Hammurabi DBQ

Improved Essays
Hammurabi was the king of a city-state called Babylon (in the kingdom of Babylonia) over 4,000 years ago. His reign lasted for 42 years. He was highly known for his code of 282 laws he created to protect his people and land. (BGE) However the question remains, Hammurabi's code: was it just? It was indeed just because of its family laws, property laws, and personal injury laws. The family law in Hammurabi’s code was just. It was just because it protects the people from unfairness. In law 168 it states “If a man is determined to disinherit his son and has declared before the judge, ‘I cut off my son,’ the judge shall inquire into the son’s past, and, if the son had not committed a grave misdemeanor…, the father shall not disinherit his son.” (Doc C). This is fair to the son because he has the right to …show more content…
In law 196 it says “If a man has knocked out the eye of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out.” (Doc E). This was a reasonable punishment during this time because if the punishment of the crime was to pay something to make up for the loss of the man’s eye, people with higher wealth could perform the crime multiple times and just pay their way out of a more severe punishment. To reduce the amount of violence in cities that were already unorderly, they made sure to have harsher punishments so that people would be less likely to commit these crimes. Another example of a just personal injury law would be law 215 which says “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on the body of a free man … and saves the man’s life, he shall receive 10 shekels of silver.” (Doc E). This is fair to both the surgeon and the community that he lives in. This is fair because the surgeon should be rewarded in the act of saving someone’s life so that it gives them another reason to continue saving lives of the people in their community. These laws were made with the good intentions of restoring order and keeping people safe from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi's Code DBQ

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Name: Andrew magadan Cohort: UCLA Question: Hammurabi’s Code: Was it just? (Title)Hammurabi’s laws fair or unfair Introduction Paragraph : Did you know Hammurabi’s codes were the first set of laws?Hammurabi was the king of a city named “babylonia? Hammurabi’s codes were a set of laws that everybody had to follow. Hammurabi’s codes were written down because was tired of people doing whatever they wanted.0 claim statement : Hammurabi’s codes is just for two reasons creation of laws and property laws.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi was a king and wrote a code which included 282 Laws which was not fair and ruled Mesopotamia 4,000 years ago. Hammurabi's Code was not just because it hurt the family, in negatively affected personal property, and was not fair against personal injury. To begin, Hammurabi's code hurt the family. For example, In Document C it says that if a woman who married and is caught adultery they shall bind them in the water.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi’s Code Hammurabi’s code was unjust due to the fear he put upon his people, his cruel punishments, and his social class divisions based on economy. In document A it provides graphics of Hammurabi’s stone of stele that contains “ shamash instructing Hammurabi in the law” to show how “the laws should be carried out”. In document C law 195 explains that if a father’s son “[strikes] his father” his consequence would be for “his hands to be cut off.” This is unjust because the son loses one of the most useful utensils. Therefore the father receives his patriarchy back, no matter the sons reasoning for the striking.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi DBQ

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The code of law is not just because of its family, property, and personal injury laws. Family law in Hammurabi’s code was not just. In law number 195 in states that if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off (Doc C). In law number 129 it says that if a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water (Doc C). Family law in Hammurabi’s code is not just.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi's Laws Dbq

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    That the strong might not injure the weak, in order to protect the widows and orphans, …”. As I stated that Hammurabi enforced his laws to protect the weak, the widows and the orphans. Hammurabi got his laws from “Shamash, the great god, and judge of heaven and earth”. Hammurabi just enforced those laws. He tried to make his kingdom fair and just.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi Code Dbq

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code was put in ruling in 1750B.C.E. He ruled in Ancient babylonia know now as Irack. His code of laws was a very harsh and unforgiving code of laws. It was the worst to women thought. Sometimes the punishment was worst than the crime itself. Hameribes cobe was a very unfair law.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi’s code, was it just? The famous code of laws created by Hammurabi were not just, because of the Family, Property, and Personal Injury laws he created. The Family Law section of Hammurabi’s Code is not just, and here is why.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (BGE) Was Hammurabi’s Code of Laws just? Hammurabi’s code was not fair because of its family laws, property laws, and personal injury laws. One examples injustice is the people who care about us most the family law. In law 195 it said if a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Hammurabi DBQ

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These laws were not just because, people may be putting their lives at death situation for screwing up or messing up. Especially Family, Property, and Personal Injury Laws. The Family Laws that Hammurabi made were unfair for many different reasons. Like the fact how he said that he was going to protect and help everyone (Doc A) but it ends up saying that if a child strikes his father, he gets his hands cut off.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hammurabi’s code of laws were seen differently thousands of years ago, opposed to how we see them today. Speaking in an 18th century BCE state of mind, I would say that the laws he established were just. I believe this because in the epilogue, Hammurabi says that as king it is his responsibility to protect his subjects and in my eyes, he does that by enforcing these laws, which makes them just. One of my reasons for believing that his laws were just can be found in Document C which pertains to the laws focused on family. Specifically, Law 168 in which it states that “If a man has determined to disinherit his son and has declared before the judge, ‘I cut off my son,’ the judge shall inquire into the son’s past, and, if the son has not committed a grave misdemeanor…, the father shall not disinherit his son.”…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi DBQ

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That might sound crazy today but that is their state of mind back then. Hammurabi just wanted to show a point that if you do it to someone else it will happen to you too. The same law implies for the slave, but instead of having the eye knocked out like the slave, he has to pay half of the slave’s value. Today that is very harsh that is back then about 3,000 years ago, they didn’t do the same to slaves as the free…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Hammurabi Dbq Essay

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4,000 years ago, King Hammurabi wrote a set of 282 laws to make his civilizations fair. But were they just? In my opinion, Hammurabi’s Code was fair because it protected family, it took care of people’s property, and it helped people with personal injury. First of all, Hammurabi’s Code protected the family. For example, in Document C, Law 195 says if a son struck his father, his hands shall be cut off.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were the first written laws.. The purpose of the code was to let his people live peacefully. Hammurabi’s Code is unjust for three reasons personal injury,creation of laws,and family laws. Examples of unjust laws can first be found in the area of personal injury. The first example is “If he has struck the slave-girl of a freeman and causes her to lose the fruit of her womb he shall pay 2 shekels of silver.”…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    And they were wrote on stone. He had many laws that had harsh discipline if you didn't follow the rules. He wrote the laws to keep the people in order. We will be discussing was Hammurabi’s code just? First you will have to know what “just” means.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, document E, law 199 it states that if a man has knocked out the eye of a slave he shall repay the slave owner half of his value. This is just because if you were the slaves owner and someone knocked out your slaves eye, you’d want some sort of compensation for the fact that you might have lost a able-bodied worker. Also, document E, law 196 it states that if a man has knocked out the eye of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out as well. This is just because it’s fair, it’s an eye for an eye. As you can see from the evidence that Hammurabi’s code is just because of the property laws.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays