Hiibel Case Study

Decent Essays
On account of Hiibel v. the sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Larry Hiibel had been captured and accused of defying Nevada's state law called "stop and identify." Hiibel was with a more youthful lady sitting in his truck when the nearby Sheriff's Department got a call around a man who had struck a lady and was in a red and silver GMC truck, which both fit the depiction and area of Hiibel at the time. At the point when the cop drew nearer Hiibel and requests his recognizable proof he denied saying it was an infringement of both his fourth and fifth sacred right to uncover his distinguishing proof. After a long and drawn out verbal squabble between the workplace and Hiibel, Hiibel was accused of abusing Nevada's "stop and identify" statue

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Myers also references litigation involving false confessions in Robles v. Autozone, Inc., 2008 WL 2811762 (Cal. Ct. App. July 22,…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the State of New Hampshire v. Sondra Murray, Ms. Murray was charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and possession of marijuana. She was convicted of the disorderly conduct which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 644:2, and possession of marijuana, which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Assignment sub-heading: TITLE AND CITATION: Gardner v. Broderick, 88 S. Ct. 1913 (1968) TYPE OF ACTION: Robert Gardner filed suit against the State of New York, seeking reinstatement as a New York City patrol officer and demanded back pay. He refused to waive his privilege against self-incrimination. FACTS OF THE CASE:…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Name of the Case: State of Utah v. Travis Dee Timmerman Date Case was Decided: September 4, 2009 Court Rendering the Decision: Supreme Court of Utah Background: Travis Timmerman was charged with attempted rape, forcible sexual abuse, and assault. At the first hearing, the victim, Mrs. Timmerman, cited her spousal privilege not to testify against her husband. The State then presented Mrs. Timmerman’s statements made previously to the police and to a sexual assault nurse. Because of these statements, the magistrate bound Mr. Timmerman over for trial, Mr. Timmerman then filed a motion to void this stating that his confrontation rights under the federal and state constitutions were violated because he was unable to cross-examine Mrs. Timmerman…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary B.C’s controversial automatic roadside prohibition (ARP) scheme – the toughest drinking and driving law in the country – has been largely upheld in a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada. Introduced in 2010, the ARP scheme involved efforts to remove impaired drivers from B.C’s roads through the use of license suspensions, financial penalties and remedial programs. The scheme necessitates roadside checks and analysis of drivers’ breath samples using an approved screening device (ASD). Several drivers had challenged the B.C.’s roadside prohibitions in recent years, claiming that the ARP scheme was a criminal law in disguise and invades the federal government’s exclusive jurisdiction over criminal law.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Page 4 of 150 PageID #: 34551: Retrieved from website: http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f312000/312037.pdf The Wall Street Journal. Sidel (2015).…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Billings Police officer, Grant Morrison deprived Mr. Ramirez of his constitutional right to be protected by the fourth amendment and the fourteenth amendment and the right to unreasonable search and seizure and the right to be free from excessive police abuse and the right to be free from Grant Morrison's unlawful, reckless, and deliberate indifferent and conscience shocking deadly force. The Billings police department ie: Officer Grant Morrison and boss, Billings Police Chief Rich St. john acted in wrongful conduct which was deliberate in thoughts and actions by knowingly committing Maliciously, reckless disregard for the right and safety of a citizen of Billings, namely Richard Ramirez. What is sad and horrific in nature, are the actions of Billings Police Chief Rich St. John who created and fostered an environment with in the Billings Police Department of practices, customs and policies that encouraged and allowed…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case that I have chosen to write about is the very first on the list that we were given to choose from. Brown v. Mississippi that ultimately had the ruling of, “physical coercion violates the Fourth Amendment” (Becker, et al. p. 197). In this case, the defendants were charged with murdering an individual by the name of Raymond Stewart.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    HGC Case Study

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A1: Business Objective: Healthy Body Wellness Center (HBWC) Office of Grants Giveaway (OGG) business objective is to offer a proficient methodology that promotes improvement in the quality and usefulness of medical grants. HBWC disburses several medical grants through federally supported health research, and implemented the Small Hospital Grant Tracking System (SHGTS) to automate assignment and tracking of the grant disbursement, streamline review of completed evaluation submitted by grant seekers and promote sharing of health information among healthcare professionals. A2: Security Principle The guiding security principle that HBWC should use to meet Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) is an ISO 27002 security framework, accompanied…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tony Tasinas No Heroes, No Villains CRJ 101-Professor Smalls 12/7/15 On June 28, 1972, James Richardson awaiting the subway train which would take him to work. He was stopped and ordered to “put up your hands, and get against the wall”.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The identification of several significant facts in the case of Tennessee v. Garner calls into question the use of deadly force in the “unattempted” apprehension of an unarmed suspect. The first such fact is the admission and later verification by Hymon that Garner was unarmed. A second fact is that the suspect was fleeing in the opposite direction (away) from Officer Hymon and in a position as not to cause the officer to be in fear for his life. Additionally, Officer Hymon with the aid of his flashlight was able to observe that the suspect was a minor and of slender statue (observing his hands and face) posing no threat to him or others.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays