The Role Of Falstaff In King Henry IV

Improved Essays
Falstaff

Throughout the world, there have been many renowned writers that left their mark in literature such as, Christopher Marlowe and Robert Greene, but none more revered than Shakespeare. In his lifetime, Shakespeare composed many great plays with distinctive characters; however, one of the most noted characters of all is Falstaff in the The First Part of King Henry the Fourth (Henry IV). The essential reason Falstaff is timeless and able to continuously resonate with people is because of the presumed idea that he is a fool. Before this idea that Falstaff is indeed a fool, it is necessary to constitute the classifications precisely. The definition of a fool is "a silly or stupid person; a person who lacks judgment or sense" (Ammer). From the play Henry IV, Falstaff could be deemed many things: fat, thief, and liar, but after careful analysis, he is all but a fool. Falstaff uses manipulation, charm, and a representation of a father figure to warrant a certain level of trust and
…show more content…
He throws a reversed sense of charm to charm the prince’s mind into subtle submission. In one part, he begs Prince Hal to banish the other ruffians “but for sweet Jack Falstaff, kind Jack Falstaff, true Jack -Falstaff, valiant Jack Falstaff . . . Banish not him thy Harry’s company, / Banish not him thy Harry’s company” (Shakespeare ). Falstaff’s portrayal of himself as “sweet,” “kind,” “true,” and “valiant” rings hollow; meanwhile Falstaff is quite clearly a cowardly robber who loves to embellish. Nevertheless, the reiteration of his plea to Prince Hal to not banish him seems to display his request with a mark of seriousness and possibly sadness. He has intellectual power, he is quick, and knows how people function. He surrounds himself with people he can manipulate. This strategy with the Prince can only go so far because he is the future king to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Falstaff has been an audience favorite ever since the release of Henry IV Part I. This hyperbolical character lightens up the solemn undertone of this English History play with his humorous ways. At the final part of the play, his comical nature helps him gain the sympathy of all but Prince Harry, whom he shares a seemingly genuine friendship with. Shakespeare reveals the lack of sincerity in Hal and Falstaff’s friendship through two major literary devices: metaphor and meter, along with other minor literary elements. Throughout the first part of Henry IV, the sun is used as a recurring metaphor for Hal.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    " He was the one exasperated with Wylan for trusting people blindly, but seeing the princeling blaming himself, he wants to make him feel better. Wylan doesn't even seem to have heard him. "I'm the Prince. I have a dutty with my family and my country, I can't go around making stupid decisions.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Henry VIII was, during the younger part of his life, active and reportedly handsome, extremely vain, and a symbol for all things manly. He enjoyed accenting with doublets stuffed at the shoulders, duckbill shoes, and codpieces. He was also never lacking in an abundance of fur and jewels to showcase his wealth. He was also described as being the best-dressed sovereign in the world. Subsequently, his methods, such as slashing and puffing and stuffing sleeves and…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That juxtaposition of extremes also enables Shakespeare to convey a central theme of the play, the nature of true honour, represented by Hal, who embodies the happy medium between Falstaff and Hotspur. Hal, unlike Hotspur, enjoys diversions and humour, but not to the drunken, cowardly excess of his friend Falstaff. Hal draws the line between him and Falstaff, distinguishing between frivolity and ‘grey iniquities’. Hal didn’t take part in the Gadshill robbery since he didn’t want to be a ‘reverend vice’. He realises behind the humour accompanying Falstaff and others that he has a duty to the royal court, to be gallant and noble.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    King Henry Flaws

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that Henry is an good king. He does have flaws but there is almost never a story that has one perfect character. Henry’s flaws are sometimes hard to find but sometimes easy to see. He clearly makes non-Christian threats to people and people groups. For example in Act 3 Scene 3 Henry is speaking to the governor and he threatens to kill their babies, and men.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our lives are constantly shaped and influenced by hopes we want to achieve but may never come to pass. Similarly, we fear things and attempt to avoid them, but they never happen. Choices in life we make every day are constantly being influenced by hopes, dreams, and fears that never become actual. In the Shakespearean comedy Much Ado About Nothing, people let “nothing” influence their lives.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romeo and Juliet Essay Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare is a play written to show contrast and duality. Shakespeare includes literary devices involving detailed characters, language, and events to prove that everything has two sides and may not seem as it appears. Shakespeare creates vivid characters that capture your attention. However, the characters have two sides and are not what they seem to be. One example is that Lord Capulet seems to be a great father, who watches over his daughter and really cares for her.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Such an attempt to veil political motivations can be seen in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s (RSC) interpretation of Act 2, Scene 4, directed by Gregory Doran. Doran’s representation of this scene serves to present a dramatic, visual performance, but also to demonstrate his shared perspective of Shakespeare’s political views. The characterisation of Falstaff as a static character is a foil to King Henry, where the juxtaposition is apparent between the honourable and utilitarian yet politically ambiguous figures, versus the vulgar yet honest ‘human’. Moreover, Falstaff satirises King Henry IV’s legitimacy and how he presents himself, as he says, “Give me a cup of sack to make my eyes look red, that it may be thought I have wept, for I must speak in passion...”, the motif of ‘sack’ being associated with irresponsibility and frivolity as a result of Falstaff’s characterisation. Furthermore, Falstaff continues the meta-play, satirising the King’s way of speech through his role-playing: “I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also”.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Shakespeare personifies King Henry’s need to maintain control of the situation through rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?/ Shall we by treason an indent with fears/” This reveals to the audience that because of King Henry 's paranoia he needs to ask constant questions to assure himself that his followers are still loyal to him furthermore the rhetorical questions in “Shall our coffers/ then be emptied to redeem a traitor home?” serves the purpose of manipulating blunt into thinking that Mortimer is a traitorous coward. Shakespeare 's use of intimidating tone, religious allusion and rhetorical questions shows how paranoia leads individuals to manipulate politician situations in order to maintain control over power and leadership…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In almost every story since the beginning of human history, storytellers used certain tried and true characterization methods essential to any story: archetypes. Carl Jung first identified these universal archetypes and tropes prevalent in almost every story since The Odyssey. Jung believed that these archetypes existed in the psyches of human beings, which explains why people recognize archetypes so easily when hearing/reading a work of literature. However, as time went on, people noticed these archetypes and fictional works started to look indistinguishably similar. Evident through the archetypal storyline of the “Hero’s Journey”, Joseph Campbell deems that usually all ends well for the primary protagonist.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes the clearest method of defining what something should be is by juxtaposing it with something that is the opposite. In literature, authors often use the literary device of a foil to convey the central theme of the story. The foil is effective because it shows both the good and the bad versions of people that share the same status or position in life, yet they develop differently. Shakespeare uses foils in many of his plays to depict the theme, however, Henry V is one of the obvious plays that this is true of. Shakespeare communicates that humility is integral to a righteous leader through the use of the Dauphin as a foil to Henry in Henry V. The way that Henry and the prince of France interact with the men beneath them shows the quality of their leadership skills.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Character Foils In Hamlet

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Character foils are individuals who parallel each other, but have some dissimilar traits. As these individuals are comparable, their differing characteristics have heightened contrast, allowing for certain qualities to manifest themselves more fully. Within Hamet by William Shakespeare, foil characters serve the purpose of characterizing the protagonist. This characterization is witnessed three times when foils are employed to highlight Hamlets’ indecisiveness, sanity and remorsefulness. While many aspects of Hamlet’s character develop through foils, one feature that is revealed most prominently through foils is Hamlet’s indecisiveness.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kenneth Branagh's interpretation of scenes makes the viewer wonder why or what makes Jacques melancholy, and what it could represent in Shakespeare's mind. Jacques is perhaps one of the most interesting characters because he is always melancholy and depressed about everything without giving an explanation why. However, when Jacques meets the fool Touchstone in the forest, for once Jacques laughs and tells his "partners in banishment" how witty Touchstone's jokes are. This is a meaningful moment for Jacques because he reveals that freedom of speech drives his joy and enthusiasm towards being a fool. When Jacques says: "I must have liberty withal, as large a charter as the wind, to blow on whom I please, for so fools have," he explains that his desire to be a fool comes from the jester's license that grants a fool the privilege to say anything to anyone he wants without consequences (II.vii.47-49).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the entirety of Henry IV Part 1, by William Shakespeare, there is an emphasis on father-son relationships. The main protagonist, Hal, and the main antagonist, Hotspur, are both young men and as such they are still learning from their respective father figures. In Hal’s case, both Falstaff and his biological father King Henry IV, and for Hotspur, Northumberland. Each relationship has its merits and faults, and its own intricacies not seen in any of the other bonds. Though the the plot centers mainly around Hal and the king, each out these links are integral to understanding what happened and why.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Shakespeare’s works, the recurring obsession of obtaining honor is prominent throughout his plays. During the plays’ time periods, the only way to obtain honor is through fighting on the battlefield, but honor does not stop there. It spreads to the main characters’ way of life, affects the way they rule, and the decisions they make. The contrasting/ supporting characters even have an opinion on honor and use it to their advantage. Honor is defined as high respect or esteem, or honor may be viewed as a privilege.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays