Gun Control Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Murderers intend to break the law by killing. Would those people follow a law that prevents them from getting the tools to kill? For example, a firearm. Would they not get a firearm and obey the law if they were planning to break it anyway? This is an example of the topic of gun control, whether gun laws should be more or less strict. Though the results of laws being less strict are far more acceptable than laws being more strict. Some reasons include that when guns are removed, crime increases, possessing a firearm can help with self defense, and when guns are taken out, gun violence still exists.
Primarily, removing guns causes more crimes. Samuel Francis, contributor of Gun Control: Opposing Viewpoints, states “One year after the mass confiscation
…show more content…
To put that into perspective, if there was a population of 1 million people, thirty-two thousand more people would have been included in the deaths. Because of the confiscation, crime was increased, causing a spike in violence in death. Another study found that “So after all the pro-gun control grandstanding and the relentless focus on how the so-called easy availability of guns drives up crime, the CRS report shows that more guns–especially more concealable guns–has actually correlated with less crime" (Perry). More guns available to people meant that crime went down. Because of the exposure to guns, there was a correlation with less crime. Although, an article states “The gun homicide rate in England and Wales is about one for every 1 million people in a population of 56 million, that adds up to about 50 to 60 gun killings annually. In the USA, by contrast, there are about 160 times as many gun homicides in a country that is roughly six times larger in population. There were 8,124 gun homicides in 2014, according to the latest FBI figures” (Onyanga-Omara). The gun homicide rate in England (England prohibits the use of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence In Englewood

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Chicago Tribune Crime in Chicagoland, the author states, “More than 300,000 people are killed by firearm each year. When gun control occurred, police had taken 4,824 illegally owned guns off the street” (Chicago Tribune Crime In Chicagoland). This quote proves that when gun control hasn’t existed yet, people would become extremely violent and decide to kill whoever they want, so the death rate would be extraordinary high. As gun control permitted into the neighborhood, even though the death rates has been high, but they have been reduced. If more gun laws were produced, then innocent lives wouldn’t be lost.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control DBQ Essay

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A popular view held by gun-control advocates is that withholding guns from the public will eradicate the multitude of deaths involving people who would not be commonly called “criminals”. Instances such as when a man shot and killed a man in a theater for not turning his phone off, or when a middle school boy shot two fellow student with a shotgun stored in his instrument case (Source…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Issues Against Gun Control

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Gun control doesn’t protect people from violent criminal offense, it increases it. Every area where gun control is high, there is a higher instance of gun violence and crime in general. In areas where there are less restrictive gun laws, you’ll see lower instances of crime and mob violence.” (Skeptical Eye). Many people act not like the thought of having their right to possess a weapon taken off.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    more guns more deaths. Also, other countries have had success with gun control by doing a gun buyback program. In Australia, the government bought back 650,000 guns resulting in a homicide rate dropped by 42 percent 7 years after passing, as well as a 57 percent drop in firearm suicide according to a Harvard study. The fact that people are the ones who kill people is still correct at the end, but in order to decrease gun violence, less is more in this…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you look at the facts, firearms are over 300 times more likely to stop crime, than to cause a crime. If guns were to be taken away from these citizens, murder rates would rise, and the chance to stop crime would drop immensely. In 2015, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in San Bernardino, California. Despite this states intense gun control, an attack was still carried out.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like America, Europe has suffered a series of massacres than have made to tighten up its gun law. Indeed, to have stricter laws on gun control, does not guarantee that massacres or shootings will disappear; but at least, a restriction on the use of weapons reduces deaths by firearms, which have a higher number of death compared to other kind of crime. Even though Americans pro-gun consider that tough law in Europe did not reduce the crime rates, Europeans still have lower crime statistics compared to America. For example, Britain tightened its laws after a shooting incident in Scotland in 1996, increasing the procedures for obtaining a firearm, as a result, crime rates fell. Most countries in the European Union have rigid laws regarding the use of weapons but countries like the Czech Republic and Serbia are far more flexible rules that allow free use of firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two percent oppose tougher gun control. Throughout the essay the article depicts one sided evidence, this point is clearly portrayed when the author states that, “Moreover the rate of fatal gun accidents has been declining while the level of gun ownership has been rising.” This is inaccurate because these both work hand-in-hand, if the rate of gun ownership is rising the amount of gun accidents will also sky rocket, due to illegal confiscation of these weapons by criminals. The increase of gun ownership does not put a limitation on the malicious acts that criminals commit. Criminals will be criminals despite the circumstance.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people have guns criminals are less likely to commit that act of violence. One of the main reasons guns are such a controversial topic is that crimes and violence are often associated with guns, but the truth is when citizens are safely armed crime is deterred. Stricter gun control would only endanger those that could be well protected and crime…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control It was a Saturday night, and a young male was taking a walk down the street. The next thing you know the old man had him at gunpoint. With the gun in the young male’s face, he screamed “Give me all your money!”. Shocked and confused, he did not know what to do,so he ran. The young male running ticked off the robber.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To conclude, gun control in the USA is currently ineffective in reducing crime, but strict, enforced, gun control may be able to reduce crime, if properly…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The safety of the public is not in the hands of the gun itself, but in those intentionally misusing them. Over the last decade, crime has been on the rise thanks to increase in drug trade and the lack of regulations on the gun owners themselves. Many believe that if we stop giving the public, as a whole, the option to purchase firearms that gun violence will decrease over time. Taking guns away from our citizens is not the answer. Gun control does not deter crime: gun ownership deters crime.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you think about it, the people that commit those 10,000 gun related killings will not listen to the law if you take away the people’s right to bear arms. It is illegal to kill someone but you still see over 15,000 people being killed each. So How do you think taking away guns would affect the crime rate? It would increase the killings since people would not be able to protect themselves while the bad people would still be finding a way to get a gun and shoot someone.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Primarily, we must first look at the result of gun control from a few other countries including Great Britain, Ireland, and Jamaica. Statistics show that after these countries banned guns, their murder rates greatly increased. Crime didn’t even stay where it was before the ban. Instead, it got far worse. Criminals see the gun ban as an opportunity to commit crime and murder and get away with it.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays