Gun Control Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
In the Amendments, politics, and society, it is known and taught to have a gun for protection in your house and for oneself. The Second Amendment states two factorial standpoints in regards to weapons and shelter. The foremost is, “security of people, property, and individual”. So, as Americans, we have a right and a duty to defend our lives and the life of those whom we love. It would be good to give up that to the police, but from a practical point of view that is neither safe nor smart. Too much can happen in the time it takes law enforcement to arrive. The second reason is politics. I think firearms are politics. They function as a reminder to those in power, the citizenry, who hunt the show. Owning a gun is a political deed. This impresses …show more content…
Alas, on that point are some stores that choose not to behave thus. The realness is the N.R.A. Does sell goods to people who shouldn't be permitted to have that right to own a gas pedal. In the media it is factorial that there are homicides, accidental deaths, shootings, killings. Everyplace you look at America, people are attempting to make life safer.Along roads, for instance, there has been a huge effort in the past 50 years to implement speed perimeter, crack down on drink/medicine driving and make protection features into highways, as well as vehicles. The conclusion is a steadily improving record. Obviously, there's no equivalent effort in the expanse of privately owned firearms. Indeed, most political leaders do everything they can to fix the country less secure. Lately, a Democrat senator from Arkansas named Mark Pryor ran a TV ad against the accelerator pedal-control campaign funded by NY mayor Michael Bloomberg – one of the few politicians to bear up to the NRA lobby – explaining why he was against improved background test on gun owners yet was committed to "finding real answers to violent behavior". Obvious yet politicians do not deliver the best interest for the safety of the American citizenry. This is why violence and history repeats itself and in reality it will never break away because the people that America looks up to do, not even apply strict policies or rules for the safety of the citizenry. Accuracy is, no nation sees itself as foreigner do. Partially the country is sensible and rational while the other half just doesn't grasp the inconsistencies and historic lunacy of its location, which recoils from the second amendment right to keep and bear arms, and is resulting from English familiar law and our 1689 Bill of Rights. We distributed with these human

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control {Gun Control – Pro} A criminal breaks into your house. What do you do? With gun control the criminal knows that you don’t have a gun and won’t hesitate to do or take whatever he pleases. In addition, the criminal will most likely have some type of weapon on him, but you won’t, and he’ll be able to kill you easily. Without gun control chances are, criminals won’t break into your house as much.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Its first goal is to “preserve the right of all law-abiding individuals to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S Constitution”. NRA is now considered one of the most influential political lobbies in the United States because of its ability to provide regularly a large number of votes during elections. In fact, according to the Washington Post, “261 congressional candidates have received donations from the NRA to campaign in 2012; 25 Democrats and 2361 Republicans” . 80% have won the elections and therefore sit in the Congress. However after the Sandy Hook’s shooting on December 2012, the National Rifle association remains silent on social networks.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nick Anyaegbunam March 9th, 2018 Congress, Bureau, and Public Policy March 8th, 2018 Unfortunately, one of the most heated debates that have encapsulated our political discussion is gun control. Since Sandy Hook in November 2012, there have been over 1600 mass shootings within the United States, which claimed about 1,800 casualties and over 4600 wounded. The United States is the only country in which mass shootings occur frequently. In order to combat this epidemic and enhance our lax gun control policy, I would like to explain how Representative David Cicilline’s legislation on gun control could quite possibly navigate its way through our intricate legislative process and possible roadblocks for this bill on its arduous journey to becoming a law.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control can be Dangerous Gun control has been a very controversial issue in the United States for centuries. It gets worse after every mass shooting because it causes both political sides to debate on whether or not to implement stricter gun policies that will make it much more difficult for people to obtain a weapon. The founding fathers wrote the second amendment because they were afraid of a government that would become too big an oppressive. They believed that people should have the right to protect their families if there is ever an attack like an intruder attempting to harm your family. There are many countries that have tried to implement stricter gun control policies, policies that have persuaded United States officials to…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Gun Laws Be Strict

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Caveda Johnson English Comp. 1 12 October 2016 Should Gun Laws Be More Strict The 1791 Constitutional second amendment of the United States of America allowed that people can have the capability to keep and bear firearms (Spitzer). Gun laws and restrictions are different in various states across America and also among other countries. Some countries do not even allow anybody to own a gun unlike in America where the second amendment allow the people of USA to own guns.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does someone who shoplifts a candy bar get sentenced to death? Do American people get thrown in prison for practicing their religion? Is it illegal to speak your mind? The answer to these questions is obviously no. These are basic human rights given to us by the constitution and to take these away would be unconstitutional.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many opponents of gun control argue that limits on gun ownership are unconstitutional because they violate the Second Amendment, which includes the phrase the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Opponents often emphasize the “shall not be infringed part while ignoring the other clause about the right being connected to a well regulated Militia but nobody’s perfect. Even emphasizing the right component, however, if we slow down and think about what an absolute right to bear arms would look like, it’s clear that even the people making the argument don’t believe in it. If the right to bear arms cannot be infringed, mentally ill felons can own nuclear weapons.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murders and home invasions are a huge factor in today's reality; many people can get seriously hurt, or even worse, dead. Owning a concealed handgun would help prevent many of these disasters from happening. Lives could even be saven; a lot of people do not own a firearm because it's illegal to own one without a permit. Anderson, Dave People should still have them to protect themselves from any of those causes that mentioned above, such as murders, robbery, and abduction. Owning a weapon would stop people from getting hurt.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then we as a country could move on to more appropriate levels of self defense such as tasers, and pepper spray. Self defense mechanisms that are much less lethal and more appropriate than taking someone 's…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In addition to mental health issues.” (Heninzmann). David Heninzmann also confesses, “Several police officers who work in high-crime neighborhoods said they support the law, in part because law-abiding citizens who live in dangerous neighborhoods may have a better chance to defend themselves”(Heninzmann). Innocent citizens should be able to be protected by their handgun in their unsafe neighborhoods. Additionally, guns are mostly used in situations where people are threatened.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays