Gun Control: The Society's Viewpoint

Superior Essays
The Society’s Viewpoint. Gun control generally refers to laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms in order to control crime and reduce the harmful effects of violence. This topic has been a widely controversial topic throughout the United States for quite some time now, whether it should be considered illegal or not. There are many articles either for against, and neutral about this topic. The articles are different in many ways whether it is what side they are on or how the laws are structured. The purpose, audience, context and content, layout, and writer’s stance are all topic that each other these articles address whether it is evident or hidden. “Should More Guns …show more content…
“No Answer” has a general layout, more essay oriented. There is a header with a general title and then the essay underneath that title would be all written about that title. “Gun Control” had a unique layout about it that would catch the attention of both sides of the debate. This article was split up into a graph. The left side has all the benefits of gun control. This list is number one through fifteen. On the right side of the graph are the downfalls to having gun control. The list on the right side is also numbered one through fifteen. Under each of the listed statements on both sides of the graph is a short explanation for why these statements are being said. “Refuting” has a layout that is commonly shown in articles that are trying to prove that the other side is wrong. This article is numbered one through twenty one. Each number is titled with a statement that a anti-gun control advocate would say. Under each of these statements is a long, opinionated argument as to why the statement is nonsense or …show more content…
All three of the writers’ stances are different as far as opinion. The writer of “No Answer” is clearly against gun control and believes that gun control is no answer to crime. That is presented to us in the title “Gun Control Is No Answer to Crime”. As you continue to read the article, the authors makes it known that they are not for gun control by starting off saying “Stop Gun Control!”. Also the authors stated that all the criminals will continue to find weapons so outlawing them will do nothing. “ Refuting” writers are on for gun control and that is shown to us through their harsh and straight forward tone that is expressed throughout the whole paper. In one section the writer writes “Those who make this argument are misinformed as to the original intent of the second amendment” (Sager). The tone here seems a little aggravated and angered. The writer's stance of all three of these article are different and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And of course, mass shooting victims account for a tiny percentage of the Americans gunned down every year. A majority of children killed by guns are killed by accident, or by their own hand, or by adults, with weapons legally obtained by adults.”. Rosenthal points out that majority of guns that have been used to commit an act of violence was obtained legally, so again the purposed solutions to gun violence will only amount to a minor change to in gun…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stating this as not being the source of disagreement creates an effect of there being no question actually existing whereas the author introduces a much greater one. Therefore, in the course of no issue as to whether or not guns should be regulated, it seems clear that the controversy should be easily solved, but the author describes the true discrepancy of the issue. Further using the title “Guns a Loaded Argument,” to introduce the reader to the idea of gun control being a seemingly simple discussion when in fact it is a subject that is tough to reach any agreement…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Gun Control Everyone has their opinion over Guns, many believe it’s ok to have guns but others disagree. But many have guns for protection, I understand people abuse the power on having guns and commit a crime. Many shootings have occurred this year and last year.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Classic Argument Paper – Gun Control vs. Pro 2nd Amendment Argument ENGL 123 Jesse H. Dixon Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide It’s should come as no surprise that the gun control argument in America is fiery and emotional, with logic and civility most often being pushed aside by frustration, fear and anger. Most arguments over gun control come full of fallacies, and emotional appeal rather than true factual data. Neither side is happy with current gun laws. Gun owners feel their rights are being infringed, while gun control advocates believe it’s far to easy for the criminal or crazy person to get a firearm. Is there a better solution to the argument over gun control and the 2nd amendment?…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For Chau’s section, she focused on a multitude of Supreme Court Cases, while Nadal’s would be news reports and releases regarding shootings and their repercussions and so on and so forth. Mine, mainly, looked into the views of manufacturers, historical developments and federal actions to tie with the court cases and mass shootings also discussed. This allowed the design of the paper to network itself as to develop a solution that would conclude in deciding that, yes, the 2nd Amendment does need to be updated to accommodate for more modern firearms. While there were a handful of grammatical and syntax errors it was capable of easily being reworked and in the end created a rather solid paper in…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are used by millions of people for hunting and safety in the United States. However, a lot of shooting accidents were occurred in recent years. Many people think the Government should implement gun control. Government use laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms in order to control crime and reduce the harmful effects of violence. In fact the gun control is not a…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism and Gun Control Gun control in the United States has been a controversial topic for a number of years. The different ways in which one can interpret the constitution plays a big role in the controversy between whether certain gun control laws violate your civil liberties as citizens of the United States. There have been numerous court cases dealing with gun control, with some of the major including: District of Columbia Vs. Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a topic that divides the opinions of the United States citizens and creates endless discussions that until now has not reached a conclusion. The United States has faced many mass shootings during the last years making the supporters of gun control want a reform even more. Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States every year. The United States leads the world with more gun-related homicides and suicides than any other country, according to a 2016 study conducted by the American Journal of Medicine. (“Gun Control”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States holds about 35- 50 percent of the world’s civilian owned guns (Masters, 2016). In reviewing America’s history, this statistic may not seem so striking since guns have always played a major role in society. However, due to the recent events regarding gun violence and an increase in terrorism, the topic of gun control has become problematic for American. When discussing gun control there are mainly two views.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Realizing that his audience includes liberals who know this, Cronin does not try to find any rare statistics that are in favor of firearms. Although he could have just avoided numbers altogether, he concedes that, “statistically speaking, a gun in the home represents a far greater danger to the inhabitants than to the intruder” (Cronin 20*). Although he is giving up some ground on his case, this confession shows readers that Cronin is not trying to fool anyone. He argues that the dilemma of gun ownership is not as much about what the stats says, but instead a decision that “comes from the gut” (Cronin 20*). By admitting that guns could potentially bring danger to his family, it makes the reader even more eager to hear his pro-gun…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays