A Brief Summary Of Gun Control Laws

Good Essays
We, as citizens of the United States, have the right to bare arms - given to us in the second Amendment of the United States Constitution. This country has a rich history regarding guns. People have used them and continue to use them for hunting, sports or recreation, and protection. However, when a mass murder or a domestic terror attack occurs, the right to bare arms is put under discretion as people cause an uproar over the violent acts. Creating more gun control laws would not stop the crimes related to guns, but rather, ownership and people being educated does, as criminals would still find a way to have access to a gun and commit a crime.
When a state puts restrictions on the ownership of guns, they tend to have more gun-related murders.
…show more content…
Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition. When the 18th Amendment, prohibiting alcohol, which led to various speakeasy’s being opened across the United States. In comparison, the same will happen if guns were prohibited or national laws were placed on them. Criminals will find access to a gun and known law-abiding citizens will become “criminals” in order to preserve their sense of safety by owning a gun. Might I add, the 21st Amendment overturned alcohol prohibition because the government, Congress, came to the conclusion it was so ridiculous; we should not have to go through the same process with guns. We cannot, a a country, limit the rights of law-abiding citizens in an attempt to prevent the criminal, who won’t abide by the laws, from committing …show more content…
Stated by, President Obama, after the shooting in Oregon on October 1st, 2015, “We know that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest gun deaths” (“Obama”). Nevertheless, there are instances where stricter gun control laws do not greatly, if at all,decrease the rate of homicides. As great as the idea that there’s a correlation between gun control laws and a decrease in gun-related homicides may sound, it doesn’t always happen as so. What people fail to take account for is that correlation is not causation. Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”? The United States Constitution was made in a way to be able to be adjusted to the needs

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The use of logos was ineffective because it was proven killers still had access to weapons in countries with strict gun laws. Making it show the reader of the article would not have the same viewpoint as The Editorial…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why is the Gun Control in the area that have the strictest laws on gun control not working? The answer is obvious it only prevent legal sales of firearms, it can’t stop illegal sales. Although gun control can stop some petty criminals from getting their hands on a gun. It can’t stop a determined one from getting it illegally from an illegal dun dealer. By definition a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns. After that, gun control is not a guarantee of reducing deaths. To implement gun control, it means governments restrict the sales, purchases, owning and carrying guns. It is not only ineffective in reducing death rates, but that increases with high speed. Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Right To Bear Arms Essay

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pro-gun control advocates make weak arguments saying that there is a large correlation between drinking and gun ownership and that easily obtainable guns are the cause of gun violence. But these arguments are baseless and wrong. Guns are things that, when placed in the right hands, have the power to save. It is wrong to blame a gun for violence and wrong to believe that banning legal guns would stop the black market sale of illegal guns. Criminals will find a way to get what they want.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If more people are encouraged to possess concealed firearms, then more criminals would be deterred from committing crimes. Lott argues that “the expected penalty of the crime affects the prospective criminal’s desire to commit a crime”(6). However, Kleck argues the opposite. He says that by restricting the supply of firearms within the country and tightening security at the Mexico border, less violence will happen. Making sure there are essentially no firearms are in circulation would lead to dramatically less gun violence, as it would make it increasingly difficult for a criminal or a mentally ill person to possess a firearm.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argument Against Gun Ban

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What a gun ban really is, is something limits the self defense of our nation's citizens and keeps them unprotected against those who wish them harm. It is improbable that a ban will prevent criminals from getting guns, they will however, keep a law abiding citizen from legally purchasing a self defense weapon. Banning guns gives citizens less of a chance to protect themselves. A gun is the most effective form of self defense, when someone is srtipped of their right to have that is leaves them vulnerable, this is another serious problem with gun control because it gives…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Shooting a gun does not simply happen by itself, but the person behind the gun pulling the trigger. By regulating gun laws, we may say that by having stricter gun control, it will be difficult for criminals to get a hold of a gun, but it does not mean that there will be less crime or fewer deaths. Criminals do not follow the law regardless, so what makes everyone think that by having gun control, or by regulating gun laws that it will change the way things are. Therefore, there should not be stricter gun control laws in the United States.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Its is important to know that guns do need to have some restrictions to a certain extent, but not to the point where it disarms our citizens who obey the law. Gun control cannot stop guns from getting into the hands of criminals, they will manage a way of getting guns to their desire. What seems seems to be the problem is gun control because it only hurts the ones who obey the law. We as Americans need to protect the rights of this nation to be free, gun control affects our citizens and not the…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays