When Lovborg enters, he addresses her with reverence and familiarity. He softly exclaims, “Hedda Gabler!” (Ibsen II). The use of her maiden name and his gentle adoration suggests the memory of a past, passionate relationship, one in which Hedda was comfortable. However, this familiar addressal threatens Hedda’s sense of duty and individuality. Ibsen specifies his intent in using Hedda’s maiden name: “It was to indicate that Hedda as a personality is regarded as her father’s daughter... I principally wanted to depict human beings, human emotions, and human desires, upon a groundwork of certain social conditions and moral principles of the present day” (Innes 107). Ibsen intends to illustrate the confining nature of society. Because Lovborg uses Hedda’s maiden name, he limits her to the strict definition of “her father’s daughter,” rather than Hedda the individual. Thus, the social principles threaten Hedda’s free will. She retaliates by dismissing Lovborg’s forwardness, and confirming that she is indeed married. But her actions are contradictory; although
When Lovborg enters, he addresses her with reverence and familiarity. He softly exclaims, “Hedda Gabler!” (Ibsen II). The use of her maiden name and his gentle adoration suggests the memory of a past, passionate relationship, one in which Hedda was comfortable. However, this familiar addressal threatens Hedda’s sense of duty and individuality. Ibsen specifies his intent in using Hedda’s maiden name: “It was to indicate that Hedda as a personality is regarded as her father’s daughter... I principally wanted to depict human beings, human emotions, and human desires, upon a groundwork of certain social conditions and moral principles of the present day” (Innes 107). Ibsen intends to illustrate the confining nature of society. Because Lovborg uses Hedda’s maiden name, he limits her to the strict definition of “her father’s daughter,” rather than Hedda the individual. Thus, the social principles threaten Hedda’s free will. She retaliates by dismissing Lovborg’s forwardness, and confirming that she is indeed married. But her actions are contradictory; although