Heidi Stevens Only Children Essay

In an article entitled “Only Doesn’t Mean Lonely” in The Chicago Tribune, Heidi Stevens discusses the only child. Stevens argues that only children show no overmuch spoiled and aberrant than the ones who have siblings, furthermore, they are even more fully-developed. On the one hand, she asserts that by being the only child, children can grow more independent and autonomous, on the other hand, she explains that only children is not lonely because they own plenty of mates with whom they can relate. Nevertheless, Stevens concludes that even it is fabulous that being the only child is wonderful, they can still obtain numerous benefits from being independence without any sibling.
I disagree with Stevens’s view that it is faultless to be the only child at present. As far as I am concerned, there is no denying that the only child in a family could get the whole love and all the focus from his parents. However, overmuch love is detrimental to a child’s advancement. In Heidi Stevens’s article, she admits that only children is still …show more content…
Stevens claims that, “Study after study proves only children are no more spoiled, lonely or maladjusted than their peers who have siblings.” As for a child who are not the single child in the family, everything he gets need to be distributed to siblings, which evaluates their unselfish trait. In case of my experience, I have a younger brother, and I was taught to share with him. At first, I was not willing to do that. However, I finally gave in to my mother’s despotism. With age, I gradually understand what sharing means to me. If I didn’t have a younger brother, will I still obtain a deep comprehension about how essential sharing is? Only if a person considers of others, can he get real mates, and can gain support when he is in trouble. Therefore, I firmly believe that getting along with siblings makes people attach importance to