Henry David Thoreau's Resistance To The Civil Rights Movement

Great Essays
Our governing factors may not always be right, but few have the courage to take a stand and step outside their comfort zone. Government assumes numerous parts in the lives of people, some great and obviously some awful. Despite the fact that some concur with how our representing body handles unjustifiable circumstances numerous don't. A few authentic figures, for example, Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. stood firm for the privileges of americans and changed the lives for some eras to come. Martin Luther King Jr. states that the state ought to regard the individual, the part of an ethical individual is to contradict foul play in the public arena, and Thoreau trusts the administration exists by the assent of the individuals for the up most reason of executing their will.

Henry D. Thoreau's original paper Resistance to
…show more content…
in spite of the fact that some concur with how our representing body handles treacherous circumstances numerous don't. A few of authentic figures, for example, Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. stood firm for the privileges created by the founding fathers of americans and changed the lives for some eras to come.The thoughts displayed by Thoreau in 1849 were pretty much as pertinent to the Abolitionist Movement as they were to the Civil Rights Movement. The technique and procedure of his common noncompliance appeared to be copied by King more than 100 years after the fact. His hypotheses and thinking on the theme of out of line laws appeared to catalyze the contentions utilized by King amid the Civil Rights Movement. The contention for Brown v. Leading body of Education, as pursued by Warren, appeared to create in light of the speculations of Thoreau. By and large, the most noteworthy activities of the Civil Rights Movement, that prompt it achievement, can be credited to Thoreau's thoughts as stipulated in Civil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau An Effective Argument Thoreau presents and effective argument in his work Resistance to Civil Government. Evidence of this is provided by use of reasoning to explain whether these events deserve support of defiance, use of specific detail about the issues, and use of strategies to appeal to the reader's emotion and imagination. Thoreau has countless instances in his work that prove effective in persuading his readers to favor his ideals, and each individual that study his work should use his style in their own writing. Many issues are presented in Thoreau’s essay and each were given thorough explanation as to whether they deserve our support or defiance. Thoreau explains the poll tax, highway tax, and church sums accurately to his readers, then gives us his stance on each matter.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas and the moral views seen among Thoreau and King differed mainly because of the timeline in which the essay and the letter was wrote. Thoreau lived during a time when negotiation was non-existent that is he met the government ,”I meet this American government, or its representative, the State government, directly, and face to face, once a year- no more- in the person of its tax-gatherer..” (Thoreau). But on the other hand the King had the capability to gather groups and strength themselves which did not have any violence this led to increased their success in the Civil rights movement. King had four basic steps for his nonviolent campaign,” collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification;…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, the author, Thoreau, uses Transcendentalism to attempt to inspire and persuade the reader to believe a certain point he is trying to get across. Thoreau writes, “Under a government which impressions any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.” This quote inspires me because I had never realized that justness can be seen in this way: Since some laws are not just, following every law would be unjust as well. I originally thought that following every rule would be just, but when thinking back throughout history I realized that that is not correct. To me, this quotation means that under a just government where there are unjust laws, the man is unjust by following these laws, and belongs in a prison with…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The text above was chosen because it spoke to the message I wanted to impose on my audience. Henry David Thoreau, argues that men should be free from government; I argue that one’s neighborhood heavily impacts the person they become; but we both argue with passion and a confident tone, making us very similar in our approach to argumentative writing. In Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, this passage most encourages me to understand his argument, not because I agree with it, but because it most evokes logos and pathos. Each of these, I would like to evoke within my argument to create passionate, and logical arguments. Thus I speak passionately, to impose with in my writing that I genuinely care about what I write; and I speak confidently to instill a sense of credibility and certainty in my…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In A Civil Action you witness how different characters lived their life’s with different principles. There are three characters that can be examined by Henry David Thoreau essay “Life Without Principle”, which are Jan Schlichtmann, Jerry Facher, and Anne Anderson. Jan Schlichtmann, is a successful personal-injury attorney and lives his life by using his clients’ injuries and pain in order to advance financially. Jerry Facher, who was also an attorney, knew how to win a case. He lived his life always saying that people could be bought out.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern society, peacefully resisting to unjust laws is almost an everyday thing. All around the globe today, we see prime examples of nation’s citizens peacefully demonstrating their opinions and believes to their ruling governments. That being said, civil disobedience and peacefully resisting to laws positively impact a free society. By peacefully resisting, societies come together to achieve a common goal, which is to fight back against their ruling governments due to unjust and unfair laws that negatively impact the governed.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau, however is not so optimistic. He believes that what ever happens in Atlanta does not affect other people or in that matter another city that has nothing to do with it. He also believes that one person's vote or participation can make a difference. Thoreau holds that majority and nothing can change that.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau and Civil Disobedience I, myself, like many citizens have a cynical view of the government. I am skeptical of their morals and often question if their decisions are an act of self-interest. Additionally, the average citizen is often also dissatisfied by the response of the government. Nevertheless, citizens want the government to serve their needs by being active and responsive; however, how can it do that if it can’t accurately assess what the public wants. The government cannot serve its citizens if they don’t speak up.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is in our human nature to fight for what we believe to be right, and we do so in different ways; Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. both were empowering men who had their similarities and differences; but what exactly? Henry David Thoreau was a man who took a stand by refusing to pay his poll tax, being imprisoned due to it, and writing books and essays, his most famous being, Walden: or Life in the Woods, which greatly encouraged people to live simpler, and On the Duty of Civil Disobedience , which presented his views on taxes, slavery, and the Mexican-American War. According to the “Glossary of Nonviolence” from The King Center, civil disobedience is “The act of openly disobeying an unjust immoral or unconstitutional law as…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Its principles have guided many significant figures, including Mahatma Gandhi, and have also been the basis for a myriad of civil rights’ movements throughout history. In the beginning, Thoreau uses forthright and almost cynical diction to describe the present government, comparing a standing army to an “arm” of the government, in which arm can be taken to symbolize force alone: an arm is lacking a brain or head, and therefor intelligence. Thoreau uses this analogy to imply that the army, and furthermore the government, utilize only brute force. Additionally, he explains that the government can easily be “abused” and “perverted.” This use of negative diction causes the reader to mentally associate the government with these evil and corrupt actions.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau was a simple man, one who decided that living on his own in the woods was the only way to reach clarity. His philosophy is one that has changed the way that many people have looked at themselves and their place in society. However his society is a thing of the past. His society is one that had different values and norms. Stating that possessions create complication is obsolete, although his ideas are very relevant in terms of obsession, society has created a way for people to connect with the world around them and live fuller lives.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay Civil Disobedience is an essay written by Henry D. Thoreau in 1849. In his essay he uses rhetorical question to engage his audience, and he uses those questions to make a statement how a government should be run. Thoreau is quoted in the paper saying “I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least". Using this argument, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions to prompt the reader into thinking of the idea of rebellion. They are used well in the essay, because they display his pathos, logos, and ethos.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay “Civil Disobedience” argues that American citizens should not be loath to disobey their corrupt and useless government, using metaphor as a rhetorical device to prove his point and provide a call to action for readers. In the essay, Thoreau describes the government as a corrupt, immoral, and often useless agent, and strongly criticizes the American population for following it so blindly. He encourages readers to act in protest of their unjust government, urging them to act with their consciences and not based on what the law dictates; he also insists that they engage in civil disobedience, and refuse to pay certain taxes. By using metaphor in the essay, Thoreau makes the piece more readable and relatable,…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays