Han China And Imperial Rome: A Comparative Analysis

Improved Essays
When comparing the methods of political control in Han China (206BCE-220CE) and Imperial Rome (31BCE-476CE), there were many similarities and differences. One way in which they were similar was that both governments were actively engaged in an economic activity which was designed to ensure a stable, working political and social order. One way in which they were different was the way in which they defined methods. One way in which they were similar was the way they went about creating a functional political and social order. Both the Hans and Romans used violence to maintain order within their civilizations. Imperial Rome and Han China left behind many achievements such as expansion, political structure, and social arrangements.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Han China Dbq

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han China encouraged the innovation of technology, they understood its need in order to better the lives of its people, they used it in a variety of ways and felt it was a positive step towards progress. Rome felt that innovation and new technology was not necessary and treated it as something to be used in limited situations they found it was on unneeded addition to their society and with little respect. Based on the first three documents Han China's officials recognized the usefulness of technology and the ways that it could assess its citizens the official saw the correlation between tool quality and the type of labor used to produce whatever tool iron tools and one case Rome based on documents four, five and six all seem to paint the Roman…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were two empires formed on different parts of Eurasia. Imperial Rome from 31 BCE to 476 CE included their citizens in their government by having consuls elected by patricians, who made up the senate, and assemblies dominated by plebeians. Patricians were the elite class while plebeians were the commoners. Although the citizens did participate in government Rome needed a more centralized form of government. Julius Caesar became the first dictator in Rome and centralized the military and politics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rome and China, from about 200 BCE to 100 CE, developed technology. Though Rome and China both recognized technology as an essential part of their society, the Romans believed that technology was below the aristocratic elite, and the Hans did not. The first group of documents implies that technology comes from the benevolent government. The writers of these documents are most likely vying for a place in the government. The second group, two documents from Rome, suggest that technology is not worthy to be used by a true gentleman.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion constantly developed and changed due to trade between the two civilizations of Rome and China. Religion and its ideology influenced both Rome and China in many similar, yet different ways. Religion influenced the emperors/kings actions and their empires customs. Religious ideology determined the social hierarchy that the civilizations had. However, religion differed when it comes down to what deity or people would be worshipped.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China’s attitude toward technology was more favourable than the Romans; they had a rather organized and class-divided society, making the populous’ general attitude toward technology to be lower. This can be proven through the constant concern on the part of the Han dynasty over the less than stellar opinion on the part of the Romans. As a foreword, every document provided was written by a higher class citizen or government official, giving no insight into how the common people, lower classes, peasants, or slaves felt about technology. This does not give a nation or empire-wide opinion on manufacturing and laboring, as the upper class was not the majority.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China was a dynasty that lasted from 206 B.C.E and lasted till 220 C.E. Their empire correlated with another empire whom were about five thousand miles away, in the Imperial Romans who lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires had an attribute that made them similar was that they were both imperial empires, affecting the government’s structure making them both centralized. Han China and Imperial Rome were different in a sense that they chose their kings differently. Of course in Chinese culture the mandate of heaven was usually an important factor however during the Han’s time the second king was selected by the first king’s wives who chose from many sons as she tried to take the empire over through her family. While the Imperial Romans went…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Dynastic cycle, the Han and Tang Dynasties of ancient China showed similar periods of prosperity because they both valued education. An example of this is that they had to take a exam to be an government official and it wasn't rigged so that the rich passed it every time. This supports my thinking because this made it so only people who knew what they were doing got a job in the government. Another example is that they prized learning over family background and those who studied got better jobs. This supports that they both valued education because the people who studied got better jobs than the people who didn't study even if they were rich.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are Romanization and Legalism comparable methods? In China and Rome multiple methods were used to control and unify an empire. Both empires ruled with ethnocentrism. Yes romanization and legalism are comparable, they both are similar methods because they relied on harsh laws and cruel punishments in order to control the vast controlled lands, busy, and populated cities. China and Rome both conquered many lands during the prime of the empire, and some of these lands were attracted to the culture of the nation and chose to adapt the culture and bind themselves to the empire.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will compare and contrast the military, government, and the daily life between Ancient Rome, and the Mongolian Empire. MILITARY The first part between this comparison of militaries will be the military of Rome. The Roman Legion was a military unit of 5,000 soldiers that was supported by cavalry.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    China and Rome also had domestic repercussion, but those repercussions were different. In China, they were brief and superficial, while in Rome, the transition from a republic to an empire lasted throughout the empires reign in Europe. Both empires were extremely invested in their public works for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays