Clinton: Next President or Not? As the 2016 presidential elections approaches one name in particular stands above the rest: Hillary Clinton. The 2016 presidential elections are a mix match of odd candidates. Among these candidates there are retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, Billionaire Entrepreneur Donald Trump, our very own John Kasich from Ohio, and a scandalous Hillary Clinton; despite having choices, the 2016 candidates are not very good ones. However, voting is a very important right and privilege we have as Americans, but more importantly you should know who you are voting for as the next president. Each candidate has their own set of good and bad qualities. Hillary Clinton should not be a presidential candidate because of her presidential
…show more content…
A president of the United States is meant to represent the American people and its nation, but much like her husband, William Clinton 42nd president of the United States, Hillary Clinton does not fit the bill. William Clinton had been in many scandals which led to him being the 2nd president to be impeached, tarnishing the Clinton name forever. However, no one can judge another based on who they are affiliated with. To put Bill Clinton aside, the legacy of Hillary Clinton being president would land her in the history books perhaps a turning point in American history even. Not because of political stand point or agenda but because she is a woman. Indeed having a female president would be a turning point in history, yet, to have that as a reason to vote for Hillary is wrong. History would repeat itself as it did in the presidential election for Barack Obama in 2012 …show more content…
Clinton’s political career has been one conspiracy after another with the murder of Vince Foster to the Benghazi debacle. No evidence can be found as proof of her involvement in the case of Vince Foster’s murder or suicide, but how can one vote for a person who may be a potential murderer or at least involved in something so diabolical? Analyst James Dale Davidson stated, "The fact that the photographs are disappearing, the x-rays were allegedly taken and disappeared, the fact that all the things that you would do if you were trying to cover up and disguise the evidence have been done in this case, where the testimony of the witnesses was changed in the FBI reports -- it doesn't add up." (Lane, 1998). The Benghazi cover-up, however, was something much harder to sweep under the rug. The Defense Intelligence Agency reported, "We expect more anti-U.S. terrorist attacks in eastern Libya [redacted], due to the terrorists’ greater presence there." (Morris, 2014). That statement was reported six days before the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. It does not matter how much intelligence there is; if there is even a kernel of proof of an impending attack on our country one must take appropriate measures. President Bush made the same mistake when he had knowledge of an attack before 9/11. The plain fact is that this possible future president failed miserably in her first
A president of the United States is meant to represent the American people and its nation, but much like her husband, William Clinton 42nd president of the United States, Hillary Clinton does not fit the bill. William Clinton had been in many scandals which led to him being the 2nd president to be impeached, tarnishing the Clinton name forever. However, no one can judge another based on who they are affiliated with. To put Bill Clinton aside, the legacy of Hillary Clinton being president would land her in the history books perhaps a turning point in American history even. Not because of political stand point or agenda but because she is a woman. Indeed having a female president would be a turning point in history, yet, to have that as a reason to vote for Hillary is wrong. History would repeat itself as it did in the presidential election for Barack Obama in 2012 …show more content…
Clinton’s political career has been one conspiracy after another with the murder of Vince Foster to the Benghazi debacle. No evidence can be found as proof of her involvement in the case of Vince Foster’s murder or suicide, but how can one vote for a person who may be a potential murderer or at least involved in something so diabolical? Analyst James Dale Davidson stated, "The fact that the photographs are disappearing, the x-rays were allegedly taken and disappeared, the fact that all the things that you would do if you were trying to cover up and disguise the evidence have been done in this case, where the testimony of the witnesses was changed in the FBI reports -- it doesn't add up." (Lane, 1998). The Benghazi cover-up, however, was something much harder to sweep under the rug. The Defense Intelligence Agency reported, "We expect more anti-U.S. terrorist attacks in eastern Libya [redacted], due to the terrorists’ greater presence there." (Morris, 2014). That statement was reported six days before the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. It does not matter how much intelligence there is; if there is even a kernel of proof of an impending attack on our country one must take appropriate measures. President Bush made the same mistake when he had knowledge of an attack before 9/11. The plain fact is that this possible future president failed miserably in her first