Gun Ownership Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
The liberal ideology behind gun ownership takes the stance that some type of gun restriction or ban should be imposed to control the gun violence in the United States. The vast majority would be for an imposed restriction, while the farther left and fewer liberals would suggest for an all-out ban or ban on certain guns. Furthermore, believing that the gun is what causes the crime. If the gun was restricted in some way people would not have the ability to cause such harm to the general welfare of the common people. Some of these restrictions are: maximum clip limits, ban on certain assault rifles, and a system to track gun ownership. These bans to liberals make sense to curtail the mass shooting epidemic in the United States. Consequently, with …show more content…
Each shooting allows for the ideology of gun restriction to be a more prevalent thing in society to protect American citizens. Not taking into account that the government could turn on the citizens. Being unarmed seems more safe to liberal ideology because of the incidents of violence of the few.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy wrote an article in the New Republic on an all-out gun ban. The plethora of reasons were mostly acquainted with far left ideology. Stating, “Do not sort the population into those who might do something evil or foolish or self-destructive with a gun those who surely will not. As if this could be known” (Bovy). People that put gun owners in bad light are the ones who mishandle them. If guns were out of the picture the generalization of those people would not be an issue. However, she does not place her faith in the government doing an adequate job of controlling the guns in the United States, instead, she wants an all-out ban because it seems to be the only logical solutions to the shootings in the United States. Furthermore, Bovy believes the issue is too complicated to just put a ban on certain guns. If people are still allowed to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control supporters are lobbying for a mandatory waiting period for purchases of handguns. The states seek to reduce violence, murders, and crimes with the new gun laws. Advocates of gun control want restrictions on sales of all guns, but citizen groups and arms manufactures are trying to prevent this from happening. Polls from the states show public support for having background checks, banning larger round magazines and sale of assault weapons, and stricter gun trafficking laws. However, government should not limit private ownership of firearms due to statistics…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article against banning guns, by Shiha Dalmia, I believe they make a valid argument. It is unrealistic to believe that the government would be able to take all guns away, even if they put regulations on them. People have many ways to get their hands on guns, even if they have to do it illegally. The article states,” There is no easy way to get Americans to voluntarily surrender their guns. Asking them nicely won’t do the trick.” This implies that people feel personally attached to their guns and that they aren’t going to just turn them in.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is not.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). The argument they had used to retaliate at those facts were weak. By saying, “... at least those countries are trying,” means they’re not really trying hard enough. E specially if killers are getting their hands on guns. Having gun control in those countries and people are still getting guns makes you want to fear for your life.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Increasing gun control will negatively affect normal law abiding citizens. According to many people they think guns should be banned, but that will not work. Gun control affects normal law abiding citizens not only by limiting firearms & ammunition that can be purchased, it takes away our 2nd amendment right, and demotes organizations such as the NRA & Gun owners of America.Without guns we would not be the free country we are today (Pros & Cons : Gun legislation). Having a gun does not make you a bad person, a lot of people just need to realize it. Pushing for more gun control also comes with try to get rid of certain guns & ammunition.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Gun control is an attempt to cease violent crimes by strengthening laws on the ownership of firearms. Many people own guns for the security of their home, for use in hunting or target shooting, or for other reasons. Gun Control laws are aimed to reduce the criminal use of guns as much as possible and to intrude as little as possible with other gun use. Americans have had a long debate about federal regulation of firearms. Devotees of the ordinance also argue that without federal laws, declares with some firearms limitation will provide guns illegally to states with stiffer restrictions.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Debate

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The laws that have been created in the past and present, people being injured or even killed, and the president not having any response on the debate are some the issues that need answering. Although gun advocates feel their rights as citizens of the United States will be tampered if the government changes gun laws against them, new gun laws will stop gun violence and…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a set of policies that regulate the manufacturing, transfer, sale, and modification by civilians. There are always two kinds of people, one with an agreement and the others are disagreeing. People used to think guns are dangerous no matter to the society or personal, but some people would say that take control of the guns is the act of infringing their freedom of carrying guns. To achieve the Gun control is tough without a doubt because the numbers of the guns are enormous in the society, including legal and illegal guns. Therefore, stricter gun laws are difficult to make our country safer and the gun law is not strict enough because criminals can have their own way of getting guns, and the crime rate might increase against those law-abiding…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Activist in favor of gun control believe that with gun control being enacted that the United States would not only be better off but safer as well. The other party who disbelieve in the need for gun control believe that with it the country will only grow more corrupt considering the facts that the states that have had gun constraints have grown more violent prove their point. Gun control would keep guns out of the United States for a short period after it would be enacted, but as soon as they are smuggled into the United States all of the citizens who had previously given up their arms now have no guns to defend themselves against robbers, muggers, or whoever it might be that threatens their lives. In order to keep guns better under control without taking away guns from citizens is by enforcing security in places like schools and for the government to keep track of who is mentally unstable and to make sure that there is no chance what so ever for them to get in reach of a…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays