The essence of any effective leader is to be able to adapt to their environment by performing and adjusting in various roles plays needed to analyze getting the best out of productivity from their subordinates (Fernandez, Cho, & Perry, 2010). The key to situational Approach formally known as Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model is for leaders to develop a sense of feel for their working environment and apply the most efficient style of leadership to appropriate leading the subordinates (Laureate Education, 2012). Thus, often requires several critical thinking skill approaches as a leading person to adjust and adapt to an emergency situation that provides no guideline. In which may threaten or put one 's leadership …show more content…
Thus, disabled the leaders ability to gain confidence in their productivity, which may require more upper management supervision intervention to get the most out of the subordinate productivity (Hersey & Blanchard, 2016). Both limitations, an organizational leader, can assume the association of their slackness through the evaluation of the numbers of sick leaves absences (Schreuder et al., 2011). The Hersey & Blanchard situational leadership theory in the leave absence may reflect that the leader is to take responsibility for becoming concern with their workers low productivity and interest (Gupta, 2009). The model suggests that the leaders should focus communicating with their subordinates’ ways to increase productivity and decrease their absence from work (Gupta, 2009). As low productivity do not make a leader look good requiring adjusting their leadership style to intervene to empower interest of their subordinates effort towards high performance and productivity (Blanchard, & …show more content…
Benjamin Carson adjusted well and efficient to the collaboration of teamwork demonstrated in his adaptability, and flexibility to accept responsibility for those twins’ lives. The leader, Dr. Benjamin Carson, his response was to first critically considered coordinating with his team despite his leading role to inform, share, receive their vital team feedback that contributed to the success of the conjoin twins separation. He provided his teammates confidence to ensure the creativity of the operation will require a different approach. For instance, he had to consider critically removing blood from the conjoint twins bodies so that their bodies can be slowed down the impulsive of blood flow to the brain, which required stopping the heart (Siese, 2015). The little blood remains significantly reduce fatal blood loss a decision that was critical considered and communicated in advance to his subordinates (Siese, 2015). Because the skull of the infants were abnormal he made a decision to leave the skull than to reconstruct provided that he weigh the cons and pros in his decision-making process to reduce complication, knowing the life of the infants were worth more than the cosmetology (Siese,