Gun Ownership: The Case Of District Of Columbia V. Heller

Improved Essays
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” It is prudent true to state that the issue of gun ownership is an old tradition of United States than the nation itself, which is fully protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Therefore, it would be a clear infringement to the constitution if we shall have more gun control law in place. In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, June 26, 2008, Justice Antonn Scalia opined that the Second Amendment protects and safeguards fully a person right to own and posses a firearm regardless whether he or she is connected with rendering service in a militia. However, that person is only allowed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grassley Cruz Legislation The Grassley Cruz Legislation is a bill that aims to achieve a variety of gun control issues in order to allow for greater safety from guns. The attempt to better gun safety is to first increase resources and tools for prosecuting criminals of these crimes. It is able to achieve this be criminalizing straw purchases of weapons along with adding additional penalties and qualifications for trafficking guns. The bill also aims to increase school safety.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant in the case that was with Heller, whose last name is Stevens, stated his opinion on the matter. Stevens stated that, “The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to the concern that the power of congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to state sovereignty (Lawnix, par. 15).” Neither in the manuscript of the Second Amendment or in the quarrels in the advocate’s evidence, was there even the least interest of the Framers in limiting of the legislature’s power of controlling the uses of firearms used by the private citizen. Stevens also said, “There is no indication that the Framers intended…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in the Constitution. There have been several cases where the Amendment has been challenged. As the world keeps growing and developing, the amendments have stayed the same since the creation in 1789. Therefore, as the years go by the original meaning of the text is getting lost in translation, which has caused the Supreme Court Justices to try to interpret the meaning the best way they can to ensure a fair trial.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The interpretation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America has been a topic of controversy, ever since its acceptance over two-hundred years ago. One of the main issues with the amendment is, since its acceptance in 1791, many of the issues are now considered irrelevant and insignificant to our society today. One of the most well known Supreme Court cases is the infamous District of Columbia v. Heller case. It was the very first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. The District of Columbia v. Heller, plays a crucial and decisive role in our constitutional rights to bear arms for self defence.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saul Cornell’s book titled “A Well Regulated Militia” explains the right of a citizen to bear arm. An important law made for the protection of rights for citizens of the United State is the second Amendment. The second amendment allowed people to maintain the security of their families, and properties. Citizens can also arm themselves in other to be part of a militia which is well regulated.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2011, there were over 11,000 gun homicide victims. Guns are used in crime because they are easy to obtain and only one of the two different ways to acquire a gun is actually regulated (Braga).With all of the recent shootings and crimes going on, why does the United States do something to fix the issue? Massachusetts is one of the states trying to require both primary and secondary transactions to be recorded. Secondary transactions are guns resold to any from another buyer, which makes up about 30-40% of transactions (Braga). This means almost one of every three transactions are from one consumer to another.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Vernick and Teret). These are the core of what America was founded upon. Furthermore, the Kansas constitution dictates that the state militia is composed of "All able bodied citizens between the ages of 21 and 45 years" (Vernick and Teret). The second amendment is one of the defining features of the U.S. Constitution and the bill of rights therein, and given that "83% of Americans will be the victim of a violent crime in the course of their lives" (Koppel), everyone living in this most wonderful of countries has a constitutional duty to own firearms.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratified in December 1791, the second amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. The second amendment gives every citizen the right to own a gun free of federal regulations, to protect themselves in the face of danger. In the article The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms” by Chad Brooks, James Madison proposed “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The amendment militia clause was never meant to restrict each citizen’s rights to bear arms. This amendment is based on our god given right, as well as the founders believed that the greatest protection we have to ensure our liberty is an armed citizenry.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm. Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people think that gun control laws are against the bill of rights and it gives a chance to the government to control people. The second amendment to the constitution of the United Stated supports that the gun is allowed to be used. In the book "The Second Amendment and the Personal Right to Arms", it states that "the right of people to keep and bear arms." (William 1236) It means that the second amendment allows the citizens to have a gun ownership.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Case Summary

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages

    out any of the modern guns as well as the guns that were around when the constitution was made. Another important court case is United States V. Masciandaro. This case is important to the Second Amendment. The case is about carrying a concealed weapon in plain view, a young man and his girlfriend where visiting a state park in Virginia. One of the park police officers noticed that their truck was not parked correctly in between the lines and got out of his vehicle to examine Masciandaro’s truck and when he did he noticed the gun, and called for backup (Halbrook).…

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If one person does not feel that owning firearms is right for them, they don’t have to buy them, but they should not attempt to tell someone else that because they don’t want a gun, the other person shouldn’t have one either. Most importantly, the second amendment must be preserved. There are those who feel since the wording on the bill of rights says to “form a well-armed militia” and since America has a fine full time fighting force the need for a militia is no longer present, and they would have a pretty good argument. But reflecting back on the George Washington’s letter in the Federalist papers, and the Supreme Court ruling, the right to keep and bear arms is about so much more than being able to stand up an army.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Founding Fathers of the United States wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason; to protect the rights of the people. This means that citizens have the privilege and ability to possess a gun and use than gun for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The government has no right to restrict them in owning guns for this reason. Further amending the right to own a gun would only do more harm than good in the United States. By creating stricter gun control laws, the government would not solve the problem of criminals obtaining weapons and would only take away the protection of the people.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays