In Katherine Elison’s “What’s Up Doc? A Bloody Outrage, That’s What,” talks about Katherine discovering her six year old watching “Happy Tree Friends.” The name “Happy Tree Friends” might sound like a show that means no harm to children although kids are being exposed to inappropriate and violent scenes. UCLA neuroscientist Macro Iacoboni argues that children often mimic what they see after seeing the same thing several times. Katherine goes on discussing her interview with the creators of the show “Happy Tree …show more content…
She felt that the media “Happy Tree Friends” should abide the First Amendment. It’s not the media’s fault that young children are watching violent scenes. Katherine blames the companies for putting ads on the show although it is not their fault. Katherine’s strongest point was interviewing the creators of “Happy Tree Friends.” She received evidence from one of the creators that the production “Happy Tree Friends” is not children friendly. It is not their fault that young children are watching this show. The show “Happy Tree Friends” is intended for mature people. Frank’s weak point is explaining how people remember quotes from a movie. Not everyone remembers just quotes. People tend to have lines, names, lyrics, and beats to a music or movie stuck in their heads too. Frank’s strong point in the essay is stating that people have no trouble in identifying advertisements slogans. Words like “Just do it” are catchy and