Most people drive in their everyday lives , with the increasing growth of technology it has become more dangerous. The hands-free law has not done anything to decrease deaths or injuries, it has only made people think it has. It will not change the number of accidents on the road caused by cellphones, and wont affect the distractions of the driver.
In the article "Hands Free Law wont solve the problem" it talks about the dangers of talking on a cellphone, but that the Hands-Free law will not prevent it. For example, it states "These laws are moving forward despite a persuasive and growing list of academic studies, involving both simulator testing and analysis of real-world crash data, showing hands-free phone calls are no less risky than holding a phone". Using a hand free device will not change the risk of experiencing a car crash. A hand-free cellular device does not take away the lack of attention on the road from a driver. In conclusion, the hands-free law does not change the number of accidents on the road caused by drivers using cellphones. …show more content…
For example it states "The simple fact is that it is really dangerous when you talk on your cell phone and drive at the same time. Hand-held cell phones are responsible for 1,000 accidents every month, and we have seen that there are very dangerous situations sometimes". This law makes it easier for drivers to make a call and not worry about having one hand on the wheel. Also by using this law it may make drivers not use there cellphones in the car, because they don't want to buy a phone headset. Although this is true, the hands-free device will be just as much of a distraction as the hand held device was, because of the role technology plays in our everyday lives the use of it is too powerful to
In the article "Hands Free Law wont solve the problem" it talks about the dangers of talking on a cellphone, but that the Hands-Free law will not prevent it. For example, it states "These laws are moving forward despite a persuasive and growing list of academic studies, involving both simulator testing and analysis of real-world crash data, showing hands-free phone calls are no less risky than holding a phone". Using a hand free device will not change the risk of experiencing a car crash. A hand-free cellular device does not take away the lack of attention on the road from a driver. In conclusion, the hands-free law does not change the number of accidents on the road caused by drivers using cellphones. …show more content…
For example it states "The simple fact is that it is really dangerous when you talk on your cell phone and drive at the same time. Hand-held cell phones are responsible for 1,000 accidents every month, and we have seen that there are very dangerous situations sometimes". This law makes it easier for drivers to make a call and not worry about having one hand on the wheel. Also by using this law it may make drivers not use there cellphones in the car, because they don't want to buy a phone headset. Although this is true, the hands-free device will be just as much of a distraction as the hand held device was, because of the role technology plays in our everyday lives the use of it is too powerful to