Hamlet Fortinbras Compare And Contrast

Improved Essays
Every wonder how two princes can be so similar but so different in so many ways? How one can be so powerful and successful at what he do, while the other one is just fooling around? Hamlet and Fortinbras are two characters from Hamlet which William Shakespeare wrote over four centuries ago. Hamlet and Fortinbras both wanted revenge, both fathers died and both was soon to be Kings. Hamlet was going through more than Fortinbras was going through. Fortinbras was more of a man than Hamlet, and while Hamlet took his time to get his revenge, Fortinbras immediately took action for his revenge. Hamlet was the Prince of Denmark, son of the late King Hamlet and Queen Gertrude and nephew of the new King of Denmark, Claudius. Hamlet soon found out his …show more content…
Which caused Fortinbras to take immediate action for his revenge. He refused to let anything stand in his way of revenge. Fortinbras wanted to fight for his honor that he already had his 2,000 men ready, while Hamlet was going through the things that was happening.
Hamlet felt less of a man compared to Fortinbras: “how stand I, then, that have a father killed, a mother stained, excitements of my reason and my blood and let all sleep, while to my shame I see the imminent death of twenty thousands men” (IV, iv, 58-62). At that moment Hamlet realize that his revenge haven’t got him any where, but on the other hand Fortinbras revenge got him somewhere far. Hamlet realize nothing will stop Fortinbras when he was declaring parts of Poland that wasn't worth anything.
By the end of the book Fortinbras had his army ready to attack Denmark, and Hamlet was ready to match Laertes. Hamlet did not get to enjoy his revenge of killing his uncle because he was poisoned: “the potent poison quite o’ercrows my spirit” (V, ii, 360). Other than Fortinbras, he got to enjoy his revenge, he got his land back, he could finally be the King or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most movies and books in this day and age have simple plots with miniscule character development, but this is not the case in Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare uses foils that the viewer has to dig into in order to see what he is trying to convey, which increases the understanding of the play. The foils are created between three similar characters––Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet––that emphasize where they deviate from each other on specific traits. Even if one reads into all of the details they will still be thrown by the eventual, unpredictable, ending of the play. Shakespeare creates a new way to view masculinity by using both classical and modern interpretations of important character traits, defined by these foils, to show why Fortinbras is the only one left standing by the end of the play.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also like Hamlet, his kingdom is currently ruled by his uncle and he is, therefore, nephew to the king. Fortinbras goes to war for a piece of land that is worth nothing in order to maintain his father’s honor. The captain of the army states that “We go to gain a little patch of ground/ That hath in it no profit but the name” and admits that he would not “pay five ducats” for it and that it has no use for farming either (4.4.17-20). It is evident that Fortinbras’ father’s honor is just as important to him as King Hamlet’s honor is to Hamlet.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An heir to the Danish throne versus the heir to the Norwegian throne. Who is more suited to rule a country, conquer lands, and command subjects? We have Hamlet, a young man hell bent on avenging his father’s death and young Fortinbras, seemingly, chasing the same dream. One deems to stealthily eliminate his adversary while another marches forward unafraid. What distinguishes Fortinbras from Hamlet?…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, the plan fails due to the fact the Queen mistakenly takes from the poison filled cup. Both are wounded and ended up to the downfall of everyone involved. While Hamlet and Laertes set to be on the opposite direction, however, Fortinbras seems to be more in middle between Hamlet and Laertes. When Fortinbra's found out his father was killed by King Hamlet, he carefully planned his action and act according. He showed he was not reckless and didn't held back to seek vengeance on his father's death.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversity In Hamlet

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Hamlet encounters a Captain of the Norwegian army, he inquires about the reason for the great military presence in the area. The captain explains to him that Prince Fortinbras ordered the mobilisation of the military to attack and capture a useless area of land that once belonged to Norway. In the soliloquy that follows, Hamlet displays his jealousy towards Fortinbas’ decisiveness, pondering about how one could be willing to fight, and risk his men’s lives over a virtually worthless goal, when he himself hasn’t achieved anything despite having adequate reason and opportunity. Inspired, he then decides to remove all sense of moral ambiguity, and vows concentrate solely on enacting revenge on Claudius. The revelation that Hamlet experiences, displays his understanding that his largest source of adversity is his own morality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Character Foils In Hamlet

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hamlet’s indecisiveness is contrasted with the decisiveness of Laertes who proclaims he will do anything to avenge his father, even kill the murderer in a church. As a church is a religious building, this statement implies that Laertes wants his father’s murderer dead, and their fate after death is unimportant. In addition to Laertes being used as a foil to highlight Hamlet’s indecisiveness, Fortinbras is also employed as a foil character to display the same characteristic. Hamlet’s regret of taking so long to get revenge is shown when contrasts his inaction to Fortinbras campaign in Poland by…

    • 1374 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s overall message that revenge does have boundaries is shown through tragedies that Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are put through due to their drive for revenge. Each of these characters seek vengeance for the murder of their fathers and each show the different effect that impulse can have and how it is human nature to run after it. To begin, Hamlet, the young prince of Denmark who mourns the death of his loved father, is shown In the early scenes…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To determine the outcome, each son must be analyzed with respect to the intended outcome, emotional response, and course of action taken in order to measure the extent that the sons reach their goals, the amount that they suffered, and whether they achieved sweet revenge. This perfect revenge follows three conditions: to exact a sufficient punishment on a victim who is aware that they are being targeted by the avenger and avoid facing dire consequences. Although all reach revenge rooted from the fathers’ deaths, Fortinbras’ outcome is most worthy of his sacrifice by weighing the achieved aim with the minimal suffering, whereas Hamlet’s ending is the least worthy. Shakespeare introduces Fortinbras’ aim…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fate vs free will in Hamlet and Oedipus Outline Introduction: Fate can be defined as “a power that determines the event in the future. In the fate the events of man are already determined.” What is freewill? “The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one’s own discretion.”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A variety of characters make an appearance throughout Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet and all play a role in the overall work of the play. Three minor characters in particular are able to give further understanding on Hamlet’s character and the work as a whole: the gravediggers from Act IV, Yorick from Act IV, and Fortinbras prince of Norway. A minor character differs from major characters because they are more static, appear only briefly in the play with limited dialogue, and the decisions they make do not make a huge impact on the overall plot. The gravediggers and Yorick alike fit this bill perfectly, as they only appear in Act V, Scene 1. They do not grow as characters through more development or changing behavior from the beginning of their…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These parallels further show the destructiveness of revenge. Fortinbras and Hamlet are faced with very similar situations in which they feel the need to avenge their father’s death. Fortinbras however, unlike Hamlet is successful in his revenge because fate, or rather good luck, not the pursuit of revenge, gives him what he wants. In the end he is shown as the most likely heir to the Denmark throne and with this, he insists “I have some rights of memory in this kingdom, which now to claim my vantage doth invite me” (4.5.149-151). Proving that getting revenge is not the way to succeed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Revenge in Shakespeare’s Hamlet William Shakespeare 's, Hamlet, is one of the greatest tragedies ever written. Applying Aristotle 's view of a tragedy, Shakespeare creates an ideal tragic hero through his main character, Hamlet. According to Aristotle, a tragic hero must be of a high stature, possess a tragic flaw, and this flaw must ultimately lead to their own downfall. These characteristics of an Aristotelian tragic hero are all present within the protagonist, Hamlet. Hamlet is a prince, thus having a high position within society.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hamlet Madness Analysis

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Laertes and Hamlet are foils, because Hamlet is constantly changing his mind about avenging his father’s death and Laertes clearly does not care what happens to him in the afterlife as long as he gets revenge for his father’s death. “To cut his throat I’ th’ church” (IV,vii,231) Hamlet’s thinking is that if he kills he will not go to heaven and Laertes’ thinking is the complete opposite and does not care if he slits Hamlet’s throat in church. (I,I,13–14). Horatio is talking about the difference between Fortinbras and Hamlet. How different it was when his father (the king) was going up against Fortinbras and keeping everything under control and now Fortinbras is taking charge, rounding up troops ready for whatever.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hamlet appoints Fortinbras as his successor with his dying breath and says: But I do prophesy th’election lights On Fortinbras. He had my dying voice.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Prince Hamlet and Prince Fortinbras have uncles who have taken their deceased fathers rightful spot at King while the Princes plot a way to avenge their fathers. Fortinbras builds an army to take back the territories they lost while also attacking Denmark, making him a problem for Denmark. “...Now, sir, young Fortinbras, of unimproved mettle hot and full, hath in the skirts of Norway here and there sharked up a list of lawless resolutes, for food and diet, to some enterprise that hath a stomach in't; which is no other as it doth well appear unto our state but to recover of us, by strong hand and terms compulsatory, those foresaid lands so by his father lost; and this, I take it, is the main motive of our preparations...” (I.1.95) This particular quote helps us perceive how fast Fortinbras acts towards avenging his father.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays