Henry V: Instinct Over Intellect

Improved Essays
Shakespeare and Henry V: Instinct Over Intellect
In Shakespeare's Henry V, the title character is a king renowned for his various strength as a leader. The Bishop of Canterbury, in conversation with another priest, attests to his skills as a speaker primarily. "The air," he says "is still" when the king speaks in "sweet and honeyed sentences" (l.i.51-53). Henry uses his talents as an orator to impress or to debate just as often as he uses them to persuade his enemy of something. In Act lll, scene i, Henry delivers a speech to his troops in the middle of the siege in Harfleur. This scene highlights King Henry's gifts as a speaker as he appeals to his soldiers’ emotions in rallying them for one final assault on the walls surrounding the city.
…show more content…
As King Henry is rallying his troops to fight alongside him, he summons the courage of his soldiers by alluding to their socioeconomic statuses. King Henry first does this is by calling on the noblemen to serve as examples to the commoners. While addressing his knights, Henry acknowledges their nobility and informs them of their inherent duties when he says, “Be copy now to men of grosser blood / And teach them how to war” (3.1.25-26). Here, Henry is telling the nobles to be leaders to those of a lower rank. The knights have a noble responsibility inherited by birth. This duty is an obligation, not a choice, and Henry reminds them of that. Furthermore, Henry commands his knights to teach the yeoman soldiers “how to war.” Like a father expects his son to watch over his younger brother, Henry expects these men to show the commoners their expertise on the battlefield. King Henry is then able to summon the courage of his common soldiers by speaking about their upbringings. He says to them, “show us …show more content…
Throughout his speech, Henry is urging the soldiers to forgo their human thoughts and rationale. For instance, King Henry alludes to the predatorial instincts of a big jungle cat when he says, “But when the blast of war blows in our ears / Then imitate the action of the tiger / Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood” (3.1.7-8). Henry understands that with war comes a certain savagery, and because of that, he needs his men to channel their most primitive behaviors. A wild animal does not think before it acts. Henry’s soldiers, when given the choice to fight or flight, need to remain still, summon up their courage, and face their threat. Henry believes that if the soldiers emulate the nature of a tiger, that of a wild, bloodthirsty beast, they will stifle their fears and perform better on the battlefield. Furthermore, Henry attempts to have the soldiers channel their inner hunting dog when he says, “I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips / Straining upon the start. The game’s afoot” (3.1.34-35). Whereas tigers kill to survive, greyhounds hunt for sport. Henry wants the soldiers to view the battle as a hare coursing, except the prize here is not wild game, it is the town of Harfleur. Similar to a hunting dog searching for wild rabbits, the soldiers need to have a nose for victory. Henry, in dehumanizing his men, is enabling the soldiers to act before they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Henry express that they are not weak. This strategy is an appeal to pathos, forcing the audience to face an emotional question that will give the readers different responses. By using pathos he persuades the audience to free Virginia from the British colonial…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scratching pain of the contact made him draw a long breath through his clinched teeth” (70). After taking this blow and lying about how he receives it, Henry has to live with the guilt of lying about how he got his mark of courage. The mark ironically becomes a mark of guilt and cowardice, instead of one with courage. Through irony, Crane constantly restates the point that the expectations of society have no real value on the battlefield, only the abilities of…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He spoke with affinity, avidity, passion, and showed an undeniable support to fight against the English government. He uses allusions, rhetorical questions, and metaphors to effectively persuade opponents and supporters of the Revolution to unite and fight the British for American independence. By using allusions to well-known works such as the bible and The Odyssey, Henry develops credibility as a well-informed and educated speaker. Alluding to the Bible, Henry tries to justify his assertion that the British have betrayed them long ago and warns the audience not “. . .…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry V's Speech Analysis

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry V demonstrates his ability to compose all of his men feel valued and equal by giving examples of achievements they’ll all have completed solely by fighting by his side. Henry V never once did single out a status when giving his speech. Henry talks only about everything that all the men have or will have in common by the end of the fight. Henry focuses on the positive issues that others will be compelled say when looking back at this battle. The speech was given to show the men how they’ll be seen in Henry’s eyes after fighting by his side, since Henry is the king and he has the ability to have a superior relationship with a diversity of people he looked up to by abounding, therefore, his opinion is one to have an effect on people.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henry then compares the blindness of some towards the tyranny of the British to sailors blindly following the call of a siren. He implies that they choose not to see the the threat the British place over the…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The speakers assure their armies that their triumph will be legendary and spoken of for years to come, and if they die in battle, their deaths will not be in vain. In “Speech to the Troops at Tilbury,” Queen Elizabeth states, “... We shall shortly have a famous victory.” In this line, she assures her people of their victory over the Spanish and confirms their upcoming glory, causing a wave of zealousness for the fight. In “Saint Crispin’s Day Speech,” King Henry says, “This story shall the good man teach his son” (39).…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Fleming was a youth that had wanted to enlist. Some of his personality traits are one that needs courage. He lacked courage that was needed for him during the war. This would come to him during the time of him facing the battles. Henry is an idealistic and completely self-absorbed teenager.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, he try’s to show them that Britain are not as honest as they make themselves out to be. He tells them, “Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare at your feet.” He says this to show that Britain cannot be trusted. Patrick Henry explains how everything they have been doing isn’t working, and they need to try a new strategy, and the best idea for them is war. He says, “We must fight, I repeat it sir, we must fight.”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Shakespeare personifies King Henry’s need to maintain control of the situation through rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?/ Shall we by treason an indent with fears/” This reveals to the audience that because of King Henry 's paranoia he needs to ask constant questions to assure himself that his followers are still loyal to him furthermore the rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?” serves the purpose of manipulating blunt into thinking that Mortimer is a traitorous coward. Shakespeare 's use of intimidating tone, religious allusion and rhetorical questions shows how paranoia leads individuals to manipulate politician situations in order to maintain control over power and leadership…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What ended up mattering most was Catherine. The goal of this paper is to elucidate these changes within Henry and those with whom he had relationships with. Concerning the war, Henry’s casual, careless attitude deteriorated throughout. In Book I, it’s apparent that he doesn’t care much about the war.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first rhetorical device Patrick Henry uses in his speech is ethos. An example of ethos in his speech says, "...number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not..." Ethos is credibility from…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Henry’s clever use of questioning, pathos, and audience exemplify this. Henry achieved in his speech…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He questions the strong men in his audience: “Why stand we here idle?” (6). Henry makes them ponder if the situation will ever get better if they just sit around, unwilling to fight. Patrick Henry also uses pronouns to include his audience, persuading them that the colonies as a whole can unite to fight the force of Great Britain. Patrick Henry argues for war because he claims that the colonies have worked together and “we have been trying,” (4) but it has not worked.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry will now have to go and fight in a war that is certain to happen. " Theme: The theme is courage because even is Henry know…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays