined other factors outside of school. It is important for teachers and administrators to understand how much impact they have on student’s behavior inside and outside of the classroom. Both studies were well written and presented, but it faced some limitations. In Ozbay and Ozcan (2006) study, they reveal that they did not have any participants that were seniors because they were taking part in nationwide examinations. In addition, their study cannot be generalizable to the entire country of Turkey or to other developing countries because it was only conducted in the city of Ankara. For Hart and Mueller (2012) analysis, they used a national sample and did not collect data strictly for their study. In addition, they only had data from students in the tenth grade not students from all high school grade