Harry L. Carrico Essay

Improved Essays
Harry L. Carrico (September 4, 1916- January 27, 2013)
Harry Lee Carrico was known for serving more than 50 years on the Supreme Court of Virginia (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Mr. Carrico followed his passion to relentlessly serve others by joining the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1961 (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Additionally, Mr. Carrico served 22 years as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia until he was mandatorily required to retire at the age of 86 on January 31, 2003 (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Notwithstanding his retirement, Mr. Carrico continued to sporadically hear cases as a Senior Justice and joined the faculty at the University Of Richmond School Of Law in 2004 as a visiting professor of law and civil engagement (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Although, Mr. Carrico was employed under many eminent titles (chief justice, senior justice and professor) he was essentially known for his admiration, civility and professionalism. Mr. Carrico respected everyone whom entered his court room but consequentially
…show more content…
Carrico was known for endorsing Virginia’s Miscegenation Statute in the landmark case of Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Wikipedia, 2016). The case of Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia involved Richard Loving (Caucasian male) and Mildred Loving (African American female) whom were sentenced to one year in prison. Subsequently, the Loving’s sentences were suspended on the condition that they leave the Commonwealth of Virginia and not return for 25 years together (Wikipedia, 2016). The Loving’s appealed their case and in 1967 the SCOTUS ruled that the anti-miscegenation laws were racist and had been legislated to perpetuate white supremacy (Wikipedia, 2016). In brief, the SCOTUS reliance that marriage is one of the many basic civil rights of man and a fundamental freedom which should not be deprived based on race or sex (Wikipedia, 2016). Judges whom are selected should not be biased nor infringe on the rights of mankind (Gustitis,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Theall, 60, main point of discussion at the forum was emphasizing her qualification to fill the remaining eight years of judge James “Jimmy” Genovese’s 10-year…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Questions from Problem One: Does Virginia have a militia? Yes, Virginia does have a militia. The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration’s official website details the establishment of a militia in Article 1 Section 13 of Virginia’s Bill of Rights, located within the Virginia Constitution: That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. More importantly, Liberty University Law Review’s Stephen P. Halbrook points out that in the year 1971, the people of Virginia revised their Constitution…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When he became an attorney he did not really think anything of prisoner’s rights. This started to change when prisoner’s petitions started to be filed in his court. The petitions were about how inmate civil rights were being violated. After the hearings of several inmates claiming that they were being mistreated, Judge Justice began to worry. At this point Judge Justice believed in the basic rights for prisoners.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Houston Gunman Dead After Opening Fire at a Strip Mall,” by Time’s journalist Juan A. Lozano, the writer informs the public on the background, analysis, and aftermath of an attack. The attack in question occurred on September 26, 2016, in Houston, Texas. In order for Lozano to inform his audience on this subject, he employs a variety of rhetoric throughout his article using logos, ethos and pathos. In the beginning of his article, Lozano uses much evidence of ethos and logos.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall’s Biography Being the first of fifteen children, John Marshall was already a natural leader. He was a soldier in the Revolutionary War, a successful lawyer, and secretary and most importantly Chief Justice of the United States of America. He was a well-respected man that played important roles throughout his life. A major influence in his teenage years was his father’s good friend, George Washington. John Marshall’s young inspirations, military background, and powerful government leadership led him to be an important figure in U.S. history.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Marshall’s tactics to unite the justices was to have all of the men live under the same roof. This way they would be forced to spend most of their time with each other and would get along better with one another. Marshall’s rulings in cases such as Talbot v. Seeman showed everyone Marshall’s potential power and ability to manipulate the system in order to reach the ruling he wants. Undoubtedly, John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. Madison case was his greatest display of his power and knowledge of the system throughout his time as Chief Justice.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving v. Virginia was a case in 1967 about invalidating laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The case was argued in April of 1967 and decided later in June. Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, lived in Caroline County, Virginia. Since there was a state law prohibiting interracial marriage in Virginia, they got married in Washington DC in 1958. This anti-miscegenation law was called “Racial Integrity Act of 1924”.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olive Mudie-Cooke Essay

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Olive Mudie-Cooke is the artist I have chosen for this research project. Olive Mudie-cooke was a women in the First world war mostly known as a British artist. She is to me an advocate for women everywhere. With aspiring love, courage and inspiration to us all. This women has done so much in her life to help others, as we can see through her watercolors and chalky drawings.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The voters should realize that the judge has to make impartial decisions and serve the whole society and not those affiliated to one party. Every citizen should get some information about the…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to evaluate the life and motivations of Pancho Villa in a few pages is like trying to corral a tornado. His legacy begun with him being a bandit. First he moved to Chihuahua,but swiftly returned after his sister was raped by a local hacienda owner. After tracking down the owner,Agustin Negrete,Villa shot him and stole a horse before fleeing to Sierra Madre mountains. Roaming the hills as a bandit,Villa’s outlook changed following a meeting with Abraham Gonzalez.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is it just to give unelected judges the ability to make moral and political decisions on behalf of a community, despite the fact that the community has no active role deciding whom these judges are? Jeremy Waldron is one of many adversaries of judicial review; subsequently he does not think that unelected judges should be permitted to make political or moral decisions on behalf of the community (Waluchow Constitutions as Living Trees 534). I disagree with Waldron and side with Wilfred Waluchow, who believes that in these circumstances, society as a whole is “well served by the judiciary” (Waluchow, Constitutions as Living Trees 566). I will begin by presenting two arguments against judicial review.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ben Pollizi Mrs. Kimmich English 10 Advanced 15 April 2017 Sacco and Vanzetti Shortly after World War 1, the United States was soon gripped with a massive fear of communists, foreigners, and anything that wasn’t American. This fear was taken out on anyone who was in America that wasn’t American. One key example of this was the lives of Sacco and Vanzetti. These two men moved to America before World War 1 had begun. Due to the fact that Sacco and Vanzetti were both Italian immigrants, and were convicted of their crime during a time of massive hatred toward foreigners, the justice system disregarded all the reasonable doubt in their case and declared them guilty.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays