Hatohobei State Case Summary

1577 Words 7 Pages
For a small country setting like Palau, the independent of their Judiciary is always going to be a challenge. Using the case study of Hatohobei State with only 25 people living on it. It has its own constitution, a 9 member legislator, a Governor, a Lieutenant Governor, traditional leader, legislative clerk, a treasurer, an Island Projects Supervisor and two island maintenance officials.
Whether the Hatohobei state court would remain impartial when one family members or close relatives turn up for a court hearing would be a challenge given its strong sociocultural environment. Could this western model court system structure be still effective in this case? The introduction of their traditional peacemaking process might work better for them, and to the extent only major disputes may then refer to this modern court system.
Also, Palau has been regarded as one of the top premier diving destination with unspoiled beauty and rich marine environment . Similar to any small island country, it has its own legal system that determine to increase foreign investment while simultaneously preserving its cultural and economic heritage from over
…show more content…
The population of each of the other 14 states is less than 500 people, therefore, they have more chance to adopt an amendment against the will of the supermajority people. Anckar (2015) refer to this American method of a constitutional amendment as more federalism rather than representing democracy . But, the opposite could happen if they applied the supermajority of the people where Koror would be given considerable veto powers and no future constitutional amendment can be affected unless it has the support of Koror

Related Documents