Henri Poincaré's The Nature Of Mathematical Reasoning

Improved Essays
In “The Nature of Mathematical Reasoning,” Henri Poincaré argues that mathematical facts are synthetic and a priori, because we can see the principle of induction is true by non-analytic methods. Exponents of logicism, such as Carl Hempel, would disagree with Poincaré because they would see induction as following analytically from the definition of natural numbers. However, this response fails to fully address the argument, because Hempel’s logical approach cannot capture human intuition about the infinity of the natural numbers. To show the synthetic a priori nature of mathematical statements, Poincaré distinguishes between general and particular statements about the natural numbers, arguing that the former are synthetic, while the latter …show more content…
Intuitively, the natural numbers are an infinite collection of objects, which we know exist because we can imagine how the process of starting at zero and taking successors continues forever; it is then evident that the principle of mathematical induction applies to this collection. In order to prove that the process of taking successors continues without end, Hempel is forced to take the existence of infinity as axiomatic. However, the axiom of infinity cannot be a mere logical law. We can imagine a self-consistent universe containing only finitely many objects (we can even imagine one with numbers that add and multiply, as in modular arithmetic); we cannot imagine a self-consistent universe that violates a genuine logical law, such as (p and q) implies p. We know that an infinity of objects exists, not through mere logic, but because we can imagine the infinite process of taking successors, using precisely the same intuitions that Poincaré uses to justify mathematical induction. In general, assuming the existence of infinities is fraught with danger, as Russell’s paradox shows, so doing so cannot be meaningless and analytic. We can legitimately accept the axiom of infinity, not because it is an analytic tautology, but because we have a special ability to imagine the …show more content…
Hempel does admit this: in a footnote, he states that his definitions do not reflect “what everybody has in mind” when they refer to the natural numbers, but they do give a means of “interpreting coherently and systematically” our “statements in science and everyday discourse.” However, the disconnect between his definition and what we mean by natural numbers is in actuality a serious blow to his project. Statements about our natural numbers are synthetic, not analytic; even if statements about Hempel’s natural numbers were analytic, the correspondence between statements about his numbers and statements about our numbers would be a synthetic fact, not an analytic one. The process of using induction to can be understood using Poincaré’s infinite chain of syllogisms, but not Hempel’s logic; as Poincaré says, “the difference must be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To conclude to this, one has to understand the existence and nature of the finite and infinite. We know the existence of the finite because we are finite and have extension and limits. We know the existence of the infinite even though we do not understand it because it has extension like us,…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that St. Anselm’s ontological argument is not adequate in proving the existence of God. First I will discuss his ambiguous use of the term “God”. Then, I will move on to analyze the term “greatest” made in his premises. Lastly, I will also criticize Anselm's argument by demonstrating that Anselm’s reply to Gaunilo’s objections are unconvincing. Anselm was the first one who developed the ontological argument, an argument for God’s existence based on reason, not on physical evidence.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be examining the different views pertaining to the cosmological argument for the existence of God as discussed by Bertrand Russell and Fr. Copleston. I will be agreeing with Lord Russell’s views that the cosmological argument has a few inherent problems and contradictions that are difficult to overcome. First, I will look at Russell's assessment on his points of necessary and analytic propositions as well as his belief that Copleston’s argument on contingency is a fallacy of composition. I will then concur with these ideas and offer my thinking as to why this opinion is more convincing than its counterpart.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Math Autobiography

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This thus makes me see and understand the beauty and practicality of mathematics, and why theoretical mathematics is…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This idea of infinite reward is crucial to understanding the argument of chance because if any benefit is considered unending, then even a slight chance of possibility makes it reasonable to wager in favor. The opposite is considered for the final possibility, for if we do not believe in God, and He does in fact exist, then we will experience infinite loss with eternity in hell. Using the same logic as before, we see it is best to never take a bet that has even a remote possibility of bringing infinite torture and pain. After weighing the consequences of each possibility, it is clear that we should always say God exists. Only a fool would bet against this because the stakes are so high.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Honors Algebra 2

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people measure time in days. I measure it in electrons. Another day passes. Commerce starts and halts. People rise and sleep.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument v. Pascal’s Wager In this paper, I will be describing Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager and then contrast the differences between the two. These two arguments help to determine the existence of God. There are three norms of belief: ordinary belief, religious belief, and faith seeking understanding. The norms of ordinary belief are based on sufficient evidence to prove it is true.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes: The Special Causal Principle and the Existence of God In the 3rd Meditation, Descartes concludes that the he is a thinking thing and continues by determining whether there is anything that exist outside of him. Descartes then provides an argument which aim is to determine whether God exist, and this is presented as an argument for the existence of God based on an idea. In this, the Special Causal Principle arises and well as the concept of “clear and distinct ideas”. The aim of this paper is to ascertain whether the argument makes use of the two principles by critically evaluating the argument based on the idea of God.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is indication that belief does not have to be verifiable. There are some ideas that religion may not be accurate, however that is how someone applies their faith into practice. It is believed that belief depends on the specific individual. For example, belief can be applied through personal experience of how God has been faithful in their life or others’ life. In the article, “The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God” explains about how many philosophers of religion, have confirm the existence of God and also have not confirmed the existence of God.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Induction and Induction Without a Problem are two similar writings both talking about induction and how it affects the way we believe. Though they may both talk about induction and their similarities, there are also a few differences between the two stories. The main question being do you need scientific support for induction? In my opinion you do, because without the support, you base it off knowledge and knowledge can misguide you at times.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica: Proofs for the Existence of God, is a thirteenth century collection of five deductive arguments that, as the name suggests, supposedly prove the existence of God. In these arguments, or proofs, as Aquinas calls them, there is the assumption that there are some things that only God is capable of making happen – such as motion and cause - and ergo, God has to exist for these things to exist. Aquinas' first argument for the existence of God is that of the 'Unmoved Mover', which draws from Aristotle's ideas of acutality and potentiality to summarise that some things are in motion, but they cannot move themselves, a mover is required. Similarly, Aquinas' second argument, the argument of the first cause, states that some things are caused, and for this to happen they must be caused by something else, a 'causer' so to speak. This essay will assert the argument that whilst neither of these arguments are necessarily invalid, both of them are unsound, as although the logic itself has validity, the…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falsificationism Karl Popper asserts that the scientific status of a theory is derived from that theories potential for refutation. Theories outlining experimental results that (if observed) could refute the theory are classified as scientific. Theories that lack this content are classified as pseudoscience. Popper uses this distinction to preface his scientific view: falsificationism.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fundamental Theorem of Calculus The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus evaluate an antiderivative at the upper and lower limits of integration and take the difference. This theorem is separated into two parts. The first part is called the first fundamental theorem of calculus and states that one of the antiderivatives of some function may be obtained as the integral of the function with a variable bound of integration. The second part of the theorem, called the second fundamental theorem of calculus, states that the integral of a function over some interval can be computed by using any one of its infinitely many antiderivatives.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3.8. DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH “A deductive approach is concerned with developing a hypothesis (or hypotheses) based on existing theory, and then designing a research strategy to test the hypothesis” (Wilson, 2010:7) Monette et al (2005: 34) further explains deductive approach by the means of hypotheses, which can be derived from the propositions of the theory. In other words, deductive approach is concerned with deducting conclusions from premises or propositions. “Deduction begins with an expected pattern that is tested against observations, whereas induction begins with observations and seeks to find a pattern within them” (Babbie, 2010: 52). Is has been stated that “deductive means reasoning from the particular to the general.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays