Battle Of Salamis Compare And Contrast

Great Essays
Back into the historical time, there was one of the major battle happened at the Second Persian Invasion from 480 to 429Bc. It was the battle of Salamis under King Xerses. There were several authors reported this battle with different view. Therefore, this essay will establish that, whereas Herodotus portrays the battle of Salamis as though it occurred directly after the capture of Athens, Aeschylus who fought at the battle of Salamis potrays it from the Persian viewpoint and provides different information compared to Herodotus.
The battle of Salamis was a naval battle that fought between the Greece city and Persia. The battle of Salamis marked the main point of the Second Persian time and it was the most significant battle in history. Herodotus
…show more content…
It was the influence of the divine on the battle whereas Herodotus claims that there were many apparitions of deities. While Aeschylus says to some vague “God” or “god” was opposed to the Persians. According to Aeschylus’s version, it seemed like that Persian became upset about God because they think God opposed to them “free tombs of ansestors and temple-homes of native gods. This battle is do or die! Out of our ranks only a Persian murmur. Rose to oppose them-then when every instant cried out for action!” (Aeschylus,14). According to the historical time, people tend to believe in god and ghost that could help them figure out the future and knew what to do next while they were suffering or having any challenges that could not be solve. That might be a reason that later on in Aeschylus’s book, the ghost Dareius let them know about the future about the battle of Plataea would happen after the battle of …show more content…
Aeschylus who fought as the battle of Salamis potray it from the Persian viewpoint and provided the diffrent information compare to Herodotus. Overall, there were several different points between Herodotus and Aeschylus about the battle of Salamis. Those different points were such as the different in the number of ship and triremes that fought in the battle of Salamis. The other differences was on Aeschylus version, it provided more detail of explaining about what were happening during the battle. The reasons behind this were probably that Aeschylus was a person who actually fought at the battle of Salamis. Overall, the battle of Salamis became the largest battle that affect the historical time. After everything, the battle of Salamis created the relationship between Greeks and Persians. After this battle, Greece had become safer, stronger and did not have to afraid of any threating from other

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A small pass would not be able to supply enough water, food, and space for 2,000,000 men. Matthews’ evidence in Document D provides an obvious factor that the other documents failed to bring up. The environment couldn’t possibly have supported over 400,000 men let alone 2 million. In Document A Herodotus broke down all the parts of the Persian military involved in the entire war, while we’re just looking for the small battle which was a fraction of the military. Secondly, Herodotus provides no sturdy evidence to support his claim.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Themistocles was born in Athens in 524 BCE. He was the son of Neocles a middle class Athenian and a non-Athenian concubine mother. He was a citizen of Cleisthenes which in 508 BCE which made all Athenians free men. This contributed to his democratic tendencies. Themistocles lived in Athens for his entire life but often traveled because he was part of the Athenian military.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Persian Wars Dbq

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Persian wars occurred during 499–479. There are many factors including Greek colonization of Asia minor, the rise of the Persian empire, and the Ionian rebellion that all played a part in the conflicts started these wars. The end results however are the most important thing because they laid the groundwork for the golden age. During the 11th century the Greeks had flourishing colonies established in Asia minor.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greek Battles The Battle of Thermopylae, was a battle between the Greeks and the Persians. Thermopylae was a mountain pass which led to many Greek cities. It was a part of the second invasion of the Persian Empire. The Persians invaded Greek cities to control more land. The Persian Empire was led by Xerxes, he ordered the attack.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The desire for Persian kings such as Darius and Xerxes on their expeditions into Europe could stem from a great number of factors. The desire for more luxurious goods may have played a large role in the campaigns as Xerxes is described as refusing Athenian dates until he can take them himself without paying. Another motivation could be derived from the military tradition of the Persians, as each ruler was expected to campaign and be skilled fighters, somewhat forcing the hands of the Persian kings to continuously campaign and expand their boundaries. This paper however will focus on what seems to be the most prominent factor playing into the Persians desire to campaign into Europe, the rebellious uprisings along western Anatolia. These uprisings brought attention to the Persian kings that the poisonous relationship that the Greeks played in their influence over those in Anatolia, thus causing the Persians to attempt cut out the problem at the source by directly attacking the source of the uprisings, which in turn were a catalyst for the Greco-Persian wars.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, Darius followed his general advice and moved on to attack the Scythians territory (Herodotus, p.142). The Scythians soon learn of the Persian army and form a council of princes from all other nearby kingdoms to unite themselves against the Persian army. The assembled princes of the nation had divided opinions on this issue; some blamed the Scythians for bringing war into their territory and they should combat the Persian alone while others thought they should form an alliance(Herodotus, p.142). Ultimately, the Scythians were left alone to encounter Persian army Therefore, they decided to not stand in an open battle rather let the Persians chase them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain why it was so important, some backstory is required for the battle. Due to the change of government in the Ottoman empire a few years before, the Ottomans had gained the reputation of “The sick man of Europe”, due to political instability, military defeat and civil strife problems following nearly a century of decline. After a new figurehead…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salamis Research Paper

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenians had fled to Salamis after the Battle of Thermopylae in August, 480 BC, while the Persians occupied and burned their city. The Greek fleet joined them there in August after the indecisive Battle of Artemisium. The Spartans wanted to return to the Peloponnese, seal off the Isthmus of Corinth with a wall, and prevent the Persians from defeating them on land, but the Athenian commander Themistocles persuaded them to remain at Salamis, arguing that a wall across the Isthmus was pointless as long as the Persian army could be transported and supplied by the Persian navy. His argument depended on a particular interpretation of the oracle at Delphi, which, in typical Delphic ambiguity, prophesized that Salamis would "bring death to women's…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These ships would soon be put to the ultimate test when faced against their adversary, a huge Persian fleet of over 1000 ships. The location of this coming storm of ships and soldiers would meet at the infamous Salamis Bay for one of the biggest sea and land battles in history. Ancient Greek triremes outperformed Persians ships, which led to the victory at Salamis Bay because of their superior design, powerful weaponry, and the skilled seamanship of Athenian sailors. First, the Greeks and their triremes destroyed many enemy vessels and prevailed in the Battle of Salamis Bay because of their superior design.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thermopylae was a natural choke point and had been the site of other battles like that of the 300 Spartans (Taylor 123). Antiochus’ army is formed of 14,500 men including 10,000 of his own infantry, 500 cavalry and, 4,000 of the Aetolian leagues’ and other allies (Taylor 124). The Roman army of 22,000 engaged the Seleucid one by initially driving Antiochus’ allies from the mountains bordering the pass (Appian, S.18). Then the Roman army properly attacked the phalanx but before long the fleeing allies drove Antiochus’ army into disarray. Antiochus and his army became fearful and fled in total disorder (Appian, S.19).…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Salamis Summary

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Not only did Barry Strauss give a factual account of the battle of Salamis, he also provides an interesting narrative. When reading this monograph, it did not feel like reading a history book, but a novel that got even more interesting as the pages turned. The Battle of Salamis: The Naval Encounter that Saved Greece-and the Western Civilization provides an informative and intriguing account of the battle of Salamis in 480 B.C. This publication is an acceptable resource for students to learn and analyze the battle as well as the leaders, ships, and different tactics…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of his biggest rivals in the beginning of his public career was Aristides, who is said to have “always aimed at securing the utmost advantage for the state,” unlike Themistocles whose only concern was his own furtherance (Plutarch 79). After gaining enough influence, Themistocles had Aristides ostracized and also bribed Epicydes into declining the leadership of the Athenian forces, actions that create an image of a man driven by uncontrollable competitiveness and not by concern for the good of his people. With these two opponents out of the way, Themistocles was free to exercise his own schemes during the Persian wars. While Themistocles’ supervision did result in victory for the Greeks, it also enflamed his arrogance. After the war, Themistocles “carried his ambition to its furthest limit,” which created growing opposition towards himself (Plutarch 94).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Persian Wars between the Greeks and the Persians of the Achaemenid Empire at the beginning of the fifth century BC. They are triggered by the revolt of the Asian Greek cities against the Persian domination, the intervention of Athens in their favor causing retaliation. The two military expeditions of the Achaemenid sovereigns Darius I and Xerxes I constitute the main military episodes of this conflict; they are concluded by the spectacular victory of the European Greek cities led by Athens and Sparta. How did the Greeks win the war against the Persian? Firstly, we will explain the origins of the war.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Yarmouk Essay

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Battle of Yarmouk The Byzantines leadership by all accounts should have won the battle at Yarmouk in 636. Nevertheless, due to failed leadership, lack of knowledge of the enemy, and poor logistics the Byzantines were defeated by the Arab Muslims with a force much smaller but smarter than the Byzantines. Define the Subject The “Battle of Yarmouk” was a battle fought in Syria, in 636 AD, along the Yarmouk River in the Yarmouk valley, about 40 miles southeast of the Golan Heights. The Byzantines and the Arabs fought in this battle. The Byzantines Roman Emperor was Heraclius, who is reported as getting to old to command the battle himself sent Vahan the Armenian to be the overall field commander.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In The Iliad by Homer, the fate of the mortals is affected by the god’s interference in the war. Homer does not make it clear whether man or gods are in control of fate. The mortals’ decisions may affect their fate,but on the other hand, the gods change the fate of the war by giving bits of wisdom to the mortals to make decisions and help to protect people who are in danger. Though mortals can make decisions that alter fate, the gods uphold the idea that fate is inevitable in a mortal 's life and even though the immortals realize that each mortal has a specific fate, they still intervene in the battle to help certain people by sending muses and inspirations and protecting mortals from dying. The rest of fate is dependent on human free will…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays