Ibsen hints that the internal conflicts within the characters create a family breakdown. Written in Denmark in 1879, Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House widely known for its critical attitude toward 19th-century marriage standards, stimulated extraordinary controversy at the time, as it finishes up with the main character, Nora, abandoning her husband and children because she wanted to truly discover herself. Many internal thoughts and decisions made by Nora and Krogstad separate the Helmer’s family. Nora chooses Torvald over her father when they are both dying, creating an inverted family, the internal selfishness and greed employs a source of separation, Ibsen depicts contrast of Nora and Torvald submissively by their moral beliefs and Nora’s desire
…show more content…
Its interesting to note that, this took place before the time of the book, yet has such a big impact on the main conflict of the plot. By her choosing her husband over someone that helped birth her, she essentially decides “family” over her true family, going against the postmodern views being adopted at the time of Ibsen writing this book. Nora says, “...sick as he was, that my husband’s life was in danger. I could not tell him. That was impossible” (66). This employs the idea that Nora cares more for her lover than her father, which when really thought about is very backwards when using common logic and reasoning to justify her decision. Her father had been with her since birth and cared for her until she marries Torvald, yet she still deems him as more important than her father. This marks the start of the “flip” of the family, meaning the role switch at the end of the novel. Nora essentially disconnects from Torvald and thinks independently on her decision to leave her family, which was also internally decided. Nora realizes what Torvald’s true colors were and explains, “The way I am now, I am no wife for you” (113), which once again sparked controversy because divorce was so much of a rarity at the time of its publication. Nora transforms into the dominate spouse of the marriage abandoning the marriage roles of the late 19th century and her decision to choose “family” over her …show more content…
Nora, Krogstad, Torvald, etc. all desire certain objects, items and even people in order to obtain their happiness, which of course has correct reasoning, but this actually causes more separation in each respective relationship. Specifically Torvald, separates himself from the Helmer’s by using the forgery situation as blackmail in order to “make sure that [he] keep[s] [his] position in the bank” (63). Krogstad was willing to put an entire family with children in danger of being ostracized, rather than help them or not even mention the situation, in order to keep his job that he could possibly lose, which obviously he decides this selfishly, with no other motive but himself. Because of Krogstad bringing the forgery to Nora and only Nora, Torvald did not discover this until later, which sparked the separation of the lovers. Because of the secretive nature that Nora displays throughout, Torvald gives a person to blame, which in this situation would and only could be her. Directly, the selfishness of Krogstad specifically, separates the marriage of the Torvald’s by the blackmailing of Nora’s forgery in order for him to obtain what he
Its interesting to note that, this took place before the time of the book, yet has such a big impact on the main conflict of the plot. By her choosing her husband over someone that helped birth her, she essentially decides “family” over her true family, going against the postmodern views being adopted at the time of Ibsen writing this book. Nora says, “...sick as he was, that my husband’s life was in danger. I could not tell him. That was impossible” (66). This employs the idea that Nora cares more for her lover than her father, which when really thought about is very backwards when using common logic and reasoning to justify her decision. Her father had been with her since birth and cared for her until she marries Torvald, yet she still deems him as more important than her father. This marks the start of the “flip” of the family, meaning the role switch at the end of the novel. Nora essentially disconnects from Torvald and thinks independently on her decision to leave her family, which was also internally decided. Nora realizes what Torvald’s true colors were and explains, “The way I am now, I am no wife for you” (113), which once again sparked controversy because divorce was so much of a rarity at the time of its publication. Nora transforms into the dominate spouse of the marriage abandoning the marriage roles of the late 19th century and her decision to choose “family” over her …show more content…
Nora, Krogstad, Torvald, etc. all desire certain objects, items and even people in order to obtain their happiness, which of course has correct reasoning, but this actually causes more separation in each respective relationship. Specifically Torvald, separates himself from the Helmer’s by using the forgery situation as blackmail in order to “make sure that [he] keep[s] [his] position in the bank” (63). Krogstad was willing to put an entire family with children in danger of being ostracized, rather than help them or not even mention the situation, in order to keep his job that he could possibly lose, which obviously he decides this selfishly, with no other motive but himself. Because of Krogstad bringing the forgery to Nora and only Nora, Torvald did not discover this until later, which sparked the separation of the lovers. Because of the secretive nature that Nora displays throughout, Torvald gives a person to blame, which in this situation would and only could be her. Directly, the selfishness of Krogstad specifically, separates the marriage of the Torvald’s by the blackmailing of Nora’s forgery in order for him to obtain what he