Gun Control And The Second Amendment

Improved Essays
The government tries to take control guns that are carried in the United States. Should the government even go that far to stop people from doing what they feel is best? The government and states should not control guns to such extents. People have the right to carry weapons as long as it is for defense and that is under protection from the United States Amendment II. Gun control violates the Second Amendment. There is civilian need to carry weapons for protection on a daily basis. States that don’t have gun control laws actually have lower murder rates due to the fact that the crooks have a sense of being afraid not knowing whether the victim will have an weapon for self defense. Laws do not apply to criminals thus leaving the rest of the …show more content…
Information of crimes doesn’t usually get sent into the law enforcement until the event just happened and or when it’s too late. When people are in such countries or states in the United States that have strict gun laws more people tend to die. When people have guns and something occurs they can take the job for themselves and decide on a quick notice whether they have to take action or not. The crucial moments from when an assailant fires his weapon and from when law enforcement shows up could even be up within the few minute mark, those moments are the life and death moments for the average civilian being in the crossfire of the assailant. If an average person had an weapon to protect himself, imagine what could happen at that moment. Lifes will be definitely saved at the time even if one single person were to be armed. The connection between self defense and guns is a big topic and debate all around the States. Some might state that people don’t need guns for self defense because others don’t know what guns can cause and don’t take it seriously, however there hasn’t been a case in a long time where someone didn’t know what they were doing and misfired, there is a reason why there is an age limit for owning a carry arm. Many also say that guns are the reason why people die, but actually the person who fires the gun is the person who kills the other, not the gun actually. The gun only does the work, while the person actually decides to kill. A recent event happened in Australia 12/15/14 where one single terrorist took hostage of 17 people in a cafe at a fairly populated area. Australia is home of strict gun laws preventing many civilians from carrying weapons that could save many lives at times like this event. Australia has around 175,000 civilians with carry arm pistols. Even though that does mean less crime at some times, it means that some event’s like this one can’t be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Pro Gun Control

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All the while, the 15-year-old (in self defense of himself and his younger sister) grabbed his father’s AR-15 and shot at one of the burglars. He succeeded in scaring them away and no one was even hurt (AR-15). Of course, there is the old saying; “Guns don’t kill people… People kill people”. And this is true in most cases. A criminal could just as well stab someone as use a gun on them when mugging, burglarizing, or even just causing terror.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chicago Bans Guns in Places That Serve Booze In liquor stores and other alcoholic stores in the city of Chicago, Illinois, they decide to make stricter laws and banned concealed guns by law in these stores. The state of Illinois was given six months to devise a concealed carry law after the United States Court of Appeals ruled there law unconstitutional, in December 2012. After much debate, the government could not change the effect of concealed career weapons in society and they resorted to making gun-control laws stricter. They decided to inflict a law prohibiting concealed-weapons in businesses that make more than half of their revenue from selling alcohol.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Free Zones

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Historically, attacks happen in places where there are the strictest gun control laws and in gun free zones. Gun free zones are a terrorist’s best friend. Some people say, in today’s world of security, criminals could never get away with having guns. However criminals will always find a way to get access to guns. Even if someone does not pass a background check they can assemble an assault rifle.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Imagine a world where the people have no say in anything, where we are told what to do, day after day. Well that might be a direction this country heads to if the citizens let the government do as it pleases. The people of the United States have freedoms not seen in any other part of the world but slowly and slowly they are attempted to be yanked from them. A pressing issue on this matter is the ability for the people of this nation to be able to own a firearm or for them to be banned to the public. Well everyone has a say in this.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is our constitutional right and no one or no thing should tamper with it. There is a lot of crime in this world and a lot of it associates with gun use, but taking away guns isn’t the best option. Putting restrictions and so forth on the use of buying and selling of guns is the best way to go. Many arguments out there say that if they were to allow someone to have a gun then it will automatically turn into a murder or big crime. Whatever happened…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crystal Malmgren Dr. Robar Essay 1 October 8, 2017 Nationalism and populism play a big part in our political system. But not a lot of people understand there are different political views, where they come from, or how they started. Many people also have their own opinions about certain political views. First, I will review nationalism's history and what viewpoints it holds.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Laws

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In America, however, it seems as if we live in a society where things such as mass shootings are just considered as a part of life, and are inevitable. This however, is not true, seeing that other countries have implemented gun control legislation and have experienced highly positive results. Because restrictions placed on guns reduce gun violence,…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Bad Idea Americans dote on guns. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " Many people take advantage of the Second Amendment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In California

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the state of California, possession of automatic firearms, and short-barreled shotguns are prohibited. Some people argue that owning a handgun increases a person's risk of being killed. Others say that guns aren't the problem, the people are. Managing the type of people that are allowed access to guns, through background checks, can reduce gun violence without taking the right to self-defense. Guns laws in California are much more restrictive compared to other states (ScienceNews).…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control should not be legalized in the United States, because it is part of our constitution and it needs to be followed. According to Paul Gosar/Second Amendment and Gun Rights/1-11-16 he said “In the Federalist No. 46, James Madison explained that because American citizens were typically armed, the federal government would be unable to exert power beyond the powers enumerated in the Constitution”. pretty much James Madison explained that since guns were a way of life then it was meant to be in the constitution. When one rule is followed then the whole system is together. With citizens being armed then the citizens would be safe and protected.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. Instead, it would put many people in danger. The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, the Supreme Court should seriously take a look at what has been happening in the U.S. and ban all of these illegal fire arms once and for all. Guns are used for only military purposes, not using illegal guns to kill innocent people in churches, clubs, movie theatres, schools, and neighborhoods. Bullets these days cannot be taken back, and the horrific crimes that have took place recently in Orlando, cannot buy the lives that have been lost by illegal firearms. Therefore, we need to oppose gun ownership and gun control. I challenge you, the audience, to support ban guns in public places and save…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This proves how increased gun control will not be the answer to end violent shootings. If someone was to break into your home, chances are that calling 911 will not save you. Self-defense techniques do not provide adequate protection against an armed attacker, so the only…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays