Based on our ability to think, happiness is a result of contemplation. He goes on to describe how one must possess the qualities of a happy person to be happy. Aristotle describes that we must develop and exercise the appropriate virtues if one must obtain happiness. It is the possession and exercise of virtue that is the core element of happiness. However, he believes that a virtuous person alone cannot contain happiness. Virtues are habits of the soul by which one acts well by expressing correct reason. This is acquired through practice and habitation. It is up to us to feel and act correctly. The answer to the question at the top is no. One can try, but happiness is not only based on virtue alone. (This is proven by the fact that a virtuous person cannot imply lead a happy life on the fact of being …show more content…
Through this experience, I was able to see many different personalities and characteristics about how people act and live their lives. I’ve noticed that different people act differently in positions of authority. Certainly a counselor for a six-year-old would not use the same methods as one for a sixteen-year-old. However, according to Aristotle, one should act virtuously even though I do believe there is no right way to act. If there is no right way to act, is there a wrong way to act? I believe this question can only be answered by the person themselves. The answer is based on morals and a belief of what is right and wrong. Aristotle believes that virtue chooses to find the mean and act in the middle. What Aristotle is trying to describe is that no two extremes are good. I believe what he is trying to say is that both are good and bad in their own right. By attempting to describe the middle, Aristotle is trying to find balance and take out what is good in