Hate Speech Codes

Improved Essays
Freedom of speech, a basic right and amendment that most students who grow up in the United States come to learn and take pride in having from a young age. Many of us take this right for granted at times, what we do not realize is that there are so many places around the world that are continuously fighting for this innate right. Although we lack the fortitude at times, it is a vital right to all of us in our identities and abilities to grow as people and become who we are and allow ourselves to excel. The idea of speech codes, which can be commonly defined as: “politically correct" codes but are more commonly known as hate speech codes.” The issue of whether or not speech codes on campuses are justified is an immoral issue, which should in …show more content…
With that being said, this allows for students to have a safe way for college students to be able to examine the ideas of all other fellow students and be able to motivate informed decisions, become more educated and learn more about other opinions and ideals as a result. Speech codes blatantly limit the ability of society members, while not allowing them to express their ideas. But what many lack to regard in favor of not having speech codes implemented is that although speech codes may seem appealing, one of the major advantages of not implementing them is that: they actually create and foster debate, discussions that can be conducted in an academic context because students discuss their varying …show more content…
Lawrence III. He is a man who has notably spoken out against hate speech, especially in the United States. He retains the principle that if people are being restricted and not allowed to speak out, even if it is considered to be hate speech, then they are being too restricted, and thus impinging on their first amendment right of free speech. He firmly holds the idea that by allowing people to espouse their beliefs even if it were to be considered that of hate speech, that we are actually preventing the people from voicing their opinion. Thus, by doing so we are “silencing the minority” and by doing so are in turn excluding them from the exchange of ideas that free speech supposedly promotes in this country.” A major way that Lawrence seems to back up his argument is by mentioning a famous Supreme Court Case known as Brown v. Board of Education, he specifically notes this court case because he thinks that it represents one of the most important cases that has to deal with equal/fair protection. He then proceeds to assert the idea that everyone is entitled to be a giving member of society and that by having schools exist that allow separation based on race, or any type of segregation, which would purely undermine this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Richard Delgado is a professor at University of Alabama with expertise in the following civil rights, constitutional law, and critical race theory. He is an author with many journals articles and books written. Richard Delgado wrote an article called Hate Cannot Be Tolerated. In this article he speaks about the limits on offensive forms of speech and is they reasonable. On campus he has seen graffiti and fliers giving to Jewish and Black students at the law school telling them they don’t belong on campus.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Context Freedom of speech has been a foundation of the United States since its inclusion within the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. As a right that every citizen in the country is granted, US citizens are allowed to express themselves freely without major repercussion because they are protected by the Constitution. However, on March 9, 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that expression is divided into two categories: speech that has social value, or is “worthwhile speech,” and speech that has no social value known as “worthless speech” (Tedford & Herbeck, 2013, p. 189). Known as Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, this case established what was determined “fighting words, but also stated that language that is obscene and profane can be regarded as worthless speech.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate Speech Bans

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Need to Protect Hateful and Offensive Speech In today’s society, information travels almost as fast as light, thanks to the invention and development of internet technologies, however, this enables the dissemination of bad ideas, and hateful and offensive rhetoric across country lines faster than ever before. This ability to share ideas and find others with beliefs like yours has been blamed for the rise of the Islamic State, deepening political divides, and an overwhelming feeling of a growing collective feeling of helplessness. This growing uneasiness has led to an increase in hateful rhetoric online which many have called for the banning or curtailing of due to its incendiary and divisive nature.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Censorship Of Hate Speech

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I, personally, do not think that there should be any limitations in regards to freedom of speech as long as the content of the speech does not oppose any moral or civic values. According to ‘The Online Books Page, BANNED BOOKS ONLINE’ I’ve noticed that most of these books are banned for mainly what seems to be conservative reasons (Ie. “Margaret Sanger's husband was jailed for distributing her Family Limitation, which described and advocated various methods of contraception…”) and a popular method of social programming (Ie. The Bible and The Koran were both removed from numerous libraries and banned from import in the Soviet Union from 1926 to 1956…) both of which involve excluding what would be considered sensitive and/or potentially “misleading”…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article titled, “Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought,” Jonathan Rauch concludes that hate speech should not be censored on campus. Rauch believes that students have a right to academic freedom. He believes that students will not feel free to explore or question topics that may be taboo, if they are fearful of reprimand, limiting their ability to learn about the world during a crucial time in their education. First Rauch argues that gaining knowledge is painful and Knowledge cannot be separated from pain, even the most “scientific” criticism can be painful. For example, Physicist Ludwig Boltzmann committed suicide following criticism of his ideas.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legalized hate speech? Hate speech has been a problem in America with incidents such as the Charlottesville of the summer of 2017, Hate speech is the form of speech attacking a person or group based on their attributes such as ethnic background, sexual orientation, race, and etc. however, hate speech with without the intent to cause violence should be protected because if America were to try and censor another viewpoint and stop these people from expressing their opinions the past would have repeated itself once again with the attempted censorship of civil rights activists or the anti war protesters of the vietnam. Some would argue that allowing people to discuss their hateful viewpoints would cause themselves to dehumanizing minorities…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overtime In the United States, freedom of speech is a right inscribed in the laws which govern and protect the land. Meaning we, as citizens, are entitled to what would be considered a privilege in many other countries. It is this right, however, which has prompted the violence and divide seen in college campuses. Not the unification much anticipated.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    "Freedom of speech is like any machine, if you don 't take care of it, it can soon become worthless and antiquated." Freedom of Speech in the constitution of the United States has been since its inception a vast and complex subject. In spite of the schemes presented by the founders in the constitution, and Bill of Rights it was always considered that such freedom could be expressed in different ways, and that certainly would have an impact in the future. As a result , new disputes, specific acts of government , and the people; have fostered a controversy about freedom of expression.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [Preview] Effectively these campuses want people to act as they say, talk as they say, and be whomever they say. [Figures of Speech/Anaphora] Public universities are abandoning free speech in favor coddling. [Proposition] Exchange of ideas has taken a back seat to students wanting to be catered…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Waldron is prudent in suggesting that well-ordered societies “should not tolerate hate speech,” that does not guarantee that a society free of hate speech will remain a free society. Unlike what Tanya Cohen writes in ThoughtCatalog.com, the United States does not need to “get tough” on hate speech. Cohen, a self-proclaimed “human-rights activist,” claims that since “all other countries have laws against hate speech,” America needs to jump into the bandwagon and pass what she calls “human rights…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As discussed previously, universities have a stated goal. Keeping that in mind, it is the university administrator’s role to develop the package that provides the greatest probability of meeting the intended goal while staying within financial and logistic boundaries. If public universities had the funds and facilities to provide for each person who wishes to provide speech, there would be no need to favor speech. However, that is not the case. Every dollar spent to bring Milo Yiannopoulous to campus could have been spent on providing transportation to feature a Supreme Court Justice, Lawrence Lessig or Spencer Abraham.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument between free speech and safe speech is very extensive with both opinion and fact. However, there are two main arguments regarding the conflict one being that free speech is prohibited by safe speech and the other that safe speech aids in preventing physical altercations. Many universities are giving into the ladder, that safe speech is good speech, in order to preserve the peace. In doing so, students think that they can keep requesting for more and more restrictions on free speech. Others argue that this violates the first amendment, which includes hate or offensive speech (it's not illegal to be racist).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should there be restrictions on freedom of speech? In the year 2016, many voters have found themselves undecided and discontented between the two candidates, Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump. Some people have perceived some of Donald Trump’s remarks of being a racist and a sexist. Therefore, the people believe that Donald trump actions were out of line and should not be said; however, others disagree and encourage him.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Comfort Of Free Speech

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Discomfort of Free Speech A recent development in the struggle to define and protect free speech has taken place on college campuses across the country as millennials have requested “safe spaces” and “trigger warnings” in an effort to excuse themselves from conversations they do not want to have, conversations that encourage them to challenge and support their own views. As political correctness continues to be pushed, this generation of young people becomes increasingly leery of views that oppose political correctness, along with their own views. We will see a society that pushes only one outlook on every topic instead of many views on one topic as millennials become future leaders of this country. Although some believe that students are…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People's words are protected under law, and it is normal to not agree with some words heard, but it is not necessary to leave and hide because of opposing views. All around America, the debate of safe spaces at colleges have been controversial. As the argument is perceived from an ethical standpoint, it is realized that facts to support both sides are prevalent and strong. In our world, something is considered…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays