Harvard Calls: Usda's Food Plate

Harvard Calls USDA’s Food Plate inadequate Every new program has flaws. When the USDA’s Food Plate was introduce it had its critics. This new program was a revamp of the outdated Food Guide Pyramid. The Food Plate was viewed by many as a success for it was easy to view and fairly simple to understand. Harvard developed its own Plate and describes the differences between the two. The big difference being that the USDA version does not include valuable advice as to why the choices laid out were healthier. Harvard’s version starts by revealing the nutritional facts that whole grains are a better choice and why. Stated that that whole grains are much better for overall health and the react better in the body. It goes on to tell you that the refined …show more content…
Red meat and processed meats are an unhealthy choice. Harvard’s writers give better examples such as; fish, nuts, poultry or beans. Vegetables, in large, are not eaten in large quantities by some Americans (except for potatoes). The Harvard table explains the importance of a large variety or vegetables and less focus on potatoes which contain large amounts or starch. Starch effects blood sugar the same way in which sugar effects blood sugar. Healthy oils, which is NOT included on the USDA’s version, that include canola, or olive oil that have been proven to lower cholesterol and, in moderation, are good for the heart. Also not included in the USDA version is the addition of water. The body is made up of 60 percent water, it is vital to stay hydrated. The USDA model suggests dairy at every meal and does not recommend against sugary, high caloric drinks. Another interesting fact: The Harvard plan talks about staying active. Part of a healthy lifestyle must include activity as a balance to caloric intake. This is not mentioned at all in the MyPlate