Violence is also justified in war. Obviously, war tends to be very violent but sometimes people would say that violence in war has to have a limit. In actuality, there is no limit of violence in war. In the article “Hiroshima: Was It Necessary”, Doug Long (n.d.) writes about how there is no limit in war by using the bombing of Hiroshima as an example. Japan was fighting against the United States and had four years bombed Pearl Harbor. The United States fought back but Japan did not surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to end the Japanese-American War. Without that use of one would say “excessive” violence, even though there is no such thing as excessive violence in war, then the Japanese-American War would have continued meaning
