Habeas Corpus Liberties

Great Essays
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
Habeas corpus is a way of determining whether those that are jailed have been jailed through the legal processes and if the reason behind the jailing is legal. This paper will discuss how the administration led by Bush kept prisoners at GITMO during the war on terror. The civil rights of the prisoners were never considered since the place where they were kept was beyond the reach of the constitution of the United States of America. It was the duty of the Supreme Court to protect the rights of the prisoners by the use of Habeas Corpus and given orders of the shutting down of GITMO facility.
Habeas Corpus in English Traditions
The effect of Habeas Corpus was first felt when the law of Anglo-Saxon
…show more content…
This was in the year 1801 when the then president of the United States mentioned it in his speech. The president said that the people of the United States of America would be protected by Habeas Corpus so that they could continue enjoying their freedom. It was then put in the constitution of the country where it is still being used in the present day in the United States of America. Habeas Corpus has adapted the same tradition as that of the England whereby it ensures that people are imprisoned legally and for a legal reason (Gregory, …show more content…
The generals wanted military courts to be set up so that he could rein over his opponents politically. Abraham Lincoln allowed for the imprisonment of military people, prisoners captured during war and those that were suspected to be spies. Anyone suspected to be a traitor was also held for the whole period of war without being put into trials hence not considering their civil liberty.
Habeas Corpus had also been suspended by the president of the confederation, Jefferson Davis. The suspending happened in the Confederate States of America. Jefferson wanted to maintain order in the confederacy and facilitate the industrialization of the South. The suspension of Habeas Corpus by Jefferson was to ensure that the losses it had inflicted are compensated. The congress also met and passed a bill asking for the suspension of Habeas Corpus using its authority. Lincoln exercised his power through the authority of the congress and suspends Habeas corpus once more (Federman, 2012).
Relevance of Habeas Corpus to the United States

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    -Suspension of Civil Liberties during the Civil War Southerners: John…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) -Should the government be able to indefinitely hold a U.S. citizen accused of being an "illegal enemy combatant" and deny them their due process rights? The Situation (Adam) State the facts of the case. What happened? -…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Were Lincoln’s actions justified? During Lincoln's presidency, he was criticized for taking "extra-constitutional measures” but I think Lincoln’s actions were a reflection of his beliefs in a president’s responsibility to protect. To protect not only from foreign threats, but from domestic ones as well.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conflict began when Washington, D.C, the nation's capital, became weak and powerless to the Confederate states after Virginia had seceded from the Union. Maryland played a key role in the Civil War because it was a slave state that was on the brink of joining the Confederacy. Washington needed Maryland to stay with the Union to maintain balance and provide safety in the war effort. On April 27, 1861, President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, without approval from Congress, in order to suppress the the sympathizers and rebels that were in the area of Philadelphia to Washington, D.C. This action led to a compromise of a basic civil liberty protected by the United States Constitution.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Real Lincoln by Thomas DiLorenzo he writes that Lincoln was a dictator who flagrantly violated constitutional freedoms, and violated civil liberties. Lincoln justified his actions by claiming their necessity because of the war, and permitted because of war powers. What those powers were was never clearly defined except in putting down a rebellion. His real motive was to centralize power under his tyrannical government. Lincoln's violations of civil liberties included the suspending habeas corpus, instituting martial law, using military tribunals for civilian trials, suppressing free elections, interfering with state legislatures, engaging in a war without the consent of congress, blockading southern ports, censoring telegraphs and newspapers, and authorizing a mass execution of natives in a Sioux uprising in Minnesota.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the nation has evolved, the interpretation of the Constitution has varied. While the Sixth Amendment has been largely upheld in most domestic cases, in fact it has routinely been denied to those who are entitled to its protection when the government deems the situation as a threat to national security. Similarly, the understanding of the Eighth Amendment has been strictly interpreted in matters of domestic law, but the meaning is deviated from in cases where national security has taken the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article of my interest concerns the unconstitutional nature of the Executive Order that President Trump enacted in January. Earlier this semester, we discussed how the travel ban issued by Executive Order violates aspects of the constitutional law. The article by Kerry Abrams, professor of law at the University of Virginia School of Law, succinctly explains how the Executive order violates constitutional law. Firstly, the order violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment by restricting individuals from seven predominantly Muslim countries for their religion and nationality.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This was necessary at the time since not all states were very supportive of the north. Maryland was a good example there southern support who would act against the union army in various ways. One of this way was to blow up one railroad lines that were giving support to the northern troops. This later be put into effect across all the northern states. Congress allows Lincoln order to become a bill and it was challenged by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney saying only congress could suspend the writ which they did.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln, was an incredible president in terms of what he accomplished in bettering our nation, however, he was not justified in his expansion of the executive branch. This caused many unjust occurrences both to the government, and the people. In doing this, he opened the door for other presidents, giving them justification in their actions, caused the unlawful treatment of many citizens, and allowed for deaths of citizens. One of the main issues with Lincoln expanding presidential power, is that he gave other presidents, justification for similar acts in their mind. Whether it be Woodrow Wilson during World War I or President Roosevelt in World War II, they both felt that because Lincoln banned the Habeas Corpus they had ample reasoning…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Magna Carta was an influential, historical document that impacted society in several ways. It was signed by the British King John. The King signed it, unaware of all rights he was giving up. The Magna Carta was basically 63 grievances of the noblemen in Britain. The Magna Carta was just as impactful now as it was then.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederate Sympathies

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lincoln desperately needed to protect the important state from Confederate interference. He decided to do so by suspending the writ of habeas corpus between Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., for the same reasons he would later do it elsewhere; any resistance in the situation could severely damage the Union cause, and…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was in the early stages of the conflict between the North and the South, when the Union had not yet declared war on the Confederates. Even though the President of the United States isn’t allowed to declare war, this command definitely had many warlike characteristics that brought the extent to which he was using his power into question. He also played the main role in assembling an army of many men-another act to which Congress is entitled. Lincoln’s decision was controversial because it was to suspend the writing of the Habeas Corpus, which allows an individual to…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles II Habeas Corpus

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Habeas corpus is Latin meaning “to have the body.” This 1679 law gave every prisoner the right to obtain a writ or document ordering that the prisoner be brought before a judge to specify the charges against the prisoner. The judge would decide whether the prisoner should be tried or set free. Because of the Habeas Corpus Act, a monarch could not put someone in jail simply for opposing the ruler. Also, prisoners…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prisoners Rights Essay

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Prisoner rights are rights given to prisoners while serving time in prison. There are many different rights discussed in this essay about rights such as work, education and personal property. Prisoners’ rights are a civil liberty because it complies with the laws of the constitution. Throughout the extensive period of time in which prisoner’s fought for their rights, many historical events and periods such as the hands-off period, the civil rights period, court cases such as Procunier vs Martinez and influential people such as Malcolm x all changed the countries attitude tremendously which ultimately led to prisoners receiving rights.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    National security and the protection of a state’s citizens is a primary duty for a government. The protection of human rights is also a great responsibility and central to having a modern democracy. A government though must sometimes restrict the human rights of some of its citizens in order to protect the state and its people. The judiciary has a role in deciding when to intervene in the restriction of the human rights of the citizenry when it feels the government has gone too far. In this essay I would argue that the judiciary should not use defence on matters of national security restricting the citizenry’s human rights and should fulfil its role as an independent check on the government in charge of safeguarding human rights.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays