Harry Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Nagasaki

Improved Essays
On August 6, 1945, American forces dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. Just three days later, on August 9, was Nagasaki’s turn. Instantly, the cities were left in ruins, and death took its toll. It is estimated that about 70.000 people died immediately in each city. What followed was destruction and increasing death rates due to the radiations. Although there may be many reasons for President Harry Truman’s decision to drop the nuclear bombs, the primary one must have been terminating the war avoiding additional U.S. losses. Japan was a part of the Axis, a military alliance with Germany and Italy created in September 1940. During 1941, America became more and more involved with the nations fighting the Axis. President Franklin D. …show more content…
at Pearl Harbor was the core reason for driving the President Harry Truman, successor of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, to make his final decision of using nuclear weapons to finally and permanently defeat it. Further charges, suggesting that there were other options for ending the war besides the bomb, and that Harry Truman knew it, have faced rebuttals claiming Japan was anything but on the verge of surrender. And within the historiography, consensus continues to elude scholars on such basic issues as why the United States used the bomb (Bonnett, 1997, pag …show more content…
Additionally, as Truman saw it, bombs were meant to be used. The use of the weapons was going to justify such expensive program. Certainly, the scientists who created it must have known the power of this new weapon. As a matter of fact, even President Truman considered it the most terrible thing ever created. However, Stimson projected that the costs of the invasion due to the terrain and the expected resistance were likely to be high (Bonnett, 1997, pag. 192). Truman, advised by Stimson, and after meeting with General MacArthur, was even more convinced that the use of the nuclear bomb was necessary. In fact, he stated, “Let there be no mistake about it, I ... never had any doubt that it should be used.” (Lacy, 2015, pag. 64). Evidently, if there had been so much research on uranium and plutonium in order to create an atomic reaction that transformed mass into energy, why not experimenting it on the hated Japan. In fact, the bomb had not yet been tested on such large scale, and this could really be a turning point for America in the eyes of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first atomic bomb to ever be used in warfare was used in 1945 on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events killed and injured many Japanese citizens and left their cities damaged and destroyed.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima, Japan in 1945 proved to be a controversial ending to the Second World War. There were several reasons why the bomb was dropped, but it still remains that the main reason given to the public was to end the war. However, the US used this opportunity to initiate a sense of power over the Soviet Union in order to discourage the spread of communism. President Harry Truman spoke of this bombing at the White House to inform the American public of his reasoning for this atomic bomb, and how it will be known for much more than “the size of the enterprise, it’s secrecy, [or] its cost.”. The immense amount of destruction and devastation seen by the innocent people of Hiroshima is unbearable to come to terms with.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beside President Truman motivations which was to end the war, he was still new to this idea of the atomic bombs. Stimson Secretary of War brief him on the topic and advised Truman to drop the bombs. Stimson reasoning for doing this was to first end the war with Japan and secondly to scare the USSR. Since Truman wanted to know more so that he make the right decision and with Stimson they help formed the Interim Committee. It included high ranking military officials and top scientist from the Manhattan Project as advisor like Oppenheimer, Fermi, Lawrence, and Arthur Compton.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a 21st century perspective there is a lot to consider when discussing the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. When choosing to bomb an entire nation to shambles to protect personal interests one has to look at all the accounts associated with it. While the united stated may try to rationalize the reasoning behind its actions, the bombing of Japan during World War II will never be justified. The moral obligations of the United States to the rest of the world are too high for the United States to use its powers for such evil. One of the proposed reasons for dropping the bomb was its effectiveness in ending the war.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the bomb dropping on Japan was commonly advocated as a military measure to force Japan to surrender unconditionally, the state of Japan before this event and the presence of the USSR leads to the belief of a calculated diplomatic measure stopping the USSR from influencing Japan. After the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese, the United States were forced to enter the war, starting to send troops to Japan to keep it in check while Germany was on the brink of defeat. After V-E day marking the victory in Europe, the US was still waging war in the Pacific Theater, and as the war continued, the option to end the war quicker arose with the newly developed atomic bombs. The decision to force Japan’s surrender in the war using the atomic…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    casualties of up to 1 million” according to the website of History. To prevent this for happening, President Truman decided over the moral opinions of Secretary of War Henry Stimson, General Dwight Eisenhower and some of the scientist of the Manhattan Project to use the atomic bomb. They were hoping to bring the war to an end. Above all, the Secretary of State James Byrnes a proponent of the Atomic Bomb believe that the bomb “would not only end the war, but also put the U.S. in a dominant position to determine the course of the postwar world” referring to the website of History. In other words he agreed that sending the bomb would help the United States in not only win against Japan also it would move the U.S. into a leading position in the postwar world.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite most American 's opposition towards the nuclear weapon, the government had used it anyways claiming that that Communism would spread unless the war came to a quick end. The Americans had been correct about the spreading of nuclear powers if the bomb was used, and the security of our world would be threatened in the future during the Arms Race, and the Cold War (Bradford). The Manhattan Project scientists had made a prediction about the future of nuclear weapons in a statement called The Preliminary Statement of the Association of Manhattan District Scientists. In the statement is is written that “we have been made strongly aware of the dangers inherent in the mishandling of this tremendous force by the peoples of this world. ...Scientists of other countries will be spurred on to develop atomic bombs of their own in self-defense.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US could have continued to fire bomb Japan with the risk of prolonging a war that was practically done, it could have demonstrated the power of the atomic bomb away from civilization with the risk that Japan would still not surrender or that the US would appear inept if the demonstration did not work. I believe Truman tried to follow the policies already established by Roosevelt to bring the conflict to end with unconditional surrender by the enemy and bring Americans back home. He was correct for his time, critics have all the time in the world to judge. I propose this, what if America did not use the bomb? Would America seem like a weak nation having power and not having the fortitude to use it or would Truman hide the technology as long as possible until it was needed.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman wanted also to deter the Soviet Union from invading Manchuria and occupying Japan (Campbell & Radchenko, 2008) It seems that bombing Hiroshima was for Japanese surrender and bombing Nagasaki was to deter Russian invasion. To Stalin it seemed like the start of an arms race in the atomic age and the first act of the Cold War. Stalin focused the scarce postwar resources of the Soviet Union in creating an atomic bomb to match the USA (Campbell & Radchenko,…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dropping these atomic bombs was an extremely difficult but necessary decision that America had to make. The Allies met in Potsdam, Germany to discuss the war at hand. The Japanese were still fighting strongly, and seemed unready to give up. The Allies decided to issue an ultimatum to the Japanese that required them to surrender,…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays