Difference Between Hamlet And Fortinbras In Hamlet

Improved Essays
An individual’s character is not solely reflected by his or her own thoughts and actions, but also through the temperament of others who surround them. In the Shakespearean play Hamlet; William Shakespeare uses secondary characters, such as Fortinbras, Laertes and Claudius, to enhance certain traits of the protagonist, Hamlet, to demonstrate that all quests for revenge are “foul and [are the] most unnatural [form of] murder” (Shakespeare, 1.5.25). Fortinbras is a motivated, unequivocal Norwegian prince who wants to seek revenge on Denmark for the lost Norwegian territories and the death of his father as a result from a Danish – Norwegian war. Laertes is a motivated and determined son of the lord Polonius who desires to avenge his own father’s …show more content…
The characterizing difference between Hamlet and Fortinbras is his approach in dealing with the trauma as he redirects his anger from achieving self-gain alone; to achieving both self and national gain due to his character of leadership, ambition, and being unequivocal. Firstly, Fortinbras is a natural leader compared to Hamlet because he is able to unite a group of countrymen from the outskirts of Norway to conquer the lost territories of Norway. (Hamlet) This is observable by the effect on the national security of Denmark that this leadership of Fortinbras has when Marcellus …show more content…
This motivated Hamlet to find a means to return to Denmark and seek his revenge. Thirdly, Fortinbras is able to achieve more than just conquer territory unlike Hamlet who by chance had a second opportunity to finalize his revenge due to him being unequivocal. Fortinbras demonstrates this quality when he has accomplished his revenge by conquering Polack territory and being named King of Denmark. He would have not achieved his revenge if he did not chart out a clear plan that is understood by all and that does not manipulate anyone to suit his needs, but rather persuades them as he did with the countrymen of Norway. In contrast, Hamlet was not quite certain how he will achieve his revenge but knows that he has to seek revenge. This causes Hamlet to display an antic disposition to provide him more time to wait for an opportunity like the coincidental arrival of the actor group, Claudius praying, and when Laertes exposes Claudius in the duelling scene. This proves that because of Fortinbras unequivocal planning, he was able to achieve more than what he intended, unlike Hamlet who only achieved his revenge and not more since he died right after being successful. In brief, through Fortinbras

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The difference between the two characters is that Hamlet wasted time and did not act immediately, but Fortinbras took immediate action. Fortinbras could summon up the the passion and courage to fight for virtually no gain, simply to carry out his plan to avenge his father. Hamlet even swears that now he will finally do it and declares that “from this time forth,/[his] thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth” but incredibly, still succumbs to inaction (4.4.68-9). In the end, Fortinbras lives, and Hamlet dies, and we are left to modify the theme of action over inaction to conclude that immediate, righteous action surmounts both inaction and vengeful, poorly thought out action or…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The better question is, what makes Fortinbras a better kingly character than Hamlet? Fortinbras has three distinctively apparent characteristics which make him the better king candidate: motivation to lead, willingness to act, and honorable judgement. Fortinbras is the heir to the Norwegian throne whose father is killed by King Hamlet. As with Hamlet,…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Claudius uses his insecurity to persuade Laertes into “[cutting] [Hamlet’s] throat i’ th’ church,” both men under the impression that revenge is the best answer for the situation (4.7. 144). Laertes, misguided by Claudius’ selfish desire to benefit himself, blindly attacks Hamlet with no thought whatsoever besides the concentration for revenge. Laertes, using a sword dipped in poison, eventually kills Hamlet as revenge, but justice is served when Laertes is also harmed. Laertes realizes that Claudius is an immoral man, and he is troubled by the fact that he was willing to serve the corrupt king. Although he killed Hamlet as revenge for his father, Laertes is “justly kill'd with mine own treachery” (5.2. 337).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, the plan fails due to the fact the Queen mistakenly takes from the poison filled cup. Both are wounded and ended up to the downfall of everyone involved. While Hamlet and Laertes set to be on the opposite direction, however, Fortinbras seems to be more in middle between Hamlet and Laertes. When Fortinbra's found out his father was killed by King Hamlet, he carefully planned his action and act according. He showed he was not reckless and didn't held back to seek vengeance on his father's death.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adversity In Hamlet

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Hamlet encounters a Captain of the Norwegian army, he inquires about the reason for the great military presence in the area. The captain explains to him that Prince Fortinbras ordered the mobilisation of the military to attack and capture a useless area of land that once belonged to Norway. In the soliloquy that follows, Hamlet displays his jealousy towards Fortinbas’ decisiveness, pondering about how one could be willing to fight, and risk his men’s lives over a virtually worthless goal, when he himself hasn’t achieved anything despite having adequate reason and opportunity. Inspired, he then decides to remove all sense of moral ambiguity, and vows concentrate solely on enacting revenge on Claudius. The revelation that Hamlet experiences, displays his understanding that his largest source of adversity is his own morality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s overall message that revenge does have boundaries is shown through tragedies that Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are put through due to their drive for revenge. Each of these characters seek vengeance for the murder of their fathers and each show the different effect that impulse can have and how it is human nature to run after it. To begin, Hamlet, the young prince of Denmark who mourns the death of his loved father, is shown In the early scenes…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foil characters have both similarities and differences that are used to emphasize certain traits. More specifically, a foil’s life mirrors its counterpart but his/her differences reveal to the readers the subtle traits in the other character. In “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Demark”, Hamlet, the protagonist, and his old friend, Laertes, reunite in their home town after the death of King Hamlet. Laertes acts as a very useful foil for Hamlet in that the two men share life experiences yet they have different personalities and behaviors.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To determine the outcome, each son must be analyzed with respect to the intended outcome, emotional response, and course of action taken in order to measure the extent that the sons reach their goals, the amount that they suffered, and whether they achieved sweet revenge. This perfect revenge follows three conditions: to exact a sufficient punishment on a victim who is aware that they are being targeted by the avenger and avoid facing dire consequences. Although all reach revenge rooted from the fathers’ deaths, Fortinbras’ outcome is most worthy of his sacrifice by weighing the achieved aim with the minimal suffering, whereas Hamlet’s ending is the least worthy. Shakespeare introduces Fortinbras’ aim…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamlet Anti Hero Analysis

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hamlet is portrayed as a gritty anti-hero with human flaws and qualities such as arrogance, apathy and paranoia, which are revealed in his hamartia and peripeteia. Hamlet’s selfishness fuels his revenge against Claudius but he follows through intelligently, but arrogantly as he refuses to consider the welfare of others. Hamlet’s revenge triggered a series of remorseless murders in the name of his father. The constant surveillance on Hamlet instigated his constant paranoia of being watched and plotted against because his trust was always betrayed. Gertrude’s hasty marriage and Duncan’s surreptitious murder infuriates Hamlet’s enough to feel obligated to avenge his father’s death mercilessly while demonstrating anti-heroic qualities of hamartia…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A variety of characters make an appearance throughout Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet and all play a role in the overall work of the play. Three minor characters in particular are able to give further understanding on Hamlet’s character and the work as a whole: the gravediggers from Act IV, Yorick from Act IV, and Fortinbras prince of Norway. A minor character differs from major characters because they are more static, appear only briefly in the play with limited dialogue, and the decisions they make do not make a huge impact on the overall plot. The gravediggers and Yorick alike fit this bill perfectly, as they only appear in Act V, Scene 1. They do not grow as characters through more development or changing behavior from the beginning of their…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These parallels further show the destructiveness of revenge. Fortinbras and Hamlet are faced with very similar situations in which they feel the need to avenge their father’s death. Fortinbras however, unlike Hamlet is successful in his revenge because fate, or rather good luck, not the pursuit of revenge, gives him what he wants. In the end he is shown as the most likely heir to the Denmark throne and with this, he insists “I have some rights of memory in this kingdom, which now to claim my vantage doth invite me” (4.5.149-151). Proving that getting revenge is not the way to succeed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Revenge in Shakespeare’s Hamlet William Shakespeare 's, Hamlet, is one of the greatest tragedies ever written. Applying Aristotle 's view of a tragedy, Shakespeare creates an ideal tragic hero through his main character, Hamlet. According to Aristotle, a tragic hero must be of a high stature, possess a tragic flaw, and this flaw must ultimately lead to their own downfall. These characteristics of an Aristotelian tragic hero are all present within the protagonist, Hamlet. Hamlet is a prince, thus having a high position within society.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hamlet Madness Analysis

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Laertes and Hamlet are foils, because Hamlet is constantly changing his mind about avenging his father’s death and Laertes clearly does not care what happens to him in the afterlife as long as he gets revenge for his father’s death. “To cut his throat I’ th’ church” (IV,vii,231) Hamlet’s thinking is that if he kills he will not go to heaven and Laertes’ thinking is the complete opposite and does not care if he slits Hamlet’s throat in church. (I,I,13–14). Horatio is talking about the difference between Fortinbras and Hamlet. How different it was when his father (the king) was going up against Fortinbras and keeping everything under control and now Fortinbras is taking charge, rounding up troops ready for whatever.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Hamlet’s method was moving at a slower pace, Laertes’ was the opposite. Unlike Hamlet, Laertes acted almost right away and sailed back to France ready to overthrow Claudius. Laertes even brought followers that were chanting, “Choose we, Laertes shall be king!”(IV. v. 116) This displays how…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Prince Hamlet and Prince Fortinbras have uncles who have taken their deceased fathers rightful spot at King while the Princes plot a way to avenge their fathers. Fortinbras builds an army to take back the territories they lost while also attacking Denmark, making him a problem for Denmark. “...Now, sir, young Fortinbras, of unimproved mettle hot and full, hath in the skirts of Norway here and there sharked up a list of lawless resolutes, for food and diet, to some enterprise that hath a stomach in't; which is no other as it doth well appear unto our state but to recover of us, by strong hand and terms compulsatory, those foresaid lands so by his father lost; and this, I take it, is the main motive of our preparations...” (I.1.95) This particular quote helps us perceive how fast Fortinbras acts towards avenging his father.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics