Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man

Improved Essays
Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979) was a German philosopher and Marxist sociologist who was a member of The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. His works are still acclaimed by the public and they are mostly giving arguments against capitalism, modern technology and the entertainment culture amongst others because they represent, according to him, a form of social control. One of his most acclaimed work, One-Dimensional Man which was published in 1962. We have to keep in mind that he was writing at a time where the welfare State was growing and ordinary people were becoming richer. He offered a lot of arguments against both contemporary capitalism and Communist society of the Soviet Union in that work. It is a remarkable work in the sense where his …show more content…
The removal of capitalism as an example will bring a certain society back to an era where there were no laws or a society with high-democracy, low-capacity. We can now conclude this first point by saying that capitalism is not the root of our problems and it yields many advantages which are a result of our current political structures. If we are to get rid of capitalism, make sure that we will have to do the same with democracy as a political system cherished by so many because one cannot exist without the presence of the other one. The second argument we are going to explore is when Professor Marcuse discusses the nature of society. During his explanations, he used two very strong words to define it which were “dominant” and “controlling”. He said, “At its most advanced stage, domination functions as administration, and in the overdeveloped areas of mass consumption, the administered life becomes the good life of the whole, in the defense of which the opposites are united. This is the pure form of domination.”, then he prescribes us with a solution “Conversely, its negation appears to be the pure form of negation. All content seems reduced to the one abstract demand for the end of domination – the only truly revolutionary exigency, and the event that would validate the achievements of industrial civilization.”

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    A Texan with the wild temperament and extremely self-confident, C. Wright Mills were out spoken against his social scientific community. Earning his Ph. D in three years, while publishing articles during his academic years, Mills became a pioneer who showed the way in matters such as predicting a cascade of movements in the United States and elsewhere which is a new directional change. Even though not all his analyses were right, his conscious of organization making the difference in today’s world. Mills’ power elite model was one out three organizational sectors. These three sectors has become a larger scale of concentration of power.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What this means is that the capitalist mode of production may have empowered the individual because the capitalists had isolated them to produce their commodities, however the contradiction is that it resulted in chaos among the producers thus society failed to obtain any anarchy of production (299). As Engels argues, the driving force of the social anarchy of production transformed many men into proletarians and this driving force gave rise to the individual capitalist’s goal of perfection of large-scale industry (299). However it is this pursue of perfection that would render the individual labourer unnecessary in the capitalist mode of production. Thus here lies the link to the fundamental contradiction in capitalism. Furthermore, another contradiction that arises from the fundamental contradiction is that the chaos created in social structures is due to the rebellion of the mode of production on the mode of exchange.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In order to gain equality, a new social movement must either become part of the existing Capitalist sphere, or fail to find “naturality.” Ironically, the system that defines the acceptability of these new movements is quite possibly entirely unnatural, yet this does not negate the reality: Capitalism holds a monotony over social identity, and therefore progress made is only progress in relation to traditional Capitalism. Subsequently, there will never be a moment of genuine social transcendence until a separation from Capitalism is…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Structural Dependence of the State on Capital,” Przeworski and Wallerstein (1988) focus on identifying whether democracy is a political system that allows citizens to solve the inequalities created in their society by capitalism. Przeworski and Wallerstein analyze the theory of “structural dependence of the state on capital,” which states that all governments in capitalist societies are compelled to “respect and protect the essential claims” of owners of wealth in society (Przeworski and Wallerstein 1988 11). Assuming that the hypothesis of the theory is true, where the society of a capitalist nation is contingent on the “allocation of resources chosen by owners of capital,” the theory infers that the state must then depend on the owners…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What was the conflict? How did it start? The conflict is between East Berlin, which was part of East Germany and West Berlin, which was actually located belonged to West Germany. On a bigger scale this was a conflict between Communism VS.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dark Ages Dbq

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He believed that people were born good and equal. “... (W)e must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose [manage] of their possession and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature…” Also, that you are free but freedom always comes with a prices. He thinks that you have freedom but it sometimes comes with a consequence. “... for the society can never… lose the native [natural] and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be done by a settled legislative, and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it.”…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In modern thought, democracy is considered as the ideal form of governance; it is a tool to usher in freedom and progress to citizens of a state. While the term “democracy” is used liberally to describe a wide array of governing systems, it is assumed that most “democratic” governments share similar principles that highlight individual freedoms. Robert Dahl, in On Democracy, makes his case for the democratic system. Dahl argues throughout the book that democracy should not just be viewed as desirable; democracy is the most viable governing option for the modern state. Therefore, achieving the highest levels of democratization ought to be the goal of all governments that are considered democracies.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcuse was called to the military obligation; It was in the military where his political training started, in spite of the fact that amid this period his political inclusion was brief. The experience of war and the German Revolution drove Marcuse to an investigation of Marxism as he attempted to comprehend "the elements of private enterprise and colonialism, and also the disappointment of the German Revolution. Marcuse additionally needed to take in more about communism and the Marxian hypothesis of transformation so he might comprehend his own particular failure to relate to any of the significant Left gatherings around then. Marcuse was likewise ready to see both sides of the coin. That is, while workmanship exemplified progressive potential,…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Q1: What makes a state with a capitalist economy versus a state with a different economy different is that it is referred to as a free market economy. Capitalist states usually have a two class system within them where they have the owners (producers and distributors) and those who work for labor in exchange for currency. This kind of economy is ran by businesses owned by people. But this kind of job requires knowledge and training to gain the producing and distributing profession.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cold War: History and Advancements The Cold War still has great affects till this day be-cause of the conflicts between the countries that were in-volved, and the making of weapons that were used as threats to threaten other countries. Also the end results of the war which still continues till this day. Capital democracies such as the United States where peo-ple have a choice on how they and everyone has an equal amount of say about the decisions that affect their lives.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    At the very basic level, a democratic structure can be defined as an ‘institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote’ (Schumpeter 1942 cited in Menocal 2007). The positive relationship between prosperity and democracy has an enduring relationship in the subject of social sciences. Although there does exist a strong correlation, it does not necessarily mean causation.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Oligarchy Vs Capitalism

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Both capitalists and corporate oligarchy bring an enormous profit to the government, providing good economy/sort of economic stability and decreasing the unemployment rate. But the true democracy cannot exist in democratic countries if the corporate oligarchy and capitalists influence the government. I believe if capitalism would be the one economic system without corporate oligarchy, the life would be better. If talking about the true democracy, I think people have minimum influence if the group of elites has a control over the politics. I believe oligarchy is something negative, as in most cases, it is corrupted.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argumentative Essay about Economic Systems by: Dawson Simeroth Capitalism is defined by Webster's Dictionary as: "a way of organizing an economy so that the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) are owned by individual people and companies rather than by the government. " Capitalism is much more superior than socialism because it accommodates for both the needs of the individual person as well as the needs of the society as a whole. For example, capitalism allows the prices of all goods and services to be set by the market. One can observe this even today with the prices of certain goods rising and dropping due to supply and demand. Some might say that unstable prices make for an unstable economy.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social order is the foundation for all other rights, but yet this does not come from nature, but from convention. He criticizes the Natural Law for being too independent, working towards one’s own gain over others, instead of the unified push for the good of the general will. Yet he promises a man retains his independent rights when joining the Body Politic, just as all men are said to do. However, when it comes to his “might does not equal right” arguments, we are led to believe that a person is born with rights, natural rights, that cannot be taken away simply because someone has established some sort of power dynamic. Might does not equal right and just because someone is stronger does not imply anything about their capability to rule.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays