hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeler
Considering the case was a school sponsored newspaper, I chose to support the majority opinion. I believe the school was under their constitutional right to get rid of those pages since the articles was obviously going to be a distraction to the students at the school. Also, the articles violated several peoples rights so it is better that they are removed. I favor a loose interpretation of this case. Although students have the right to express their opinions, it is necessary for restrictions in place. I believe that school was properly protecting its students’ rights and representing the interest of the majority. Yes, newspapers are a form of public expressions but it is a school environment and the faculty has every
Considering the case was a school sponsored newspaper, I chose to support the majority opinion. I believe the school was under their constitutional right to get rid of those pages since the articles was obviously going to be a distraction to the students at the school. Also, the articles violated several peoples rights so it is better that they are removed. I favor a loose interpretation of this case. Although students have the right to express their opinions, it is necessary for restrictions in place. I believe that school was properly protecting its students’ rights and representing the interest of the majority. Yes, newspapers are a form of public expressions but it is a school environment and the faculty has every