Gun Control In Philadelphia

Improved Essays
Philadelphia is proud of the reputation of being “the city of brotherly love”, with the LOVE park and sign right in Center City. However, Philly has gained a reputation for something else in recent years that have brought this nickname into a question; this city has become an example of rising gun violence, with constant shootings and multiple deaths. Every day and night, people are shot and often even killed for various and sometimes mysterious reasons. The city of brotherly love is in desperate need of more control of armed weapons, because gun violence has led to an increase in violence and deaths, weapons are too easy to obtain, and the police are being rendered powerless to stop the rising shootings. Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia is …show more content…
(Roth, 2014) The idea that anyone can shoot you at any time and claim it as
“self-defense” is scary, and whether people admit it or not, this cause of fear only exists because almost anyone can get their hands on a gun. Guns have a specific purpose- to defend and protect the innocent, mainly in the instances of war and self-defense. However, with that weapon comes the necessity to be able to protect the innocent against those who would misuse firearms. Stricter gun control would greatly benefit the city of Philadelphia; in fact this would benefit the entire world. There is no way to prevent all the violence and deaths in the world; however, if gun violence were better controlled, there would be significant improvement in the amount of shootings, both with injuries sustained and fatalities. The city of brotherly love could be a leader in these efforts, helping to preserve and protect lives. To stop all the senseless gun violence, the first step is to stop the abuse of this weapon that holds the power to both protect and destroy. Philadelphia can tip the scale so that guns aren’t used to take lives, just to save

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    People should have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property, however there are guns that can be purchased that have no real purpose unless you are planning a mass shooting. Of course some people just purchase these because they believe they are cool. I agree that these should be illegal to sell. Gun control would be great, but I believe it is an impossible goal. In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals will always get their hands on guns even with stricter gun laws, the people need to defend themselves. Gun free zones are no help, it just makes it easier for crazy people to kill people without being stopped. Armed citizens would be able to fight back in those situations where mass shootings happen, and overall save many lives. There should be fewer laws on the restriction of guns, to get a gun all you should need is a background check and to take a class on how and when to use a gun. No laws will stop or prevent these shootings from ever happening, but just take more and more freedoms away from the people.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A law abiding citizen would not go out of their way to obtain a handgun and break the law, making them the only people without some means self-defense. People who plan on murdering someone are not going to stop and think about breaking a handgun violation if they are already planning on committing a much greater crime. All bans on handguns take away a valuable form of self-defense, leaving thousands maybe even millions of Americans at…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun control activist claim that it is the gun that causes the problem but the problem is the people behind the gun. The gun can’t make a decision for someone the actor is the one responsible and if he wants a gun he will do whatever is in his capability to get a gun whether it be off the black market or smuggling it over the border. The only way to keep shootings and crimes from happening in the U.S. is an increase in protection, the addition of SRO’s at schools and higher security entering and exiting buildings such as…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, gun control is useless for gun safety. There are many murder weapons to put us in danger, such as transportation, pest control, knife, and so on. If we only want to control gun ownerships to prevent harm, we also need to think about control other murder weapons. Also, if we have gun control, kids still have chances to play guns, if their parents have legal guns at home. It states that gun control is helpless to avoid kids to use guns.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That when you buy a gun, you’re either going to be hurting yourself or another person. The Board also makes note of how officials try to distract the public with “arguments about the word terrorism,” (End the Gun Epidemic in America), but aren’t calling the shooting sprees and other gun shootings terrorism. Pathos was used well here because terrorism is always going to be an emotional and frightening topic to think or talk about. Especially since it’s happening in your own country but no one wants to shed light to the idea that mass shootings are related to terrorism. Pathos was effective because the argument to stricter gun laws provoked fear and emotions by shedding light on the real reason to buy a…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass Shootings

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The public must first pay no mind to the farfetched fears of someone like Alex Jones. A solution needs to be able to prevent these mass shootings that are becoming more frequent in the U.S. A solution must be created that makes it hard for criminals to become armed while allowing trustful civilians to arm themselves. A solution that satisfies both sides is quite possible. The way to control guns, is actually not focusing on the guns themselves. It is more crucial to focus on the bullets that fuel there deadly capabilities.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With a lot of mass shooting as happened off guard with those who do not have protection with them during these situations. Being able to carry a handgun should not be spoken down upon. For those who can protect themselves during random massive shootings will be able to prevent many deaths during the attack. If no one can be able to protect themselves during random attacks, why are the people of America living by the Constitutional Rights? As mentioned in the previous paragraph, we have the right to bear arms to protect ourselves.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics