What Is Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

Superior Essays
Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes. These two articles disagree on a few main points, such as if gun control would actually influence gun violence, if self defense is …show more content…
In Lott’s article, he argues that self defense is a constitutional right and that it is needed to protect an individual and his/her family. According to the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment protects the right of the individual to possess firearms within their own property for the purpose of self defense. He argues that this is especially important in warding against burglars and those who attempt to break into homes. Of the four million burglaries that happen each year, only thirteen percent of them happened when there was a person at home. This is because “felons have often revealed that they are more deterred by the thought of running into an armed homeowner than they are of being caught by the police”(3). This is an excellent example, as Lott says, of how increased legal firearm carrying by citizens would deter criminals from committing crimes. Along with this, legal concealed gun carrying by citizens as they go about in public also protects against rape, deadly assault, and theft. In the hypothetical situation that Lott uses, if more people were encouraged to carry a concealed weapon there would be less rape, deadly assault, and theft because if there is a high percentage chance that the victim has a firearm the criminal will be less likely to commit the crime. Many criminals commit crimes against those they know do not have a way …show more content…
Lott argues that more gun control would do absolutely nothing, and be very ineffective. Lott says that criminals oftentimes procure their weapons illegally, and tightening gun restrictions would not do enough to completely stop illegal firearm trafficking. Therefore, gun violence would not be lowered. Lott compares this idea to illegal drug trafficking. Even though many narcotics, including marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines, are illegal in the United States, there is a high availability of each of these illegal substances. Lott says that the same would happen with firearms. Simply outlawing firearms will not solve the problem. Lot also argues that less gun control would be far more effective. If more people are encouraged to possess concealed firearms, then more criminals would be deterred from committing crimes. Lott argues that “the expected penalty of the crime affects the prospective criminal’s desire to commit a crime”(6). However, Kleck argues the opposite. He says that by restricting the supply of firearms within the country and tightening security at the Mexico border, less violence will happen. Making sure there are essentially no firearms are in circulation would lead to dramatically less gun violence, as it would make it increasingly difficult for a criminal or a mentally ill person to possess a firearm. By implementing a system of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    By limiting the rights of the legal citizens, the U.S. government does very little in preventing violent crime; perhaps only by stopping the illegal obtainment of weapons can they reduce violent crimes. Guns themselves do not kill people. It’s when weapons are placed in the hands of those who should not have them, those who will kill, that they kill someone…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control DBQ Essay

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A logical assertion can, and is, made that certain background checks are desirable in order to decrease the amount of deaths caused by guns. However, we need to understand the effectiveness of these checks, that many who want a gun will go to any means to acquire one. In a study conducted by Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick of John Hopkins University, over 80 percent of criminals evaluated were not lawful retail purchasers of firearms – as most acquired their weapons from sources such as family members and street sources (Source 1). Additionally, we need to understand that certain firearms illegal in certain states are brought in from other states in which they are legal. Both observations show that while increased background checks and illegalizing specific weapons do have an effect, they may only slow those who will do anything to have powerful armaments.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The only thing that stops a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun. " This is the basis of the argument for CC or concealed carry. Many people are clamoring for more gun control to stop crime sprees. However, history has shown that in a society with widespread weapon carrying, crime decreases. This is due to that when a criminal commits a crime, he is less likely to succeed in his misdeed due to the fact that the townspeople are armed.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many prominent leaders, including Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Robert Kennedy, were assassinated by deadly weapons-- firearms. Guns’ very existence can either harm or use to defend. The issue lies on who exactly gets hold of these weapons. Who should we trust? How should such laws be justified?…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 12 Works Cited

    As the country with the largest stockpile of privately owned firearms, we aren’t doing much to prevent them from falling on the wrong hands. According to The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act convicted felons, drug users and abusers, and mentally ill people are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms (FBI). But, convicted criminals and mentally ill people are acquiring firearms without any difficulty and are using them for the wrong reasons mainly because of weak laws that regulate the sale of firearms. Firearm sales in gun shows are not regulated by the FBI and buyers are not required to go through any kind of background checks at the time of purchase. According to a report by the UC Davis Violence Prevention Research Program titled “Inside Gun Shows: What Goes on When Everybody Thinks Nobody’s Watching”, it is reported that more than forty percent of gun sales occur privately without any regulations.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 12 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will be analyzing and criticizing the argument given by Jeff McMahan in his paper “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough”. This essay goes against my personal bias and strives to support an argument in favor of private gun ownership to a certain extent. McMahan is hasty in deciding that a complete ban is necessary to restore order and peace; I refute his conclusion by showing that a gun ban would not be able to stop the ongoing need for safety and because of this an increase in gun control policy would be the best solution to the gun problem in the United States. One portion of the paper provides a summary of the argument given by McMahan in his paper in depth, evaluating his premises and conclusion to establish the position the…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Increased gun control is needed to reduce incidents of gun violence in the U.S. Contention 1: States with stricter gun control laws have fewer deaths from gun-related violence compared to states with more lax laws Gun-related violence can be associated with the the restrictions put in place by certain states. According to a study put together by the Harvard School of Public Health, states in which guns are more prevalent--as in Wyoming, where 63% of households reported owning guns--rates of suicide were higher. The inverse was also true: where gun ownership was less common, suicide rates were also lower. This statement was supported by a study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health Professor of Health Policy David Hemenway. Hemenway quotes in this study that “studies show that most (suicide) attempters act on impulse, in moments of panic or despair.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you look at the facts, firearms are over 300 times more likely to stop crime, than to cause a crime. If guns were to be taken away from these citizens, murder rates would rise, and the chance to stop crime would drop immensely. In 2015, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in San Bernardino, California. Despite this states intense gun control, an attack was still carried out.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence Solution

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence in the United States has become one of the largest topics of debate as of recent. Murder has become much too common, and the rate of this crime is only increasing. The solution to violence, more specifically gun violence, is a large point of discussion in the current presidential race. Citizens and politicians alike have very different viewpoints on how this issue should be dealt with, and this disagreement is causing a hindrance to actually solving the problem at hand.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having the capacity to carry a concealed gun has been a questionable topic for a considerable period. Numerous individuals can carry concealed weapons since it is a type of self-protection. On the off chance that somebody carrying a concealed weapon is assaulted, they will have something to fight back with. On the other hand, individuals who are against carrying concealed guns say that it is not a compelling type of self-protection. On the off chance that somebody is attacked, they say that the victim will not have enough time to haul out a gun to safeguard themselves.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays