Did you know that helicopter rescues can save a lot of lives, but end them at the same time? People, if climbing a mountain, must be experienced, have gumption, and resiliant. If a person falls off, a helicopter will come and try to rescue them. Should the society allow these savings? The right to helicopters should not be allowed, because, some people do not have the skill level and, more than one person can die on a helicopter rescue.
The first reason people do not have the right to helicopters, is because some people know the risks of climbing, but still do it. In source 2 titled “Why Everest” explains that the climbers are experienced, but are they experienced enough? As stated in lines 42-44, “They might not be skilled enough… may not know a lot about mountaineering.” This shows that a lot of people are not skilled enough. This also shows that the people will not admit to not knowing enough about climbing therefore falling on the mountain and that is their own fault. The people who disagree with me might say, what if the climber might be skilled enough, and has all the training, but what if they slip and fall? If they are very skilled then they should know about the risks of …show more content…
In source 3 named, “ Ranger Killed During Rescue of Climbers…” emphasises that helicopter pilots can die when saving other people. As stated in lines 4-6,”. Nick Hall fell 3700 feet to his death...helping two climbers”. This was very brave although this did take his life, this shows that sometimes more lives can be taken than needed. This also shows that helicopters are very dangerous to pilot because they might get hurt or worse. My opponents can say, the pilots are highly skilled and very unlikely to make a mistake. This is incorrect because there is a small margin for error and if they meet that small margin, people will get hurt. This means that helicopter rescues should not be allowed because helicopter rescues are a danger to the person they are rescuing and
The first reason people do not have the right to helicopters, is because some people know the risks of climbing, but still do it. In source 2 titled “Why Everest” explains that the climbers are experienced, but are they experienced enough? As stated in lines 42-44, “They might not be skilled enough… may not know a lot about mountaineering.” This shows that a lot of people are not skilled enough. This also shows that the people will not admit to not knowing enough about climbing therefore falling on the mountain and that is their own fault. The people who disagree with me might say, what if the climber might be skilled enough, and has all the training, but what if they slip and fall? If they are very skilled then they should know about the risks of …show more content…
In source 3 named, “ Ranger Killed During Rescue of Climbers…” emphasises that helicopter pilots can die when saving other people. As stated in lines 4-6,”. Nick Hall fell 3700 feet to his death...helping two climbers”. This was very brave although this did take his life, this shows that sometimes more lives can be taken than needed. This also shows that helicopters are very dangerous to pilot because they might get hurt or worse. My opponents can say, the pilots are highly skilled and very unlikely to make a mistake. This is incorrect because there is a small margin for error and if they meet that small margin, people will get hurt. This means that helicopter rescues should not be allowed because helicopter rescues are a danger to the person they are rescuing and