Legal Aspects of U. S. Health Care System Administration
The U S health care administration, there are numerous medical laws, for instances federal, state as well as local laws. The administrator should know these laws because they will be communicating with executive professionals at all levels. The health administrator is unknown to Well Care Hospital, and the hospital the past six months has been underneath a governed by investigation for breach of medical submission. It is crucial that the chief administrator is apprehensive about the significance of his or her behavior in the health care surroundings; understanding the margins of ethics and medical behavior. It describes four elements necessary in order for a plaintiff, to demonstrate …show more content…
Duty to care is the initial element that handles the care that the respondent (i.e. doctor, nurse) liable to the patient. Whether or not it was an emergency, the doctor is duty-bound to treat the patient, but they are not compelled to treat every individual. If the doctors do treat them, he or she has a contract which is called doctor-patient relationship, and should provide a significant standard of care. This states that the doctor ought to give the same principle, care, and ability that an in the same manner that trained physician would give under the comparable conditions. The physician is foreseeable to perform the identical duties that a rational and judicious doctor would perform. If the physicians breach the standard of care, he or she could be accountable for negligence (Fremgen, 2009).
The breach of duty is next element one must show that breach of duty of care caused harm, and proof of damages as a result of the circumstances failure to comply to or the departure from a required obligation due to an individual (Pozgar, …show more content…
After court, Well Care Hospital was proven innocent of any medical compliance, because the patient did not return back to the medical facility for treatments, and medication was provided to take, but the individual did not return to back the hospital and declined to take the medication. The court rule Well Care Hospital not liable for the charge of the patient. The Governing Board and the CEO were elated about the outcome. Most of all, the medical administrator was pleased that this litigation was finally finish. The lesson learned is that employee had to be careful when handling patients and their family. The health administrator behaviors meetings with the employee tow a month. In the conference they conduct workshops and when over the policies and procedures handbook (Pozgar, 2012
The U S health care administration, there are numerous medical laws, for instances federal, state as well as local laws. The administrator should know these laws because they will be communicating with executive professionals at all levels. The health administrator is unknown to Well Care Hospital, and the hospital the past six months has been underneath a governed by investigation for breach of medical submission. It is crucial that the chief administrator is apprehensive about the significance of his or her behavior in the health care surroundings; understanding the margins of ethics and medical behavior. It describes four elements necessary in order for a plaintiff, to demonstrate …show more content…
Duty to care is the initial element that handles the care that the respondent (i.e. doctor, nurse) liable to the patient. Whether or not it was an emergency, the doctor is duty-bound to treat the patient, but they are not compelled to treat every individual. If the doctors do treat them, he or she has a contract which is called doctor-patient relationship, and should provide a significant standard of care. This states that the doctor ought to give the same principle, care, and ability that an in the same manner that trained physician would give under the comparable conditions. The physician is foreseeable to perform the identical duties that a rational and judicious doctor would perform. If the physicians breach the standard of care, he or she could be accountable for negligence (Fremgen, 2009).
The breach of duty is next element one must show that breach of duty of care caused harm, and proof of damages as a result of the circumstances failure to comply to or the departure from a required obligation due to an individual (Pozgar, …show more content…
After court, Well Care Hospital was proven innocent of any medical compliance, because the patient did not return back to the medical facility for treatments, and medication was provided to take, but the individual did not return to back the hospital and declined to take the medication. The court rule Well Care Hospital not liable for the charge of the patient. The Governing Board and the CEO were elated about the outcome. Most of all, the medical administrator was pleased that this litigation was finally finish. The lesson learned is that employee had to be careful when handling patients and their family. The health administrator behaviors meetings with the employee tow a month. In the conference they conduct workshops and when over the policies and procedures handbook (Pozgar, 2012