Essay on Hamilton County Judges

1519 Words Nov 9th, 2011 7 Pages
Hamilton County Judges
Effectiveness Study

Prepared by Team 32 Prepared for Dr. Norman Lewis BA 2300 Statistics 1

This study is designed to provide the efficiency status of 38 Hamilton County Judges. The study looked at the number of cases disposed, appealed and reversed. The information gathered is from data for the Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court and Municipal Court. Two of the judges, Patrick Dinkelacker and Timothy Hogan served in two different courts during the three year study period. This report will show the efficiency of all 38 judges as a whole and as individuals.

There were 182,908 total cases disposed during the study with 2,368 were appealed and 320 decisions being reversed. Based on the data provided
…show more content…
West

Probability 0.002 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.003 0.005 0.006 0.004 0.001

% Probability 0.21% 0.53% 0.46% 0.41% 0.44% 0.56% 0.31% 0.53% 0.61% 0.41% 0.14%

Municipal Court 500

Domestic Court 106 Common Court 1,762

Number of Cases Appealed by Court

The probability of reversal by judge for each court is as follows: A. Common Pleas Court Judge Fred Cartolano Thomas Crush Patrick Dinkelacker Probability 0.003951 0.002966 0.006359 % Probability 0.40% 0.30% 0.64%

Timothy Hogan Robert Kraft William Mathews William Morrissey Norbert Nadel Arthur Ney Jr. Richard Niehaus Thomas Nurre John O'Connor Robert Ruehlman J. Howard Sundermann Jr. Ann Marie Tracey Ralph Winkler

0.003582 0.002231 0.007951 0.007256 0.006759 0.004349 0.004772 0.002000 0.004042 0.005616 0.010471 0.004139 0.001942

0.36% 0.22% 0.80% 0.73% 0.68% 0.43% 0.48% 0.20% 0.40% 0.56% 1.05% 0.41% 0.19%

B.

Domestic Relations Court Judge Penelope Cunningham Patrick

Related Documents