Gun Control: Known In Every State Of The United States

Great Essays
Gun Control is a debate that is known in every state of the United States of America. Many of the debates are in congress or the senate. These debates are about is existing laws are sufficient enough or if we need more. When it comes to votes, 52 percent are against gun control. While 46 percent are for gun control. Sure, there are school shootings, but those are criminals. What about the citizens that own guns for hunting and in collections. They deserve to own guns without worry of losing them to a law because of a few school shootings. It doesn’t make sense why so many congressmen and senate men are so afraid of about less than 50 school shootings. Gun control is utterly useless if you ask me and really any other gun owning southerner could …show more content…
If gun control fails, people can fight back using their own guns. Not only that, but if criminals know civilians have guns, they would be in fear of being shot and would not attempt illegal acts. This not only will decrease crime, but also decrease how many people are killed by criminals. To be honest, I thinks that more police officers are needed, along with marines on rooftops. With criminals in fear of being shot with lethal and nonlethal weapons, they won’t commit crimes.With soldiers on the rooftops, they could spot a crime as they receive a message and they use their tranquilizer weapons. Neutralizing the receiving end of the tranquilizer weapon, then police arresting the offender. This will definitely be very effective because police no longer have to chase on foot, soldiers in the roofs will neutralizing the offender so police have an easy job. No longer will police run their little hearts out to chase someone who may or may not have better cardio then them, they only need the soldiers in the roofs. Doing this will also cause fear in criminal brains. Thus, decreasing crime by at least half or less, it is just a guess. A wild guess to decrease crime, yes. It could be correct, criminals would be afraid of being shot or arrested so they would not do the crime. I know most everyone else would, so why not criminals? They are …show more content…
It should be patrols of marines with tranquilizer, taser, lethal, and nonlethal grade weaponry, along with batons and handcuffs. Gun control is really useless in this matter. All that is needed is heavily armed soldiers and police. It may seem like Communism, but it really isn’t, it is simply government enforcers uphold the law. The fear of all the armed forces will decrease murders and crime, at the same time, some criminals may give up crime for good. Hopefully we will not have to supply the forces with anything but non-lethal pepper balls instead of lethal-grade weapons or ammunition. As I see it, we will have to soon, because criminals are committing more and more crimes everyday. If the government does not act quickly, we will be overrun with crime and murder. Soon, criminals will work for terrorists if gun control is allowed to exist any longer. What America needs are enforcers, not gun control. This leads us to where crimes are more frequent and lethal. The soldiers would then be able to have honor of protecting America, within America, by protecting the people from criminals. It seems like nothing much but it is as important as fighting terrorists. When soldiers are ordered to help with law enforcement, there will be instant changes. Police will have easier time catching law offenders and bring justice to the land quicker. Thus, having our country safer and more livable to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The criminals would just want to get the hands on the guns even more so they can sell it at a high rate for profit. Criminals did the same thing when probation started. The government would just help these criminals get more money and have many of their good citizens dislike them. This ban of guns will also help criminals get away with more crimes because now the no one can have guns the government does not know who the gun belongs to when a crime is committed because they could not monitor who has one. “The official report on the worst mass shooting in America history concluded that a limit on magazine capacity…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon. It will be scratched off so the weapon cannot be tracked. “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If guns are legally taken away from victims then violent crimes would increase, because criminals would not have to fear being shot by someone protecting themselves. They could break into homes and feel confident that they will be safe in committing whatever crime they choose, whether it is rape, robbery, or murder. People should have the right to defend themselves, their families, and their property. Suicides and crimes of passion are easy to commit when a gun is readily available, is another believe of the anti-gun advocates. They believe that if a gun was not available than these people would take more time to think things through and perhaps not commit the crime at all.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals will always get their hands on guns even with stricter gun laws, the people need to defend themselves. Gun free zones are no help, it just makes it easier for crazy people to kill people without being stopped. Armed citizens would be able to fight back in those situations where mass shootings happen, and overall save many lives. There should be fewer laws on the restriction of guns, to get a gun all you should need is a background check and to take a class on how and when to use a gun. No laws will stop or prevent these shootings from ever happening, but just take more and more freedoms away from the people.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is not a viable approach of reducing crime due to the smuggling of guns into the country. The authorities should strengthen border patrol and port security so that illegal immigrants with criminal minds do not enter. It also assists in ensuring that they illegal weapons are not smuggled in the country. This will assist in stabilizing the security industry that has been under criticism due to poor decision…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is because “felons have often revealed that they are more deterred by the thought of running into an armed homeowner than they are of being caught by the police”(3). This is an excellent example, as Lott says, of how increased legal firearm carrying by citizens would deter criminals from committing crimes. Along with this, legal concealed gun carrying by citizens as they go about in public also protects against rape, deadly assault, and theft. In the hypothetical situation that Lott uses, if more people were encouraged to carry a concealed weapon there would be less rape, deadly assault, and theft because if there is a high percentage chance that the victim has a firearm the criminal will be less likely to commit the crime. Many criminals commit crimes against those they know do not have a way…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe this is a better idea because criminals tend to not follow the law. By putting more restrictions, it could possibly hurt the citizens because they’re unable to protect themselves. According to Marco Rubio, a republican senator, stated, “My skepticism about gun laws is criminals don’t follow the law. They don’t care what the law is, you can pass any law you want and criminals won’t follow it.” I believe Marco Rubio has a good point because if they’re going to commit an illegal crime, they’re not going to legally register the gun. Mass shootings are a big issue due to the large amount of deaths, but this relates to Rubio’s statement because it won’t stop…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning Capital Punishment

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    To afraid those criminals, government had strengthen legal by giving those criminals a merciless capital punishment so that can set an example to those criminals or people who want to commit a crime and it will provide a safer environment to the society. Capital Punishment reduces the chances of offenders returning to society indefinitely. Because of the merciless capital punishment, all the criminals and those people who are planning to commit a crime will be think before they committed a crime. Human being are started with only one life, once it lost will never get back again, that why life is priceless. Therefore the criminals will be afraid to losing their all whole life just because of committed a crime.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics