Han China And Gupta Empire Essay

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China’s developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade. Both empires had many intellectual achievements but Han China had much more innovative achievements, as in improving things, while Gupta India was much more dynamic, meaning the Indians worked on theories and then proved them.
Something the Gupta Empire and the Han Empire had in common was that the emperors of these empires both believed they were chosen from the gods to rule. Han China had a very centralized bureaucracy which meant the emperor ruled over China, and this helped the rulers rule over a vast amount of land. The bureaucracy was capable of carrying out the duties of a complex state. In Gupta India, however, their government was regionalized meaning there were many local rulers ruling over certain regions. There was not much emphasis on politics in Gupta India so they did not
…show more content…
The Gupta Empire was more dynamic than the Han, meaning it was open and branched out much more. During the time of the Gupta Empire, they developed pieces of literature and Indian drama flourished. Their most notable intellectual achievements were the Indian numbering system, the concept of zero, and the decimal system. In the Han Empire, people were encouraged to not stray away from practicality. Chinese scientists were always improving their machinery and they invented a seismograph. The Han focused more on how things worked, which is why Chinese scholars would study the mathematics in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Athens was a Democratic Republic whereas Han China was Imperial. The most famous ruler of the Han Dynasty was Wudi. He helped the economy greatly by building roads and canals. He also built storage bins for grains. The Han government was Legalistic but had many Confucius advisors because the official belief system was Confucianism.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One difference would be how the Gupta had used spies. The government used spies to ensure everyone in the large region was not beginning to plan a rebellion and or an uprising, or in other words to keep civilians content with the government. The usage of legalism and confucianism in the Han China government was another difference between the two empires. As for Mauryan/Gupta India, their government was based on bureaucracy and regionalism. Another difference can conclude to the Gupta’s usage of the theater-state method.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both established a legislative government. They both had a leader who made the decisions and ran the country. They were both involved in trading. Trading is how they made their profit and received food and other…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China’s attitude toward technology was more favourable than the Romans; they had a rather organized and class-divided society, making the populous’ general attitude toward technology to be lower. This can be proven through the constant concern on the part of the Han dynasty over the less than stellar opinion on the part of the Romans. As a foreword, every document provided was written by a higher class citizen or government official, giving no insight into how the common people, lower classes, peasants, or slaves felt about technology. This does not give a nation or empire-wide opinion on manufacturing and laboring, as the upper class was not the majority.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both empires were very prideful of their technology and how it has shaped their empires to be as successful as they were. In Document 6, Plutarch, a Greek-born Roman high official describes in detail the grace and beauty in which their road system was placed across the country. He describes the great deal of technology put into the road system and shows how important this basic technology was in creating a roadway that was vital to their empires success. The Han had a similar idea, that showed how technological advances were at the heart of their empire. In Document 2, a Han government official describes how the creating of tools manufactured by small families were often well manufactured, but when mass production took place, the tools often became brittle and hard to work with.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ancient China and India are alike in many ways, but also very different. They did not have problems with one another despite their close distance. They both thrived off of one another and practiced their peaceful religions in the company of each other. Accepting each other's different qualities and kept their distance. Chinas main religions were Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Classical Athens they had a more self-governed government whereas for Han China the emperor controlled governed everything. In both empire infanticide was not seen bizarre in their societies. Also in both empires the women had roles that were very much alike and were viewed in a similar manner. These two empires had their differences but they weren't great differences that set them apart from each…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the ancient era in India and China, both civilizations had similarities and differences within the structure of their economy. They were similar in that women played an important role in the family as seen in both India and the Han Dynasty of China, however they differed in separation of economic class system. The citizens in both ancient India and the early dynasties of China were separated among a class system in which one's role in the civilization determined their rank in society. For example in India, priests held the highest rank below the government because priests were brahmins, meaning "one possessed by the supreme god", while in China the king and aristocrats held the higher ranks and the traders and merchants were the lowest…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing and Contrasting River Valley Civilizations Four of the major river valley civilizations are Sumer, Egypt, the Indus Valley, and China. All of these civilizations have revolutionary discoveries and inventions. They each have invented something or come up with a custom we still use today.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two prosperous empires that exceeded in developing trade, creating new inventions, and leaving a legacy behind collapsed. How could such a prosperous empire fall? The western Roman empire and the Han dynasty both collapsed during the classical era for similar and contrasting reasons. The fall of both empires occurred due to internal pressures like epidemic diseases, economic and social issues while external problems like invasions and nomads taking place at the same time. After both empires collapsed, the regions faced change in their culture like the spread of Buddhism and Christianity and adaptation to the previous empires customs.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays