Hamlet's Flaws

Improved Essays
In every person there is a flaw of some sort, due to the fact that no one is perfect. All humans have at least one flaw in their life that they struggle with. In the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, the young prince possesses a flaw of his own. He struggled with this flaw that led him to a tragedy in his life. How much struggled with procrastination, and that led him to many problems that he could have resolved much differently.
From the beginning of the play one way that Hamlet could have handled the situation more efficiently and helped saved his fate would be when he attempted to kill the king after showing his play. Throughout the entire story, Hamlet had intentions of eliminating the king but kept pushing it aside. Hamlet was procrastinating the murder of King Claudius. After hamlet receive the word of Claudius being the murderer of his father, he
…show more content…
Hamlet spent so much time doing so many other things that were irrelevant to the main mission he had. There were a few days where he taught the play, “You are welcome masters, welcome all”( 2.2.437).Then he announced the date of the upcoming play he was putting on “we’ll hear an play tomorrow,” (2.2.550).. In the movie, he also wasted time watching Ophelia his lover, and acting mad to put on a show. There were many different days he spent doing the wrong things. He should have been completing the task of eliminating the king. After all these events it is completely obvious why Hamlets biggest flaw was procrastination. He pushed so many chances aside, and too much time wasted acting mad. Hamlet's fate was caused by his own procrastination of killing the king which could have saved his own life, but due to Hamlet not doing things on time he ended in a tragic fate. Even though at the end justice was served, Hamlet still did not win, because he finally getting justice also cost his life to due to his

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the scenarios that call for quick, decisive behavior, Hamlet ruminates. Hamlet is prepared to “drink hot blood,” and yet he finds that he is unable to kill the unarmed Claudius because “now he is a praying.” The time has come for action, and yet Hamlet falters, though he has “cause and will and strength and means to do’t”. Although he justifies his delay, longing for Claudius to be condemned to eternal damnation, he continues to be a slave to his own paralyzing habit of “thinking too precisely on th’event.” If Hamlet had remained silent for once and focused on the task at hand, perhaps the play would have ended earlier, with Claudius killed “in the purging of his soul, when he is fit and season’d for his passage.”…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, some people might say that Hamlet takes long to avenge his father’s death because as George Detmold states, “ Perhaps the most significant reason why Hamlet hesitates , the critic concludes, is that although he is tempted by love, kingship, and even revenge, he is long past the point where he desires to do anything about them. None of these objects gives him a new incentive for living” (219). Detmold questions how come it took Hamlet approximately three months to take action, and then succeed in the very last minute whether it was unintentional or after he processed the thoughts through (219)? Well, the answer to this is just because he wasn’t curious in doing so and his mindset was someplace else, thinking about the consequences…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Hamlet, Hamlet thinks greatly over what to do about what he should do, he thought and planned, wanting to make sure that the justice he wished to bring was to be the correct judgement. He took great care to make sure he would not be duped by the phantom appearance of his father. Hamlet had to assure that his choice and actions were absolute, without mistake but with hesitation. The hesitation brought him to lose his opportunity to execute Claudius, to make it known to the people of Denmark that the villain was ended and that the town was safe. Both characters display the qualities of what makes a good king; to be smart and clever as a fox to trick their enemies and to be mighty and proud as a lion to fearlessly display their power and rule.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surveillance In Hamlet

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On his way to get revenge, Hamlet encounters several obstacles such as his social environment. In fact, the protagonist is in perpetual conflict with his uncle Claudius through the whole play. It will therefore lead to a distrustful relationship mainly between the two of them. Since the begining of the play, Claudius resents his nephew as we can observe by means of the pejorative adjective : "to preserve in obstinate condolement is a course of impious stubborness, 'tis unmanly grief, it shows a will most incorrect to heaven, a heart unfortified, a mind impatient, an understanding simple and unschooled" (act I sc2)…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Hamlet Crazy

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hamlet allowed his anger towards Claudius to get the best of him. But then again given the opportunity to kill him later he decides to wait for a better time. Desmond Graves says in his article, “In this speech, Hamlet contrasts thought with action, and argues that the native hue of resolution is’ sicklied o 'er with the pale cast of thought. And enterprises of great pith and moment with this regard their currents tum awry. And lose the name of action.’”…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Power Corrupts

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before the play has actually even started a main character has died, King Hamlet, through an imbalance of power. King Hamlet was killed off screen by his brother and successor Claudius, his death was characterized by the pouring of poison into his ear while he was asleep. King Hamlet was completely vulnerable to his assailant brother; his brother Claudius had a power advantage, and was a coward for killing King Hamlet while he was resting. This act of killing King Hamlet that Claudius commits literally sets the stage of the whole play, it is what drives Prince Hamlet to avenge his father in the first place, it gives him power. Also, this same act allowed Claudius to become the King of Denmark, effectively giving him an outrageous amount of power with few limitations.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People say that Hamlet would make a good king because of many of his qualities and his personality. They say he would make a good king because he values loyalty and is faithful to whomever he is close too. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern many not have been loyal or faithful, but they were honest. When Hamlet confronted them about going behind his back and helping the king, they never denied that they were. Hamlet could have easily told them if they did not stop they would end up just like Claudius is going too.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet waited a long time to get revenge on Claudius which caused many bad things to happen such as people dying unnecessarily and causing him to die. Hamlet calls himself a peasant, slave, coward, ass, and whore for not getting revenge faster and waiting a long time (Doc B). Hamlet also tells himself “My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth”(Doc B)! In Hamlets conversation with the ghost of his father he is told he is “Doomed for a certain term to walk the night, and for the day confined to fast in fires, Till the foul crimes done in my days of nature are burnt and purged away”(Doc A). Hamlets actions here are unjustified because he thinks worse of himself because he has not gotten revenge quickly.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet showed many signs of depression and used a lot of sarcasm in this play, due mostly to the fact that his father died at the hands of his uncle. “To be or not to be - that is the question: Whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles And, by opposing, end them.” (III.i.64-68) He struggled with thoughts of suicide and putting himself down, and in the end, it’s safe to say that these instances coupled with his loss of a sense of purpose led Hamlet to his eventual demise. Some could argue that, had his father never appeared that one fateful night, Hamlet and many others may not have died.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet, however, is more of a tragic hero; he has a tragic flaw. Throughout the play, it is this flaw that hinders his attempts towards killing King Claudius - his main goal. Hamlet’s ultimate flaw is his indecisiveness. As shown in his “To be or not to be” speech, he can’t decide whether or not he should kill himself. Later on, this indecision of his prevents him from killing Claudius.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The constant decisions Hamlet goes through shows that he is a cautious and hesitant person. Hamlet’s hardest decision is arguably the decision to kill Claudius. Revenge took control over Hamlet 's motives. Since revenge was Hamlet 's main priority, the decision to wait longer and not execute the plan shows a large amount of self control on his part. Hamlet comments, “To take him in the purging of his soul/ when he is fit and season 'd for his passage?...…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the play, Hamlet has been firmly set on his path to avenge his father’s death, but certain situations and events are making him rethink his plan and are making him reluctant. “To take him in the purging of his soul / When he is fit and seasoned for his passage? / No.” (III.iii.86-88). Hamlet could have killed Claudius, and exact his revenge right then and there, but decided against it.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although Hamlet may be a highly renowned individual, he is very impulsive. This causes him to make rash decisions due to his constant hunger for vengeance, which he regrets later on in the play. However, because…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of going in straight for the kill he opts to prolong his revenge. When the time comes for him get his revenge, Hamlet is making sure that he kills the right person. An example of this would be the play he puts together. During his second act monologue he says, “I’ll have these players/Play something like the murder of my father/Before mine uncle. I’ll observe his looks;/I’ll tent him to the quick.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In hindsight, getting revenge for his father’s death seemed imminent, justifiable, and achievable to Hamlet, but he never considered the interference of internal and external forces at play. He attempts to rationalize this cognitive dissonance (a state in which a person’s beliefs/values and actions contradict each other) as a way to relieve this internal conflict, wanting to kill Claudius but not actually going through with it when he’s given a perfect opportunity, by saying that he’ll wait until he’s in a more compromising and particularly sinful situation to kill him, which is preposterous in and of itself. Deep down, he knows this isn’t plausible, but regardless it works as a quick temporary solution for the problem and at that moment, it takes precedence over rationality. And once a person procrastinates, it becomes exponentially easier and seemingly convenient to fall into this cycle until eventually you’re forced to deal with the unavoidable repercussions at the end, for instance when Hamlet kills Claudius after Gertrude and Laertes die at the end of the…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays