Hirohito's Violation Of Atomic Bombing

Improved Essays
Hirohito was Japan’s Emperor and head of state during World War 2, and was on the throne during the atomic bombing as well as the postwar period, his reign ending upon his death in 1989. Hirohito condemned the use of the atomic bomb, saying in his August 14th 1945 radio broadcast after accepting the Potsdam Declaration: “The enemy has begun to employ a new and most cruel bomb, the power of which to do damage is, indeed, incalculable, taking the toll of many innocent lives. Should we continue to fight, it would not only result in an ultimate collapse and obliteration of the Japanese nation, but also it would lead to the total extinction of human civilisation.” This displays Hirohito’s belief that the bomb’s power would not only bring about Japan’s destruction, but it’s continued use in war would affect the whole world. …show more content…
How much involvement in decision making the Emperor had during the war is debated, though it is generally believed that he was fully informed of military plans and never opposed the decisions of the supreme war council of Japan. Historian Richard B. Finn said of Hirohito’s involvement in the war: “The decisions that led to the war in 1941 were made unanimously by the cabinet, the emperor was fully informed about them, they were often made in his presence, he knew in advance of the plan to attack Hawaii, and he even made suggestions about how to carry it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Japan and the U.S.A were at war after Japan bombed U.S pearl harbour. Pearl Harbour was bombed on December 7, 1941 and the U.S declared war the day after. The U.S were not officially at war in WW2 until a day after Japan bombed them. Japan was an imperialist nation trying to extend their authority over other nations lands with military power. Why did President Truman decide to use atomic bombs against Japan in 1945?…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Soviet Union’s invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria, the Japanese Supreme War Council had begun to vote on the action of surrendering. For this reason, the atomic bomb’s use on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not needed. Japan would have surrendered sooner than the end of the year. Another reason the atomic bombs were not needed to be used were that Japan’s refusal to surrender was only due in part to the Potsdam Declaration's statement that Japan’s Emperor Hirohito step down from his throne. Evidently, after Japan’s ultimate official surrender on September 2nd, 1945, the Emperor Hirohito was allowed to keep his monarchical position thus proving that the use of the atomic bombs were only barbaric vengeance by the United States.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his poignant editorial, James Agee urges the public to consider the implications of the atomic bomb, and cautions the public about the force they have unleashed. Agee argues that the detonation of the bomb has polarized man’s legacy, splitting history into commitment and consequence. He describes the weapon as “a merely pregnant threat, a merely infinitesimal promise,” giving the impression that the bomb’s scar upon Japan marked the awakening of a darker force. His diction of pregnancy and promise directs the reader into the future while remaining vague, leaving the nature of the turning point subjective.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On August 6 1945, a US plane named the Enola Gay flew over Hiroshima, a civilian city that had minimal military value and dropped the worlds first atomic bomb nicknamed little boy over Hiroshima, the initial blast instantly killed 80,000 people leaving Hiroshima a wasteland for months. This was a significant event of WW2 as it enlightened the world on why nuclear weapons shouldn’t be used in warfare. The use of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima in 1945 has long remained one of the most controversial decisions of the second world war, whether US president Harry S Truman was right to authorise these nuclear attacks against japan. The US objective in these bombing was to minimise the number of American casualties and possibly put an ending to the long lasting war. This would then represent the orthodox interpretation of this event.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was an average, hot day in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Home to the Japanese army’s Second General Headquarters, yet also home to 280,000 civilians, 43,000 military personnel, and 20,000 Korean forced laborers (Gray, Paul, and Kunii). Everything had been running accordingly, adults going to their jobs, school children assisting in the cleaning of the streets, until they saw a foreign object, hurling at them at a fast speed. It exploded before anyone had the chance to choke out the work ‘bomb’, leaving the menace behind the death trap, President Truman,a villain to Japan. The Japanese had attacked multiple places before the bombing occurred, including cities such as Shanghai, Manchuria, and most famously, Pearl Harbor.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q8. In my opinion, President Truman made the correct decision when it came to dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. Although I believe it was the correct decision at the time, I do not think it was morally correct, I am not justifying the deaths of thousands of Japanese citizens. However, looking at the facts and the current situation at the time, I believe that President Truman made the appropriate decision for the dispute at hand with Japan. In addition, this was not a decision that was made in a matter of seconds, President Truman and his advisors thought about what would be the best solution.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eighty thousand citizens lost their lives immediately after the bomb hit Hiroshima. In the article, “Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”, an eyewitness described what it was like when the bomb struck. The witness described people with “raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips” and “women without jaws screamed incoherently for help”. Innocent women and children paid the ultimate price for the attack made by Japan. Not only did hundreds die immediately after the blast but another 60,000 died by the end of the year.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It also resulted in an increase in cancer and birth defects in the region. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing another 40,000. These events resulted in one of the fiercest historiographical debates that historians face today. While it is acknowledged that the impact of this bomb was devastating for the citizens of these cities, the question…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays