Published in 1906, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is the story of one man’s journey into a landscape of physical and psychological darkness. Inspired by an actual trip the author made to the Belgian Congo in 1890, Charlie Marlow is the main character in this novella, and he embarks on a journey through the heart of the African jungle with the intention of enlightening the “savages” who live there, but later his quest darkens Marlow’s own heart much more than it enlightens the “savages” that live in the remote area cut off from civilization. Partly the terrible experience both Conrad and Marlow suffer, is the result of greed and unregulated capitalism. While Marlow thinks he has pure motives for making the trip, really the search for wealth
…show more content…
Even the death of a native does not seem to move them. Regardless of the cause of death, Marlow compares the death of a native to the horror of rusting machinery and considers it a tragedy but not a human tragedy. However, by the third part of the novella, Marlow sees the brutal truth behind the actions of the company he works for, and he has come to understand the “savage” nature of this corporation as well as his own savage nature. He begins to identify with the natives and is envious of the simplistic lives the lead versus the lives of the immoral and convoluted Europeans. David Olusoga discusses a slave owner and the son of a slave owner Edward Long and his ideas about Africans and black people. These ideas were accepted as being not only right but scientifically true at the time. Long comes to the conclusion that Africa is backwards and the cause of everything evil in nature. His racial slurs were easily accepted at the time because he finds a justification for colonialism rather than slavery, though under these conditions the difference is in the name only. In connection to the text, Conrad’s deception of the colonization and leadership in Heart of Darkness does not differ greatly from David Olusoga’s portrayal of Edward Long’s reign. In Joseph Conrad’s case, Mr. Kurtz can be compared to Long because he also believes dominating the local population serves a greater good, no …show more content…
This is the path to oppression and even genocide. The colonists in Heart of Darkness waste no time in getting down to the business of exploiting the Belgian Congo, Africa and put many of their men to work stealing the countries natural resources. These men are not sympathetic and take no mercy on the natives whom they order around like slaves. During his newly assigned quest, Charlie Marlow learns that they corruption of colonization, the power of racism, and the seduction of deception have become the basis by which his people have justified their criminal activities. He sees his fellow Europeans taking advantage of the “savages” in their own savage way – contradicting the very image of being “civilized” on which they pride themselves. With the use of David Olusago and Cobus Pienaar’s articles, we can see the triangle of racism, colonization, and deceit are put into a different context outside of the novella; proving that the themes inside are universal. Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is his representation of his own journey through the Congo and through his characters we see that this journey is not one in which people are enlightened, but one that submerges them into a consuming darkness that can change a man
Even the death of a native does not seem to move them. Regardless of the cause of death, Marlow compares the death of a native to the horror of rusting machinery and considers it a tragedy but not a human tragedy. However, by the third part of the novella, Marlow sees the brutal truth behind the actions of the company he works for, and he has come to understand the “savage” nature of this corporation as well as his own savage nature. He begins to identify with the natives and is envious of the simplistic lives the lead versus the lives of the immoral and convoluted Europeans. David Olusoga discusses a slave owner and the son of a slave owner Edward Long and his ideas about Africans and black people. These ideas were accepted as being not only right but scientifically true at the time. Long comes to the conclusion that Africa is backwards and the cause of everything evil in nature. His racial slurs were easily accepted at the time because he finds a justification for colonialism rather than slavery, though under these conditions the difference is in the name only. In connection to the text, Conrad’s deception of the colonization and leadership in Heart of Darkness does not differ greatly from David Olusoga’s portrayal of Edward Long’s reign. In Joseph Conrad’s case, Mr. Kurtz can be compared to Long because he also believes dominating the local population serves a greater good, no …show more content…
This is the path to oppression and even genocide. The colonists in Heart of Darkness waste no time in getting down to the business of exploiting the Belgian Congo, Africa and put many of their men to work stealing the countries natural resources. These men are not sympathetic and take no mercy on the natives whom they order around like slaves. During his newly assigned quest, Charlie Marlow learns that they corruption of colonization, the power of racism, and the seduction of deception have become the basis by which his people have justified their criminal activities. He sees his fellow Europeans taking advantage of the “savages” in their own savage way – contradicting the very image of being “civilized” on which they pride themselves. With the use of David Olusago and Cobus Pienaar’s articles, we can see the triangle of racism, colonization, and deceit are put into a different context outside of the novella; proving that the themes inside are universal. Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is his representation of his own journey through the Congo and through his characters we see that this journey is not one in which people are enlightened, but one that submerges them into a consuming darkness that can change a man