The court held that the district court erred when it relied on whether a manager's con- duct seriously affected plaintiff worker's psychological well being or led her to suffer injury. The court held that while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. ß 2000e-2(a)(1) barred conduct that would seriously affect a reasonable person's psychological well being, the statute was not limited to such conduct. The court held that as long as the environment would reasonably be perceived and was perceived as hostile or abusive, there was no need for it also to be psychologi- cally injurious. The court found that psychological harm could be taken into account, but was not required by the statute. In Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., the Court
