Han Vs. Rome, Attitudes Of Technology

Improved Essays
Jared Licht
Period 5
Han vs Rome, Attitudes of Technology
The Han and Romans were both huge forces in world history; technology and technological advances were both huge driving factors in the way their empires advanced. The Romans and Han had similar views on how important water technology was, and how it was vital to have a successful country, but the Romans certainly did not think the same way as the Han did about who the inventors should be, but they had similar opinions on how they glorified themselves as an empire. Water is a necessity and always has been, dating all the way back to the Han and Roman empire. Both the Romans and the Han knew that water technology is important to keeping a sustainable empire. Time after time, the most
…show more content…
Inventors are needed in a society so that the empire can stay up to date with the newest and most vital technological advances, and so the empire can stay rolling at full force. Both Rome and the Han had revolutionary technology from acupuncture to the greatest roads on earth, but they believed this technology should be discovered from two very different groups of people. The Han believed that technology should be created by high government officials, or those of the upper class. As mentioned in Document 4, the Governor of Nanyang, Tu Shih, invented the water powered blowing engine, which was widely adopted and used in modern history. While it is worth stating that this document comes from government-sponsored history, and may be bias, it still reveals that the Han showed pride in their technological inventions being discovered by upper class citizens. An additional document from peasant inventors would be helpful to show if they also had a role in discovering technology in Han. While the Han viewed technological discoveries as noble work, the Romans had an opposite approach according to the documents given. In Document 5, Cicero, an upper-class Roman political leader continuously states that craftsmen are paid for labor rather than skill, and that it is a job suited for a vulgar or unbecoming gentleman. This shows …show more content…
Both empires were very prideful of their technology and how it has shaped their empires to be as successful as they were. In Document 6, Plutarch, a Greek-born Roman high official describes in detail the grace and beauty in which their road system was placed across the country. He describes the great deal of technology put into the road system and shows how important this basic technology was in creating a roadway that was vital to their empires success. The Han had a similar idea, that showed how technological advances were at the heart of their empire. In Document 2, a Han government official describes how the creating of tools manufactured by small families were often well manufactured, but when mass production took place, the tools often became brittle and hard to work with. This shows that the Han government prided themselves in small production done within their country. Technology was at the heart of both empires, which was respectable because both empires where huge technological engineers. However, an additional document from the point of view of a peasant would be helpful, to show if the technology was really that big of a deal to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Athens was a Democratic Republic whereas Han China was Imperial. The most famous ruler of the Han Dynasty was Wudi. He helped the economy greatly by building roads and canals. He also built storage bins for grains. The Han government was Legalistic but had many Confucius advisors because the official belief system was Confucianism.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China Dbq

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han China encouraged the innovation of technology, they understood its need in order to better the lives of its people, they used it in a variety of ways and felt it was a positive step towards progress. Rome felt that innovation and new technology was not necessary and treated it as something to be used in limited situations they found it was on unneeded addition to their society and with little respect. Based on the first three documents Han China's officials recognized the usefulness of technology and the ways that it could assess its citizens the official saw the correlation between tool quality and the type of labor used to produce whatever tool iron tools and one case Rome based on documents four, five and six all seem to paint the Roman…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China Dbq Analysis

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ancient Greece’s civilization in 431 B.C.E compared to Han Chinas Empire in 100 C.E was not even one-fourth of the size. The distribution map shows many of Greece’s city-states as well as the water ways surrounding Greece such as: Aegean and Mediterranean Sea. The Han China distribution map shows an extremely developed empire ranging from the East China Sea to the top of India. In Han Chinas map features such as: The Silk Road and The Great Wall of China show just how advanced and unified the Chinese were. (Document…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and China, from about 200 BCE to 100 CE, developed technology. Though Rome and China both recognized technology as an essential part of their society, the Romans believed that technology was below the aristocratic elite, and the Hans did not. The first group of documents implies that technology comes from the benevolent government. The writers of these documents are most likely vying for a place in the government. The second group, two documents from Rome, suggest that technology is not worthy to be used by a true gentleman.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Han China abandonment and infanticide were accepted because of economical problems. This lead to the conclusion that even under stable political and economic conditions an infants life was not preserved. “A starving woman beside the road hugs her child, then lays it in the weeds, looks back at the sound of its wailing, wipes her tear and goes on alone” (Doc. O). Since at this time in China many people were in the lower classes one can assume that it was normal that woman had left her child to die because she would not have been able to raise it and keep it living for long. Similarly in Classical Athens the father could decide if his baby would be exposed in the public to die.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We can also assume that the Han had better control over their people and government, because unlike the Mauryans, China was very centralized. They had one capital and one ruler with absolute power. This makes it so China had very clear direction as it was only one person 's ideas being expressed through government. Mauryans also had a ruler, but he had assigned loyalties to govern smaller areas of India.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the time periods of the Han and Gupta dynasties, both dynasties made contributions to their country’s basic structure that previous dynasties had damaged. During the 400 year period of the Han dynasty, China’s basic political and intellectual structure had been well rounded out and during the time period of when the Guptas were in power, classical India carried out its greatest period of political stability and both economic and cultural life was able to advance. The political and economic institutions of Han China were primarily based on the expansion of bureaucracy within their centralized government and their development of extensive internal trade and merchants. Although Gupta India did share a similarity in their development of…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of both empires occurred for similar but contrasting reasons at different times; the Han dynasty…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China’s developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade. Both empires had many intellectual achievements but Han China had much more innovative achievements, as in improving things, while Gupta India was much more dynamic, meaning the Indians worked on theories and then proved them. Something the Gupta Empire and the Han Empire had in common was that the emperors of these empires both believed they were chosen from the gods to rule.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome both structure their societies very similarly through their military, social structure, and religions. And while these civilizations were great, when their empires fell, their falls were from the same source of problems. These civilizations also had differences through how they first started expanding, how the people they conquered assimilated, what their empire were influenced by, and what happened to China and Rome after their falls. A major similarity between China and Rome was their dependence on their military force, and how they were both extremely brutal.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays