Richard Alba and Steven Messner study the concern of guns, crime, and gun control in Gary Kleck’s book “Point Blank”. They publicize the flaws in Kleck’s analysis and linkages within his evidence and inferences. They concur with Kleck on the gun control debate that it needs grounding in the evidence and set out to examine the foundations for some of the contentious conclusions by Gary Kleck and others. The examples they use demonstrate disagreements of authors' opinion on the control of guns. Their point is the key issue of the balance of guns and crime. Kleck acknowledges the position that guns have as a component contributing to crime rates, but he counterpoises the bad side and good side of guns to summon attention to the use of guns by
…show more content…
The examples indicate that ownership of a gun has become more concentrated, with 48% of people reporting that they had five or more guns. They argue that the United States has few limits on ownership of the firearm. A number of states with the right to carry laws has raised. A study in 2015 found that the right to carry law may increase gun violence more than decrease it. In 2011, a survey revealed that there were nearly 37,000 attempts made to get a weapon illegally, even with the limited regulations in the United States. Research and anecdotal evidence indicate that there are a significant number of firearms that have been smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border. Devon Maylie and Leighton Kille studies have shown that the exact number of firearms imported to the Mexico border is hard to quantify. Garen Wintemute explains the risk of having exposure to guns in the household. He uses an example of schoolmates who have been invited to a party on Halloween that stop at someone elses house by mistake. On the day of Halloween, Mr. Rodney and Mrs. Bonnie Peairs were in their house and two boys had stopped …show more content…
He argues that if the Second Amendment allows the ownership of guns for personal reasons, the statutes will remain valid as reasonable restrictions of those rights. Garen Wintemute gives the reader implications that the Second Amendment promises people that they can only have the right to bear arms in service of a well-regulated state militia. Jens Ludwig and his colleague Philip J. Cook studied on whether the Brady Act was associated with a decrease in rates of homicide and suicide. They use examples of data for adults because they are the primary target population, and they classified 32 states that enact background checks for a 5-day waiting period. The examples indicate that the Brady Act could be a decrease in the rates of violence that guns have. They argue that they have no evidence in their analysis to prove the Brady Act was related to the reduction in rates of homicide, but by decreasing the flow of guns from treatment states into the secondary gun markets could have negative affiliations with the homicide rates. Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook studies show the audience that the Brady Act has been associated with decreases in firearm suicide rates, but not within overall suicide and homicide
The examples indicate that ownership of a gun has become more concentrated, with 48% of people reporting that they had five or more guns. They argue that the United States has few limits on ownership of the firearm. A number of states with the right to carry laws has raised. A study in 2015 found that the right to carry law may increase gun violence more than decrease it. In 2011, a survey revealed that there were nearly 37,000 attempts made to get a weapon illegally, even with the limited regulations in the United States. Research and anecdotal evidence indicate that there are a significant number of firearms that have been smuggled across the U.S.-Mexico border. Devon Maylie and Leighton Kille studies have shown that the exact number of firearms imported to the Mexico border is hard to quantify. Garen Wintemute explains the risk of having exposure to guns in the household. He uses an example of schoolmates who have been invited to a party on Halloween that stop at someone elses house by mistake. On the day of Halloween, Mr. Rodney and Mrs. Bonnie Peairs were in their house and two boys had stopped …show more content…
He argues that if the Second Amendment allows the ownership of guns for personal reasons, the statutes will remain valid as reasonable restrictions of those rights. Garen Wintemute gives the reader implications that the Second Amendment promises people that they can only have the right to bear arms in service of a well-regulated state militia. Jens Ludwig and his colleague Philip J. Cook studied on whether the Brady Act was associated with a decrease in rates of homicide and suicide. They use examples of data for adults because they are the primary target population, and they classified 32 states that enact background checks for a 5-day waiting period. The examples indicate that the Brady Act could be a decrease in the rates of violence that guns have. They argue that they have no evidence in their analysis to prove the Brady Act was related to the reduction in rates of homicide, but by decreasing the flow of guns from treatment states into the secondary gun markets could have negative affiliations with the homicide rates. Jens Ludwig and Philip J. Cook studies show the audience that the Brady Act has been associated with decreases in firearm suicide rates, but not within overall suicide and homicide