Healthy Inequality Summary

George Will's article "Healthy Inequality" presents a contentious viewpoint that defends inequality as a natural and necessary aspect of society, particularly in the realm of higher education. While Will advocates for a meritocratic system, his argument overlooks the detrimental effects of entrenched inequality on access, equity, and social justice. By critically examining Will's assertions and drawing upon scholarly articles that emphasize the importance of promoting equity and social justice in higher education, it becomes evident that his stance is flawed and fails to address the systemic barriers that hinder progress towards a fair and inclusive educational landscape. Will's argument hinges on the notion that inequality, particularly in educational attainment, is not only …show more content…
Furthermore, Kezar and Posselt's (2023) work on higher education administration highlights the critical need for leadership that prioritizes social justice and equity. By challenging existing power structures and promoting inclusive policies, administrators can work towards creating a more equitable higher education system. In conclusion, while George Will's argument may highlight the importance of personal responsibility in health outcomes, it overlooks the systemic factors that contribute to inequality. By addressing only individual choices and behaviors, his argument fails to provide a comprehensive solution to the complex issue of health disparities. To truly address health inequality, we must consider the broader social, economic, and political factors that shape health outcomes and work towards creating a more equitable healthcare system for all. George Will's argument also fails to adequately address the complex issues of equity and social justice in higher