Hiroshima Bombing Benefits

Improved Essays
Like most American citizens, we were educated that the U.S. released nuclear bombs to end WWII with Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These were used to save both American and Japanese lives. The United States believed, forcing Japan to surrender with atomic weapons was the way to go! The dropping of these bombs had three major benefits to the use of nuclear weapons. First, it instantaneously stopped the war. This war could have been dragged on for months or even years. The Asian civilians were dying at rates of 100K or more every month, thanks to the Japanese. Asia was better off, even if the bombs cut the war shorter by a few months. Second, if Japan would have surrendered in an attack, they would have fought back after recovering. Last, these horridness …show more content…
The racial talk about why the U.S. did what they did was only talked about in two works, both being over a period old. Thinking about the entire situation, the whole war was everything but human. The Japanese were extremely unpredictable. No one knows how long WWII would have even lasted without the dropping of the bombs. Then again dragging on a war would have been cruel for all contributors. The “Great Leap Forward” took place in 1958. This was Mao’s effort to modernize China and the economy. The plan was that by 1988, China’s economy would have equaled Americas. Mao saw the people of China, capable of anything. He felt there were two main points that needed to be addressed, these being agriculture and industry. This was a five-year plan, known as the Great Leap Forward. This plan lasted from 1958 to 1963. While the agriculture workers needed industry to manufacture modern instruments for modernization, the industry could only flourish if the work power was well nourished. Mao was seen as one of the most significant individuals in modern world history. He drove imperialism out of China, construction it into a world power, improved schooling and increased life

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Mao mobilized the campaign in hopes of turning a country dependent on agriculture into a socialist power through rapid industrialization. Focusing on industry, Mao sought government control over the farms of the peasants. All foods were severely rationed and prices skyrocketed as a result. Heng finishes his description of the era with, “We were always hungry.” He personally recounts the young and old having “water swelling disease,” perhaps one of the many reasons for the 30 million deaths that came from the famine as a direct result of the Great Leap Forward.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Mao Change China

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mao was, at one point, the great man he had described when he first came into power because he wanted to make China seem like a promise land where people could have different freedoms. He did this by creating different reforms and laws to give people the China they wanted. One of the reforms…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stalin And Mao Case Study

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stalin continued on with the second and third 5 Year Plans in 1933 and 1938, respectively in addition to the economic policy of collectivization. However, Mao realized that the Soviet model for industrial development was not working in China due to China’s high ratio of people to resources and what first started off as Soviet aid had now turned into excessive loans and exploitation. Therefore, Mao modified the goals of the first 5 Year Plan and progressed towards the Great Leap Forward as his version of the second 5 Year Plan. While Stalin’s second and third 5 Year Plans set more realistic targets and focused on a greater production of machinery and arms for defence, they were considerably effective. Production of consumer goods and food was apparent however towards the third 5 Year Plan and the forthcoming of war, consumer production was once again put on hold.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Did Japan Surrender

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cook, Gareth. "Why Did Japan Surrender?" Boston.com. August 07, 2011. Accessed February 21, 2016. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2011/08/07/why_did_japan_surrender/?page=5.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States was not justified in using the Atomic Bomb on Japan. In John Hersey’s article “Hiroshima,” one of the survivors, Father Kleinsorge tells of his reaction to the explosion. John writes, “Then, for a few seconds or minutes, he went out of his mind.” In this one instant we see the terrible impact that the bomb had on his mental state. Not only was he physically affected, but like many others he was emotionally scarred.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mao’s first 5 Year Plan was more or less a success. From most, it moved China a bit up the scale. Mao wanted more though, and this was the problem. The USSR went from something small and ramped right up to being superpower. Mao wanted this for China, so he came up with an idea called the Great Leap Forward.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 70 years ago on August 6th and 9th the United states deployed very controversial military weaponry on Japan. Two Atomic bombs, Little Boy and Fat Boy, were dropped on Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This was the first use of atomic bombs in human history and is still currently debated whether it was necessary or justified. Many think it was justified because it ended the war with much less casualties, ended the war quickly, and the fact that japanese had the motto of no surrender.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the book by John Hersey Hiroshima the city was an ideal target for American bombing as it was an important military centre of the region. The book states that the city “had been an inviting target – mainly because it had been one of the most important military-command and communications centers in Japan” (HERSEY, P.42). Besides the military importance, Hiroshima had a favorable geographical position which would help to harm the territory as much as it was possible so that to make the bombing impressive and to show off the military power of the United States of America. The places were chosen according to several criteria such as a number of closely-built houses and other buildings, how densely built-up the area was, military value, and the territory had to be…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War ll was a long time time ago. There were good times for America, and there were bad times. Many people believe that the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. And others thought that they were not necessary. The bombs were in fact necessary because they helped us win the war.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dahi makes is that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not save half a million American lives as former president Harry Truman claimed. While it is true that the bombings had devastating effects both initially and thereafter, the U.S. would have surely invaded the Japanese islands later in 1945-1946 (Stimson 385). Considering famous battles like those at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, it is easy to guess that the same death and destruction for US and Japanese soldiers would occur for several months, or even years; in fact, it was projected that major fighting would not cease until late in 1946 (Stimson 385). The looming warfare could have resulted in over one million casualties of just American troops (Stimson, 385). These projected numbers were, and still are, alarming to imagine.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays